The House of Representatives is trying to pass a resolution making the term “Free Palestine” an official antisemitic slogan.

Republican Representative Gabe Evans from Colorado introduced the resolution in the wake of the attack on a gathering for Israeli hostages in Boulder this week. Mohammed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been charged for the attack, during which he yelled “Free Palestine,” according to the FBI.

“Whereas, while shouting ‘Free Palestine,’ an antisemitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and Jewish people, Mohammed Sabry Soliman attacked the peaceful demonstrators with homemade Molotov cocktails,” the resolution reads. House Republicans are expected to vote on the nonbinding resolution next week.

      • KumaSudosa@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Realistically let’s start with actual control over Gaza and the West Bank and access to, you know, stuff like food, water, medicine, education, and other things considered “human rights” when it’s related to the right people. Abolishing illegal settlements would be welcomed as well.

        Israel should’ve never existed but it does and it will continue to do so.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Next up, Republicans prepare bill declaring “Black Lives Matter” is racist against white people.

      • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        1st amendment baby. Can’t be made illegal and they can’t redefine just like they can’t redefine pi as 3.14. It simply isn’t antisemitism to call for the liberation of an oppressed people.

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          And this isn’t even a law, it’s a resolution.

          That’s literally the least thing Congress can do, after just walking into the building.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        And a nonbinding bill that flies in the face of the first amendment isn’t posturing?

        We should expect better from elected officials than randos on the internet.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    What always stuck me as odd with that attack on the Israeli’s was that the cops didn’t blast that guy full of holes the moment they got there. I always thought it was a very out of character show of restraint from the same cops that shoot black children out the window of their car if they see them with a stick in their hands.

    I know it’s fucking mad to suggest such a thing, but was it a false flag attack? Intended to give some credence to future “antisemitism” measures like this?

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m not antisemitic. I know that I’m not, even if I can’t prove that to anyone who cannot see into my mind. But in words and actions, I’ve never done or said anything antisemitic.

    I believe that Palestine should be free. Passing a law isn’t going to change my mind or affect my behavior. If someone calls me antisemitic, they’re either mistaken or lying. Passing a law won’t change the truth behind their words.

    • Nate Cox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Making a statement legally classified as antisemitism opens up legal retaliation under the guise of “hate speech”, which is not protected speech.

      It doesn’t change the truth of it, but it does change he the consequences of it.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Not be contrarian, but this is a common misconception. Hate speech IS protected speech in the US, but it can be used to enhance the punishment of a related crime into a hate crime.

        It can also, under specific circumstances, be considered “fighting words”. But again, that depends on the specific context and is not broadly true.

        This is one of my least favorite facts, but it is unfortunately true

        • Nate Cox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I mean, if we’re being technical then “hate speech” isn’t a legal term at all, but I should have made it clearer that I was alleging the republicans were building their usual flimsy-as-shit-case to harass their “enemies”.

          • neatchee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            That is for sure. There is no question that it is an asinine attempt by the GOP to weaponize the law, rather than a genuine attempt at protecting Jews in any way, shape or form

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          As if it fucking matters when we have students being deported for writing an op-ed in their school newspaper suggesting Israel stop committing genocide.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Sure, call me any ugly name you choose—

      The steel of freedom does not stain.

      From those who live like leeches on the people’s lives,

      We must take back our land again,

      America!

  • hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    No human should be treated as less than another. No human should be seen as offensive to another.

    Why is Great Britain not getting so much fucking hate for how they historical contributed to this conflict? If people are wanting to legalize hate towards the humanitarian treatment of a whole territory and people, why is the nation that contributed to their existence not being criticized?

  • shouting ‘Free Palestine,’ an antisemitic slogan that calls for the destruction of the state of Israel and Jewish people

    Holy fucking Moses. It absolutely does not call for that.

    “I love X.”

    “Why do you hate and want to destroy Y, huh? You piece of shit, fuck X. Y is the best!”

  • thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Boy is my face gonna be red when they “deport” my ass because I’m Jewish. So many people in my community still think the leopards are gonna get full before eating their faces.

  • acargitz@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Remember kids, this is cheapening the word anti-Semitism and making it more and more meaningless. In the long run, this will hurt Jews. (Who do you think will be blamed by the fascists for US imperial over-extension?)

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Portraying Jews collectively, universally as perpetrators of genocide seems antisemitic and hurts Jews.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        And when you see someone conflating all Jews with the Israeli government, you are free, nay encouraged, to call that shit out.

        But guess what’s NOT happening in this thread? Or this entire comment section?

        Israel is committing genocide.

        Sincerely, your friendly neighborhood Jew

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Sorry for the misunderstanding. I’m agreeing with OP.

          The Republicans are painting Jews and warmongers. What the Republicans are doing is antisemitic.