• lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    For the sake of neutrality of the art, even propaganda pieces should be considered even if not accepted.

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Paradox of tolerance.

      In other words, abso-fucking-lutely not. Fuck sake, you wanna platform this shit cause…art?!

      Fuck no, dude. Get your head out of your ass.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You sound like someone who’s never heard of the “Streisand effect”.

        Maybe you should get your head out of your own ass so you don’t miss those type of things.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, no. If the film takes a stance on an issue, or advocates for a certain point of view, but isn’t upfront about it, it shouldn’t be considered.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m sorry, but that seems way too broad. Film is an art form and excluding metaphor from it would really limit its range.

    • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is no neutrality of art. Art is a reflection of it’s maker. The maker of this piece of shit is, unsurprisingly, a piece of shit, and it should roundly be rejected for what it is.