Both opinions agree that you should not vote for Obama, that is the editorial strategy, the different motivations are to capture the whole range of voters.

Nowadays it is even easier to do this, thank to personalized news. They can tell unemployed people that immigrants are stealing all the jobs, while they can tell taxpayers that immigrants are leaving off grants. They can even tell cat lovers that immigrants are eating all the cats.

The idea you are pushing that Op-Eds are a whiteboard for diverse opinions is either innocent or malicious.

yes, different levels of maturity of the technology attract different profiles.

Gutenberg wanted to spread the word, Murdoch is in the hate business

Devil’s advocate here, it could be metaphorically, pipeline implies that it is an unavoidable sequence, rather than a progression, which it is.

edit, I agree with the below that it is more of a replacement

But vanishing is magic, it goes against the laws of physics, so you could apply any fictional logic

If the mass vanishes, then the gravity would also vanish, at the same time.

The gravity does not travel, the gravity is.

No, they are fine with diversity, the problem is inclusion.

I heard it from racists: “I am not racists, I am just organized”

They love a world where people with another skin tone are subordinated.

I had to google Clydesdale, not disappointed

Aktshually it seems like a very uneffective method.

you cannot eat pedantry

You will prove that one god exists?

Or even less, you will prove that someone with god-like powers exists?

Or even less, you will prove tat we live in a simulation written by some christian sect.

It’s about sending a massege

they are rougher but they sure feel more authentic, human and original, which is the whole point