• BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It wasn’t blue on blue. It was vested interests Vs a genuine candidate. The state of NY voted trump in, not because they like him, because they didn’t want the democrat party. This party as a tool of the corporations is finished. You’re watching it’s death throes.

    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most of the people we’re talking about are either members of the house or senate in our federal government. And our current system makes it very difficult to win or keep those specific seats unless you’re willing to be bought and paid for. Those who don’t do as they’re told will get primaried by an opponent who is much better funded. It is a system that is specifically set up to choose corrupt politicians.

      We desperately need campaign finance reform, but none of those politicians who are bought and paid for are going to honestly support it. Realistically, I don’t see any way that we’ll see it unless there is an overwhelming popular sentiment in favor of it. Where everybody is truly upset about it and politicians’ hands are forced out of fear. But I don’t see that happening in America any time soon, when half the country is voting Republican.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ve had less of the mocking “bOth SIdeS aRE thE SamE!” recently. I think more people are starting to see what we meant.

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netdeleted by creatorOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both sides are still not the same, IMO.

      Dems suck, but not remotely to the same depth as Republicans.

      I’d hold my nose and vote for Harris again if the election were tomorrow, and for the same reason as last time. (Gestures around)

      Dems run the spectrum from conservative through milquetoast to leftist. The milquetoasts seem to win most of the time.

      R is 100% bigot fascist authoritarians or people for whom those things are not a dealbreaker.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah absolutely, I think it’s also important to remember dems aren’t a monolith and many have their own takes and opinions despite often being influenced by the same harmful forces.

        For example, Jerry Nadler had a pretty strong endorsement of Mamdani despite being what I would perceive as a pretty standard democrat. I am hopeful that more democrats can be forced to support him and we can avoid this dem civil war narrative but we’ll have to see.

      • scott@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They keep us arguing over ¾ of shit that happens so that they can get the ¼ through they really car about 100% of the time.

    • doublebatterypack@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      lol

      You think things would be exactly the same if Harris were president? That is a special kind of delusion you’ve built for yourself.

      • WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point is…both sides are right wing, not to the same extent, but you’re arguing about shit versus shit like there’s some huge difference. It’s pathetic.

        • Draces@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because there is. Harris wouldn’t be illegally deporting people with secret police to death camps, openly accepting bribes like a 747 from Qatar, trying to make the Ukraine surrender, shitting all over the epa, giving the reigns to Musk to gut the government, creating a meme coin and phone company to really show how little they respect the emoluments clause there are countless examples of “huge differences” that wouldn’t fly under Democrats. Democrats suck, are extremely problematic, and need major reform/replacement but pretending they’re as bad as Republicans is so wildly disingenuous I can’t take people that say that shit seriously

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Harris wouldn’t do these things, but she would set the stage for fascists to do these things and more in 2029. Kicking the can down the road simply empowers fascists such that when (not if) they come to power they do more damage than if the bandaid had been ripped off in the first place. I mean, Biden won in 2020 and all America got was better-prepared fascists with a blueprint for how they’ll take over the United States, and as halfhearted as his attempts were at least Biden tried; Harris was only shaping up to be worse. If the only thing y’all can do is kick the can down the road, you might as well rip off the bandaid.

            • svtdragon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’ve missed the role of the Supreme Court in this. The Justices appointed by the Ds have been against the worst of it at pretty much every opportunity and they have lifetime appointments.

              That was the real cost of Trump 1.0.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The Justices appointed by the Ds have been against the worst of it at pretty much every opportunity and they have lifetime appointments.

                Yes, but Trump simply responded by de facto weakening the courts and ignoring their authority, and since he has the supreme court anyway they keep allowing him to do whatever he wants. I get what you’re trying to say, but since there was zero chance America would get enough Democrats in a row for the Supreme Court to turn blue, D-appointed judges aren’t going to make a difference in the big picture. On the other hand four years of Harris would’ve legitimized MAGA’s ideas even further as the Democrats adopted more fascist and proto-fascist policies (hello border wall) while doing less and less to distinguish themselves from fascism, undermining the left and running the country to the ground. There was only ever ruin in the direction the DNC was headed, so what this argument really boils down to is whether you wanted four more years of proto-fascism before the real deal, and while we can argue about which one would’ve the better choice voting in Harris was still going to do exactly zilch to prevent fascism. You can’t keep voting in Von Hindenburgs and think you’ll avoid Hitler.

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, those idiots who argue for the lesser evil in a bid to push the troubles to a point they arent affected by them while millions suffer are still out in force.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better than those idiots that thought voting for Trump, voting 3rd party, or not voting at all was somehow the better option and that less people would suffer than under Harris, or the lesser evil.

        • thejoker954@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least those who voted 3rd party or didn’t vote at all due to shitty candidates recognize there’s a problem and that it needs taken care of before it’s too late.

          Y’all would have us march along with “the lesser evil” to the point of no return.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Voting third party in the general election is nothing more than a performative action that directly benefits the worst candidate. Those of us that held our noses and voted for Kamala did so with the recognition that there is a problem, but we were also smart enough to know that the general is not where major changes happen.

            I’d have everyone vote for their ideal candidate in the primaries, and then vote for the best viable candidate I’m the general.

            Acting like you did something good by voting third party is akin to puffing up your chest and acting like tough shit, when all your doing is standing funny and looking like an idiot with a big chest.

  • Cypress@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they’re not with Zohran, they’re against Democracy.

    I mean this is kind of obvious at this point that the democrats and the republicans are both anti-democracy, just one covertly and the other overtly. But still. I want more people getting loud and angry at anti-democracy democrats.

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, you’re just an Islamaphobe. I know this because you’re specifically focusing on Islam, rather than every other major religion.

      • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spoken like a true chauvinist. The UK murdered tens of millions more in India alone under the guise of the values of enlightenment than Islam has in the past century and a half.

        • Bio bronk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Islam makes women 2nd class citizens it’s a guise for enslaving a whole gender. Fuck Islam. Defending it means you don’t value 50% of humans.

          • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Western chauvinism makes non-whites 2nd class citizens. It’s a guise for enslaving the whole global south. Fuck western chauvinism. Defending it means you don’t value 80% of humans.

          • shads@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah you’re right, unlike evangelical Christianity, which treats women as valuable and treasured members of society… Nah just kidding they are just ambulatory wombs that occasionally make noises as far as the evangelicals are concerned.

            I am disgusted by religion, all religions, but let’s not blind ourselves to the reality that when religion is an excuse for shitty behaviour it’s not restricted to a single religion, and its not like getting rid of the religion would remove the shitty behaviour it would just mean coming up with a new justification.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, of course. That must be why they tried ferociously to stop him from winning the primary with Islamophobic smears and are now freaking out that they failed, and why the corporate media (yes, even the “liberal” media) are all crashing out.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Here’s an article from the corporate media about the DNC’s response to Mamdani’s victory, and Here’s an article from independent leftist media about the Islamophobic attacks against him.

            I won’t include an article from right-wing media, but I’m sure you can guess how they’re coping with the electoral victory of a Muslim socialist immigrant born in Uganda to Indian parents (not well).

            The post we’re commenting under has also included some articles.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, the great DNC freakout of 2025. It was legendary. Why even Bill Clinton made such vile remarks as

          Congratulations @ZohranKMamdani on your victory in yesterday’s primary election and a well-run campaign. I’m wishing you much success in November and beyond as you work to bring New Yorkers together to tackle the city’s challenges and shape a stronger, fairer future,

          These horrible disgusting people would stop at nothing to keep them off their ticket. Except, of course, not inviting him to run on their ticket, for some reason.

          • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’re all maintaining decorum (something they would die before dropping) by congratulating him on his win while denouncing his policies and stopping short of endorsing him. Ever since his victory all the “liberal” corporate media has been praising the “energy” of his campaign while criticizing his policies as dangerous and painting his pro-palestinian views as anti-semitic. Don’t even try to pretend the way the DNC has been responding to this is normal. In nearly every other democratic primary the DNC have been quick to line up behind the victor.

    • Avicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean at this rate with about %70 of democrats saying no to Bernie’s stop arm sales motions, we can already safely assume yes they are. They have only been caring about their seats for quite a while and the deals they have made to stay on those seats do not align with the aims and interests of people like Bernie and Zohran. That is why they try to stop such candidates as ferociously as Republicans.

  • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would be absolutely hilarious if Musk actually set up his own party, financed it all the way to the Congress, got offended because people didn’t lick is arse deep enough, got kicked out for being annoying and accidentally created an actual pro-people alternative to all these corporate vampires.

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netdeleted by creatorOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Heh. Prior to this year I could not have believe such a thing was even possible. But this year…

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s basically a way for the ruling class to see whether they can be more blatant on their exploits.

      Every republican win means the people can stomach more of the squeezes.

    • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry, I’m sure that if moderate Democrats succeed in their rabid crusade against Zohran and he gets defeated then they’ll turn around and say it was because we didn’t back Cuomo 1000% and without criticism, going back through your comment history and quoting this comment back to you every time you share any political opinion whatsoever.

      But they’re super serious about opposing Trump, pinky promise.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can assure you that the Democrat candidate Zohran Mamdani is going to be infinitely better than the Republican Sliwa.

  • FriskyDingo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s funny how hot Gillibrand got over Zohran, but hasn’t really said a peep in the last 5ish months of all… this.

    It’s certainly curious.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like how she just invented her own hysterical interpretation of the interview where zohran wouldn’t condemn people for saying globalize the intifada, and then when confronted with the actual quote from zohran, including the “I won’t become mayor to be the word police,” and she takes that and says “actually, you DO have to be word police, you have to tell people its unacceptable to say things that other people may interpret as calling for the slaughter of millions of jews, even if you know those phrases mean something completely different from how jews feel about it”

      The interviewer at that point is like well he didn’t say that and what he said doesn’t imply the killing of jews but okay youre clearly just a violently racist woman so lets take a question from a caller and end the interview

      I hope she resigns if he wins, if not then her next election should be her last. Disgusting, hateful, disqualifying behavior from this woman in that interview.

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s like how Disney makes a big deal about being progressive while making a movie about a space cop who uses her weapons to intimidate indigenous populations.

  • freewheel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For some of us, the 2016 Democratic primary was quite illuminating. I’m glad to see people are catching up finally.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      sO yOu ArE sAyInG “bOtH sIDeS eQuAlLy BaD”?!?!?!

      cOnGrAtULaTiOnS oN gEtTiNg TrUmP eLeCtEd!! :(

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like the second you notice parallels in our two party system, they misrepresent you as saying they are EXACTLY the same in EVERY REGARD.

        Meanwhile, we no longer question why we only have two parties to vote for in the first place. Hint: the two parties keep it that way.