Freewill Tiger
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
cm0002@lemmy.world to Science@mander.xyz · 1 month ago

Cleaning plastic containers in a dishwasher is a source of microplastic pollution, study finds

phys.org

external-link
message-square
35
fedilink
1
external-link

Cleaning plastic containers in a dishwasher is a source of microplastic pollution, study finds

phys.org

cm0002@lemmy.world to Science@mander.xyz · 1 month ago
message-square
35
fedilink
Washing household plastic containers in a dishwasher releases nanoplastic and microplastic pollution into wastewater, University of Queensland researchers have found.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The overall plastic mass equated to about 6 milligrams per person per year, or about a quarter of the weight of a grain of rice

    • Bigfishbest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Multiply by nr of persons and years…

      • ilega_dh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, that is what “per person per year” means

  • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Contaminating what? My septic tank that gets emptied every 10 years?

    • swampdownloader@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Where do you think the truck that empties your tank goes?

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No clue. Guess thats what im asking.

        • swampdownloader@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They haul it and dispose of it in the sewer.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It goes with the water that leaves your septic tank.

      A septic tank is only meant to separate the water from oils and sludge.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Really? So all my piss goes right thru and into my yard? If it filters out and stores solids wouldn’t it also catch the microplastics too?

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Depends on where you live. Mine goes trough the septic tank towards the sewer. A lot of houses also just go directly to the sewers.

          And no, many microplastics are too lightweight to settle with the solids.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Betcha scrubbing them in the sink does too. It’s just harder to set up a controlled study.

    • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My dish sponge is plastic.¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I wish they would have done that. Would be interesting to see. Hand washed plastic containers are subjected to much more mechanical scrubbing action, but much less heat.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dishwashers usually wash hotter than you do in the sink & reuse the water, so I’d imagine they also produce more microplastic in the process.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hotter yes, but no plastic-on-plastic scrubbing. And not reusing the water wouldn’t change the amount of plastic, it would just be diluted in a larger amount of water. My guess would be, larger particles. But I can see why that would have to be its own, more complicated study. Because so many more variables.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Do you know that water with microplastics doesn’t cause even more microplastics? Seems reasonable to me - the existing microplastic should be ground even finer, and also cause more microplastic to be ground off.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Interesting thought, we’ll have to include it in our study. I posit that the microparticles from hand washing will be larger anyway, because method, and will include plastic from the scrubber as well as the containers.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              There’s a good chance! Really depends on the impact of temperature, though since we’re still waaaaay below the melting point of plastic, intuitively I’d agree with you.

              • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                So where do we get our funding? I’m thinking about a billion, if we call it The Big Beautiful Golden Study, sponsored by plastic and dishwasher manufacturers.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  No no no, you have to think about it differently. Neither of those industries will want to sponsor something like this. Instead we have to go with their natural enemies - and was is the opposite of plastic (i.e. what is non-plastic)? Obviously concrete!

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    And people are grossed out when they learn that people can have enough micro/nanoplastic in their brain to make a disposable plastic spoon (2g). :)

    • magiccupcake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s up to a credit card now (9g)

      Source

      • President Camacho@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The methodology used to get that result is supposedly very questionable.

        I heard it here:

        Science Vs: Is There Really a Plastic Spoon in Our Brains?

        Not to minimize the impact of microplastics, but the credit card amount is probably way off.

      • EySkibidiBabBab@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        When i die i want my brain plastic to be used for a warhammer figurine!

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      the microsplastic keep my brain smooth and flexible :3

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This made me chuckle

      • Romkslrqusz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Neuroplasticity

  • timeghost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Plastic is poison.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Basically any situation where plastic is warmed is a source of microplastic contamination

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Probably mechanical abrasion too. Like car tires. Or your carpets/rug. Or your toothbrush. Or your nylon/sport/athlesure wear. Or soft, non-natural blankets, haha. I bet your furniture, too…

      • desktop_user [they/them] @lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        wool carpets for the win.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And yet somehow it lasts forever in a landfill.

      We can’t win.

      • 18107@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just wash your dishes in a landfill.

    • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Basically any situation where plastic is ,warmed is a source of microplastic contamination

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well I don’t want my Vitamin P to be covered in bacteria.

Science@mander.xyz

science@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science@mander.xyz

General discussions about “science” itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 5 users / day
  • 71 users / week
  • 143 users / month
  • 790 users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 4.75K subscribers
  • 611 Posts
  • 1.62K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.10
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org