Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

  • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    He’s got some things going for him. Male. Presumably heterosexual. Caucasian. Old (but perhaps not quite old enough). I say go for it.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I hate this persistent belief that much of America is still too racist and sexist to accept a black or woman president. I hate it, even if it may be true.

        • unphazed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Unfortunately we see the country as better than it really is, or at least, I DID. After the election I saw how many people wanted to kick people out of the country because they believe immigrants are bad. Then they seem to have no problem with a South African immigrant pulling the strings. Immigrants weren’t the problem with them, but the skin color. We did it before we became a country in the 1600s, and we’ll continue doing it, because we love believing that our skin color makes us superior.

  • Kcap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m feeling pretty certain the dems will run Buttigieg. Feels like they’ve been prepping him for a while.

    • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The things Walz has accomplished in his time in Minnesota is actually remarkable, especially given Minnesota’s traditionally libertarian/purple local politics.

      Literally the only attack Republicans in Minnesota have is his handling of the George Floyd protests and his COVID response, and those are weak and they know it.

      Under him we here in Minnesota got dozens of extremely progressive policies put though, our social programs have dramatically expanded and are extremely well funded, corruption has been rooted out, and our economy is booming. The Minnesota DFL under his leadership have gained a ton of ground as well, where nationally the DNC has given up a ton.

      No, he isn’t a great orator or debater. But as a politician and policy maker he’s a rare combination of progressive, well respected, and effective.

      • bradd@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Tulsi Gabbard would have won vs Trump in 2024, had the DNC let her run, I guarantee it. Just one example.

          • bradd@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            This kind of thinking is exactly why you have Trump. You can’t except a moderate, so you get an extremist, sometimes it’s not your extremist.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Tulsi is complete shit who nobody likes outside of her little fanclub/cult. She would not have won and even if she had she’s barely any better than Trump, and possibly worse. She’s an opportunistic right-wing shill who says whatever’s politically advantageous to advance her own career.

              • bradd@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Your opinions are wrong and I’ll prove it to you: Trump is president.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah, because the Dems ran a “moderate” like you wanted. You just didn’t get your particular shitty opportunist cult leader.

                  Trump being president in no way proves either of the points of

                  • Tulsi not being dogshit and just as bad as Trump

                  • Tulsi actually being able to win

                  Typical Tulcel deflecting all criticism back to “Dems bad” no matter what the criticism is or where it’s coming from.

  • aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Oh yes, please, older people, maybe I’ll have my late great grandma run a campaign for the democrats from her grave.

    Edit: not that I prefer a republican after trump. I’m certainly not far right. But I’m tired of seeing running leaders being this old. Can you americans get AOC to run for once?

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      No sooner than he mentions that he might run to the right wing attacks on his age begin.

      I’d like someone younger too but let’s take the candidates we can eh? Dude’s compassionate and far left for a dam at the moment.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        And I’m sure he’ll choose a young running mate (AOC maybe? Though I’d hate to see her leave Congress for such a powerless position).

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      wha? I thought it was known that walz was actually pretty young (60) compared to how he looks lol. Definitely on the older side of average age for president looking at the stats, but he’s 2 years younger than jon stewart and even gavin newsom is 57.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Run for president in 2028” XD That ship has sailed. I don’t think they will have any more elections.

    • yankfreelive@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      You’re talking to americans, dude. They sure want to win, but they also need to kill brown people abroad, it’s good for the economy.

      Americans are inherently genocidal, that’s how it got their country. They are simply unable to comprehend foreigners as human beings.

  • Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Would have wanted him as president nominee either way, hope he gets it. The name Tim Walz is a name that needs to go down in history with the title “saviour of the US” or smth like that

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Idk who needs to hear this, but Tim Walz is pretty moderate and centrist. You’re not going to unite the splintered left with Tim Walz.

    The biggest barrier Democrats have is that left leaning voters are not going out and voting for them.

    • Spaniard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have not much clue about american names except the most popular but what about running with Bernie or AOC as VP?

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Bernie generally runs in the Primaries but so far has not won a primary, I’m honestly not sure if a presidential candidate can run as a VP after losing the primary, but it’s whoever wins sole discretion who they choose as their VP so AOC is definitely an option.

        Something else to keep in mind is that a congressman who wins Presidency has to leave their seat in congress, which means blue -1 for either senate or house at least until the vacancy gets filled and at most until they win that district again.

        • Spaniard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thanks for the explanation but specially for this

          Something else to keep in mind is that a congressman who wins Presidency has to leave their seat in congress, which means blue -1 for either senate or house at least until the vacancy gets filled and at most until they win that district again.

          A very important thing to take into account.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        To me the left is a collection of policy stances:

        • tax the rich
        • singlepayer healthcare
        • employees rights and benefits
        • regulations against all forms of malice and negligience
        • body autonomy

        So the vast majority of the DNC and especially their presidential candidates check every box and these stances poll at like 60-90%. Generally more states follow this creed than not, such as California, but some things like healthcare are a little too complicated to do for a single state but the best states are blue such as Hawaii.

        If 60-90% back the stance but not the party which holds it then you don’t have a problematoc party you have an information problem and an intelligence problem.

  • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d vote for him but he’d need to ignore the consultants next time if he wants any hope of winning.

  • FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Personally, I’m hoping Zelensky will run for US president after strong Dien in Ukraine. You might be thinking that someone from another country can’t be president. Well… looks at current situation in White House At least this one would be elected.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    We know that female candidates with male VP’s named Tim don’t win against Republicans. Hillary and Kamala proved that. But this is wholly different, so its possible, concievable…