cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agoWhy indeedlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square188linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkWhy indeedlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square188linkfedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoExcept… the compilation step doesn’t add type safety to JS. As an aside, type safety hasn’t been something I truly miss in JS, despite how often it’s mentioned.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoI think they are talking about typescript which is compiled into javascript
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoOk, that could be true. I assumed they meant the “building” phase that some frameworks go through.
Except… the compilation step doesn’t add type safety to JS.
As an aside, type safety hasn’t been something I truly miss in JS, despite how often it’s mentioned.
I think they are talking about typescript which is compiled into javascript
Ok, that could be true. I assumed they meant the “building” phase that some frameworks go through.