𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠

  • 0 Posts
  • 341 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 16th, 2023

help-circle
  • I’m not saying all schizophrenics are prone to be Nazis, don’t put words in my mouth. I’m well aware of what the Nazis did.

    I’m saying that West’s schizophrenia is likely making him prone to Nazi sympathies, evidenced by his apparent lack of those sympathies when he is on his meds. In his case these two are very strongly correlated. Schizophrenia is a very complex mental disease that manifests differently in different people. We don’t know exactly what goes on in his head, but we know he isn’t sound of mind. Hitler is theorized to have had a form of paranoid schizophrenia too. West specifically seems to believe that black people are “the real jews” and that Hitler was therefore right to kill the “imposters” or something stupid. The reasoning he presents does fit with paranoid schizophrenia.

    To be clear, schizophrenia is a disease that we know how to manage, and most schizophrenics do so just fine. West in particular is an idiot for not taking his meds. And of course his diagnosis doesn’t absolve him from the responsibility of his actions. But they are clearly related in his case.

    He is also egotistical and seems to have some kind of messiah-complex. That does appear to just be him being a piece of shit.





  • The reason for that is that surgeons are rated based on their success percentages meaning they’ll recommend against risky surgeries.

    The upside of this is that surgeons aren’t operating willy-nilly on people and will make a proper risk assessment. The downside is that overweight people have an inherently higher risk of complications from surgery, so some surgeons will pass.

    It’s not because they think these people don’t need it, it’s because they think it’s too risky. They’re usually not wrong about that, you just need to find a surgeon willing to take the risk or, if possible, reduce the risk by losing weight.




  • Daily Duotrigordle #1166 Guesses: 37/37 3️⃣5️⃣ 0️⃣6️⃣ 0️⃣7️⃣ 3️⃣6️⃣ 3️⃣3️⃣ 1️⃣2️⃣ 1️⃣4️⃣ 1️⃣5️⃣ 1️⃣6️⃣ 0️⃣3️⃣ 3️⃣0️⃣ 2️⃣2️⃣ 3️⃣4️⃣ 2️⃣6️⃣ 2️⃣5️⃣ 1️⃣9️⃣ 2️⃣4️⃣ 2️⃣9️⃣ 1️⃣8️⃣ 2️⃣0️⃣ 3️⃣2️⃣ 3️⃣1️⃣ 2️⃣8️⃣ 2️⃣3️⃣ 1️⃣7️⃣ 1️⃣3️⃣ 0️⃣5️⃣ 0️⃣9️⃣ 0️⃣8️⃣ 2️⃣1️⃣ 2️⃣7️⃣ 3️⃣7️⃣ https://duotrigordle.com/

    Down to the wire, got a little bit lucky as I had two options for the final two words and no more free guesses. Thankfully I guessed correctly!


  • I know that nuclear and hydro can constantly cover it, the point is that when it’s very sunny out countries with good solar adoption will already 100% cover it (if not more). The nuclear power at those times has to compete with cheaper solar power, which it loses on price. And because the grid can’t handle more supply than demand, it requires shutting something off. The cheapest power is solar so you’d prefer to keep that on for economic reasons, but since nuclear is bad at scaling up and down you have to pick the more expensive option. This increases energy prices beyond what is really necessary.

    This also becomes even less tenable as battery adoption increases.




  • Except people will just purchase their own solar, because it’s cheaper than getting nuclear power from a battery. They won’t wait for demand to catch up, they’ll make sure their own demand is fulfilled so they won’t have to purchase power anymore.

    It’s a simple economic rule, if there’s a cheaper option people wi shift towards it. You can’t force people to purchase your power. You can’t stop it unless you ban buying solar, which won’t be received well.

    Nuclear fills a rapidly shrinking niche in the power mix of tomorrow, and it’s economics that’s squeezing it out. There’s no point in fighting that unless you want to pay more for power than is necessary (which nobody does).





  • The problem with using nuclear as baseload is that people have the wrong idea of what is required from a baseload power source.

    A baseload power source’s most important quality isn’t constant output, it’s rapidly adaptable output.

    When it comes to cost, nothing beats solar. It’s cheap, it’s individually owned and especially with a battery the self-sufficiency basically means not paying for power anymore. So, people will adopt solar at greater numbers as the cost of solar panels is still dropping.

    Solar and wind at peak times in several countries already exceed the demand. Nuclear, which is more expensive to run, now has a problem, because nobody wants to buy that energy. They’d rather get the cheaper abundant renewable power.

    So, the nuclear reactor has to turn off or at least scale to a minimal power output during peak renewable hours. This historically is something nuclear reactors are just not good at. But even worse, it’s a terrible economic prospect: nuclear is barely profitable as-is, having to turn it off for half the day kills the economic viability completely. Ergo, government subsidies are required to keep it operational.

    Flexibility is king in the power network of the future. That means batteries or natural gas plants at the moment. Nuclear can be useful for nations without those and with a lagging renewable adoption, but it will be more expensive in the long run. It will also become more important to do heavy industrial tasks during peak renewable hours, so that the demand better matches the output.