alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agoAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squarefibojoly@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoHow the fuck does that graph even works?! Shows the very left of the graph, then says you’re in the top? Doesn’t make any sense.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI am going to believe this is comedy gold.
minus-squareseang96@spgrn.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month ago85% of people have that IQ or higher. Maybe they do it this way so those that don’t get it don’t feel sad about the results?
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoi hate how IQ tests use both percentages and percentiles for the results
minus-squaremy_hat_stinks@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoIt says top 85%. In a room with 100 people the 85th smartest person would be in the top 85% but they’d also be in the bottom 15%.
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoTop 85% could mean bottom 15% (±1%)
How the fuck does that graph even works?! Shows the very left of the graph, then says you’re in the top? Doesn’t make any sense.
I am going to believe this is comedy gold.
85% of people have that IQ or higher. Maybe they do it this way so those that don’t get it don’t feel sad about the results?
i hate how IQ tests use both percentages and percentiles for the results
It says top 85%. In a room with 100 people the 85th smartest person would be in the top 85% but they’d also be in the bottom 15%.
Top 85% could mean bottom 15% (±1%)