• So, sundar pinchai can be added to the list of CEOs that suck?

    Because a lot of the time, it’s weird that when the company does nasty shit, nobody names him as the head asshole in charge the way that other companies and ceos get handled.

    The dude has been in the driver’s seat for pretty much every major deterioration of Google/alphabet for years.

  • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren’t so damn overdue. They don’t even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

    Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

    • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Google search feels like it has stopped being the magic it was. Now whenever I search for something I might not find it underneath all the stuff on sale. For the first time in I don’t know how many years I’ve been finding myself using something else like Duck Duck Go.

        • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I used to use Google shopping to find certain items and compare websites. Now the entire left side that used to be a filter list is replaced. When you click a “filter” option it just adds text to the search bar. Then it will include an essay about why these are your options for something and recommend top brands, but then just list everything.

      • AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yep, that’s intentional. They stopped prioritizing user experience and started prioritizing ad revenue instead a while ago

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      What’s wrong with Golang? Agrees on all other points, and perhaps this one as well

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        and yet somehow google made it worse. Not only are there more ads than ever before, but now it’s also a panopticon.

    • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If as many people as possible self host their own peertube, even for just your own videos, it wouldn’t replace youtube completely, but it would be a giant leap in the right direction.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Even most people hosting at home, which is already an incredibly small bubble, have only the default upload of something like 40Mbit which is more than plenty for internet usage and thus the only thing most providers supply, since people favour download speeds. You usually have to specifically order increased uploads speed, which not enough people do to build something that could serve as an alternative to youtube

            • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Idk what to tell you man, I was just saying it would be cool if more people made a personal Peertube. Didn’t say everyone and their mother needed to make one, just that it would be nice if as many people as possible could make one. Again, I get that it can be hard, or not possible for most people, but if more people could make one, and made one, that would be cool.

              • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                And I agree wholeheartedly. I’m just saying, that the idea of replacing YouTube with something federated fails due to lack of upload speeds, as cool as it would be. Still, having it even just as a small scale alternative would be cool

    • Walican132@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Any suggestions where to go? I mostly watch warhammer painting content such as tutorials for techniques I don’t know and video game content either long form retrospectives to fall asleep or guides for what I am playing. I’ve tried to get off YouTube completely but these specific niches are all that’s left for me.

        • Walican132@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thanks. I can def do that on my phone. Don’t know much about how to do it on Apple TVs or Rokus but I very seldom use them for YouTube anymore anyway.

    • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Judging a captive market for not being able to break free from a monopoly is just another form of oppression, buddy.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      What else has such a catalog? Going to be hard to persuade creators to host their own content with ads and subscriptions.

      • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s not an easy answer, but the best way I’ve found so far is to use GrayJay.

        If I find that one of the content creators I follow on YouTube happen to post their content on any other platform, I switch my subscription to that platform.

        Besides YouTube they support Nebula, Twitch, Odysee, PeerTube, Dailymotion, Bitchute, Kick, BiliBili, Rumble, Patreon, and more.

        • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Some of those, particularly Odysee and Rumble have much worse Nazis. They are the platforms of choice for British National Socialist Movement and Patriotic Alternative.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not just catalog for viewing. What other platform can I use as cloud storage for video files for free? I have hundreds of hours of stuff uploaded there.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            They are all stored on local hdds, in fact I have two copies locally. I said it’s my cloud storage, my backup off site.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Except I do, because I don’t have off site storage. 3-2-1 my friend. If my house burnt down, without the cloud storage I’d lose everything. Separate local copies is good for defending against disk failure.

                • Ember James@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  If your data isn’t worth a few bucks to secure maybe it isn’t worth the redundancies in the first place. Keep making excuses and hope they keep allowing you to access your data “for free” or at all.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          What other platform can I use as cloud storage for video files for free?

          None. YouTube included.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I mean, I do use YT as cloud storage for free. And before you say the “nothing is free line,” note my other replies.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Nope. The admin of sh.itjust.works lets you use their storage for free. Google does not.

              There are things that are free, Youtube is not one of them.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Okay, as I said in my other replies, the videos are unlisted, not monetized, and I don’t pay for it. What is not free about that?

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Is money is the only thing about yourself that you ascribe value to?

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          What other platform can I use as cloud storage for video files for free?

          If it’s free, you are the product (ad views), not the consumer (ad sales). Suck it up and pay for hard drives.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I have many hard drives, and none of the videos are monetized or even publically listed. As I said, it’s my cloud storage, my offsite backup.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              And I’m saying you’re not paying for it, and that’s the problem. Everyone got way too comfortable with getting “free” shit from corporations that would trample our rights the second it became convenient for them.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                If I’m using YT as cloud backup storage for hundreds of hours of video that is unlisted, unmonetized, how am I helping them trample rights?

                • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Their ability to trample rights because of how much profit they make from horrible content is directly related to their ability to give you that space for free. “I’m not directly contributing” is a real weak excuse to keep using it, in my personal opinion.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe people could read more?

        Nobody needs this endless “content” slop.

        For real people need to get a grip if they can’t survive without it. They’re addicted.

        • drre@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          totally agree with reading more. text is easy to consume, easy to store, (somewhat) easy to verify (if sources are provided), and it keeps (if using dead trees for storage). ever since the pandemic i started reading more and must say i really like it

        • warm@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          There’s an incredible amount of educational and fun content on YouTube, just because you watch slop and it’s associated recommendations, doesn’t mean I or others do.

        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hmm yes I’ll just read about how cool two bullets hitting each other in slowmotion looks. Much better experience than watching it /s

        • Horse shit.

          Reading vs TV was a tired debate in the eighties. YouTube is no different than tv. Hell, in some ways, because it isn’t all controlled by oligarchs entirely, I would argue that it’s easier to find good things on YouTube than it ever was on broadcast or cable tv.

          Also, ablist much? How about the blind and dyslexic? Are they fucked just because you don’t like that format?

          Yeah, fuck YouTube as a platform, and fuck Google/alphabet, but don’t pretend to be the arbiter of entertainment.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            How about the blind and dyslexic

            Last I checked braille exists and so do tools for dyslexic readers. There are literally braille terminals for the blind. Hell, the first time I saw one was in the film Sneakers in 1992.

            It’s actually very easily argued that the push to touch-screen and video everything is what is actually ableist and making braille be used far less because companies are more worried about what’s cheap than what is actually useful.

          • Aphelion@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Nebula doesn’t have that kind of ‘popular’ YouTubers, it’s a creator-made platform that’s more focused on science and documentary channels. I don’t think I’ve seen anything on Nebula even remotely related to gaming.

            • 0k_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              There’s definitely gaming content on there, but what I’ve seen has been of the long-form analysis type.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Most of them are literally Nazis. Anytime I go to youtube and finish a video all the suggested videos to watch after are obscene “anti-woke” trash.

            The youtube to right-wing pipeline is real.

            EDIT:

            Here’s after me watching an old Lightning Bolt music video. Six videos are related to Lightning Bolt, being live videos or music videos, but a solid four videos are all weird right-wing Nazi pipeline shit. One defending Trump and saying he has a plan, one lamenting the pushback against Tesla, one shitting on the new Snow White for being “woke,” and one literally with the giant title “fuck your pronouns.” Plus one old cartoon and an episode of Surrounded with one doctor vs. twenty anti-vax (I am not convinced this Surrounded show actually does anything helpful for any discourse.) I have watch history disabled so none of this comes from my watch history, this is the default that youtube gives to people.

            • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              MSN is also terrible about this shit. I turned off their new tab garbage and replaced it with Bonjourr right before the election because of all the misinformation it was showing. Crazy we just accept this shit man.

              As for YouTube, this is very easy to verify. Sign out of YouTube > CTRL+F5 > look at the top viewed videos

              You will see what garbage most of the populace sees when they go to YouTube without logging in. I believe this is the real reason they don’t care if people log in or not. They can push the narrative while seeming like they’re being good guys by allowing you to consume content “for free”.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Weird.
              Mine is just Anime, vtuber, tech (the good kind) and edutainment (e.g. kurzgesagt, real engineering, ezc.).

              Maybe you engage heavily in political content because I mostly avoid it like the plague.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I have watch history disabled

                Man how many people fail to fucking read this is literally re-enforcing my point that maybe more people need to read. This me, quoting myself, from above. Further, someone else made the same kind of comment over a half hour ago and I responded the same, noting that I had already mentioned that I have watch history disabled, so Youtube does not and cannot give me recommendations based on my watch history.

                I actually almost never watch Youtube except for the odd video game trailer or random comedy-shit-post-snippet. I don’t have any subscriptions or channels I care about. I read.

            • NotNotMike@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              The top right video is a video absolutely dumpstering Tesla and calling it a worthless stock. Your recommendations will also highly depend on what video you were just watching, could it be that users who watch your video also happen to watch these other videos? Is that the platforms fault?

                • sasquatch7704@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Funny think about that.

                  I also had it disabled, started watching a longer(ish) video, closed the video and enabled history and somehow YouTube knew how much I already watched before history was on.

                  So my guess is that history off is only for the user, YouTube knows anyway, it just pretends not to store it

                • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Well, that might be the cause. Kinda scary you get recommendations like that just due to no history.

            • lemonaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              You’re correct but the “He has a plan” one is from Money & Macro, a leftist (Marxist-friendly) economics channel. He’s trying to explain the broader strategy behind the tariffs, which (from skimming the video) seems similar to a theory Yanis Varoufakis had as well. I think it’s much simpler than that though… I think they’re just a sloppy way to appear tough on the world stage while crashing the economy so the ultrarich can pick up the pieces, but that’s just me.

              Anyway you’re correct about the rest I think. And tbh even one pipeline video in the top recommended is too many.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              None of that has anything to do with the creators on Nebula or the Nebula platform itself.

        • no banana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sadly I couldn’t get it to stream reliably though it’s been a few months since I unsubscribed.

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The only way to pay for subscription is with a credit card, no thank you, my culture mostly doesn’t use those and I don’t have or want one.

          • tomenzgg@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            First I’m hearing but that doesn’t surprise me; it’s probably better than most companies you could give your money to but, in any way they could, they don’t do anything truly groundbreaking such that I can justify to myself giving money rather than just keeping said money in my pocket (and, in turn, much more likely to go to mutual aid, charities, non-profits, or coöperatively-owned or union-backed businesses).

            They could have done a more traditional coöp, open-sourced their infrastructure (even if it was just the app.!), or really emphasized a particular stance or message they as a company would stand by…but they haven’t done any of those. They basically are just offering up YouTube but as a streaming service. But that doesn’t solve the myriad of issues that make a streaming service a business that (like most businesses) prey on their customers.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      not just stop, rip every half decent video from there and save it somewhere else. Losing everything in youtube is library of alexandria level loss.

    • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I recommend you take strides to learn how propaganda works, most specifically the purpose of shifting opinion (i.e. the Overton Window): “I’m just asking questions” and “I’ll let anyone speak” are two of the most effective methods of propaganda. It does not need to be intentional on the part of the interviewer.

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Your problem is that you want to censor ideas you don’t like.

          This is a natural result of media controlled by corporate interests. It’s also a misunderstanding of “free speech” – even when you are free to say what you will, it does not mean you are free from the consequences of that speech.

          You want to control what other people think by dictating what they get to see and what they’re allowed to share with others.

          Again, I suggest looking into how propaganda works. Letting everyone speak about anything (without vetting of topic, qualifications, or direction) has consequences. We are seeing those consequences now and will continue to see more as the propaganda machine runs wild on the back of “let everyone speak”.

          Your view of this is overly simplistic and I am, in the most polite way, attempting to direct you to self improvement. It is a common issue at the moment across all discourse – probably vestigial of the information sharing capabilities now available.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          no, when you obviously spouting misinformation its within peoples rights not to give you time of thier day. and thats why you would be banned in reddit surely as here eventually for the right reasons.

        • nexguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Companies censor ideas all the time. McDonald’s employees don’t tell their customers how ugly they are… it’s against company policy. Youtube is a company that can implement whatever company policies they like and if you don’t like it you can go somewhere else.

        • Muyal_Hix@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It is kinda bad. Especially when it comes to finding content or getting noticed

        • AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, and the platform is set up in a way that hinders onboarding and discoverability of what’s there (at least, compared to youtube’s approach…). These are all problems that prevent it from replacing YouTube. If you read Peertube’s official site they even say upfront that they’re not trying to be a YouTube replacement

      • nibble4bits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s always a question of money. It costs money to make quality content. YouTube has content because they share ad revenue to their content providers. That expands the more popular the content is because there are more ads displayed. That revenue lets the creators expand their capabilities with better gear and stage sets. Federated networks usually depend initially on volunteers and alternative ways of earning revenue for those instances besides ads.

        • moonbunny@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s even more difficult since the content has to be stored somewhere, and needs to be streamed which requires storage and processing power, with the latter needing to be able to scale so the user experience doesn’t get bogged down by new people joining.

          The entire revenue model of compensating the host and content creator does require a rethink, but it’s hard to see how that could be done without paywalling access to host, view, and/or both of the above.

        • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Tbh money could be the initiative. So many content creators nowadays have platforms beside YouTube. Often even self hosted weboages. If a federated alternative would come up, they could just set up an own server and keep all the earnings.

          This would somehow need to get started though. No idea how.

  • obvs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    What international alternatives exist for YouTube? And I understand RedNote as an alternative for TikTok, but YouTube fills a little bit of a different niche.

      • Breadly@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Allas, if you want to stay away from YouTube, you’ll also want to stay away from Dailymotion. This platform is owned by Vincent Bolloré who is also the owner of the “Groupe Canal” (which includes “CNews”, the french equivalent to Fox News) and a number of different far-right media. Moving to Dailymotion is not exacly what I would call a smart one.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        feel like thats specific to pirated media. i remember i watch pirated shows on there all the time.

      • missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think it’s possible for PeerTube to scale to a size where it would be capable of competing with Youtube.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          PeerTube is just software. It’s a decentralized network. It doesn’t have to scale to that size. You can have a million servers handling the storage and streaming in a more efficient method and democratize the bandwidth.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Hosts and users who want their stuff available to their audience without YouTube’s bullshit.

            • mesamunefire@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Same people that pay for lemmy. Us.

              It doesn’t take much to host peertube TBH. And with each peertube instance, the videos get easier to host. It scales very well with the current iteration of software.

              The two biggest issues are actually not software related:

              1. A platform is only as good as its users (creators and users who interact). Peertube has the issue that its not very popular, so creators have to really plug their stuff.
              2. Its not profitable for creators UNLESS they add a way to monetize. Some argue that with secondary sources such as patreon, its not an issue, But I just don’t see it.

              Im pretty happy with what it does NOW. I like the ability to post my videos and get comments without getting flagged for whatever on Youtube. I like my friends and family (and sometimes us weirdos) looking at my videos. And I like the slow trickle of people hosting their videos on say makertube, peertube.wtf, and other such platforms. They seem like really fun individuals and im having a blast.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                The two biggest issues are actually not software related

                I disagree, the biggest issues are related to discoverability, and most certainly software-related.

                Peertube has the issue that its not very popular, so creators have to really plug their stuff.

                Not necessarily. They only need to agree to allow an instance to mirror their content, and possibly one day contribute something to it in the event that it becomes popular enough. For now, consent is really all that’s required. The only revenue they’re missing out on is AdSense.

                Its not profitable for creators UNLESS they add a way to monetize. Some argue that with secondary sources such as patreon, its not an issue, But I just don’t see it.

                Patreon is one of many different ways to generate revenue. Most popular Youtubers are diversifying in various ways. The most effective of which is creating their own products and using their channels to promote them. Affiliate links/codes is another way smaller creators can diversify.

                I like the ability to post my videos and get comments without getting flagged for whatever on Youtube.

                As always, with freedom comes abuse. Youtube has a lot of regulations that can be cumbersome but also can protect creators and users.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          User experience can be improved pretty easily.

          The important parts are already there.

          • kat@orbi.camp
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Easier said than done. Reason after all these years it still hasn’t been addressed.

              • kat@orbi.camp
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                As an engineer with almost 2 decades of experience (including streaming sites)… It is.

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Well, we’d have to be more specific about what parts of the “user experience” we’re talking about here in order to make that assessment.

                  I’m mostly talking about discoverability, the default algorithms, the lack of federation, and a way to actually filter content by language.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      There really isn’t one. That’s why they feel that they can do whatever they feel like. They have no real competition for the type of service they offer.

    • thisfro@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Peertube is the obvious candidate, but I’m not sold on the content.

      I use nebula.tv, many of the creators I like are there too. You pay somerhing, but their business model is not too bad imho.

      Floatplane is somewhat similar, but LMG is involved, which I don’t love.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    When an influential group of powerful people make hate speech a part of their standard rhetoric, is EXACTLY when you MUST block it on your platform, not a signal that it’s time to start letting it slide, you fucking pricks.

    • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pichai kissed the ring. He’s colluding with the person who tried to overturn the elections and install himself as a ruler.

      All of the billionaires that were at the inauguration are in the same boat. I’m at a point where I believe the crimes of any of them should be tried and convicted with the punishments being doled out collectively to all colluders, but that’s me.

      I’d be going for the death penalty from the prosecution side, since it seems like that is what we do now to people who cause one or more people to die, no matter how unethical the victim(s) were.

      • vga@sopuli.xyzBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wonder if Tim Cook is there too. It would make sense for him and Apple to resist this at least somehow but…

  • PerfectDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    And people judged me for watching YouTube with uBlock Origin, or via NewPipe for eons.

    Look who’s laughing now.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      YouTube on mobile is intolerable these days. NewPipe is the way for Android, though Google is in a constant battle to disable it.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      youtube is too infested with ads, to make me disable ublock origin for my favorite channels. in anycase most of the channels become greedy pos overtime anyways. outside of pet one/animals/stem ones, ones that are just gossip or reaction or like mr beasts videos are no good.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Those aren’t opinions I would care about in the first place. Somebody thinks you should be watching ads? WTF?

    • Trihilis@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good lord, the amount of idiots that white knighted me for using uBlock.

      “WOULD U WORK FOR FREEEEE???”

      Like fuck off no I wouldn’t. I also dont buy up every other company I see, turn it to shit and then try to force a political agenda through it, and guess who IS doing that using billions of dollars? Yep, Google.

  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    That is why centralized platforms, especially powerful ones, are sitting ducks waiting to become even more corrupt. Why more people are not leaving centralized services is a crime against humanity as it is clear that supporting theme means society suffers.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The ‘not leaving centralized services’ thing isn’t really helped when there’s basically no other viable alternatives, like is the case with YT. PeerTube exists, sure, but it’s a content desert, sadly.

      Now, if PeerTube had more content to choose from…

      Really though, Reddit, Meta, Twitter, and Discord all have viable decentralized alternatives in the form of Lemmy, Pixelfed, Mastodon (Mastodon serving as an alternative for both Facebook and Twitter), and Matrix respectively, why can’t PeerTube serve as a truly viable decentralized alternative for YT?

      Even Linux is in its glow-up arc as a viable Windows alternative lately ffs, and I’m glad to have been on that bandwagon for years before that platform started gaining mainstream attention.

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s frightening. Why do people not make an effort to leave Reddit?

      How can the same people run a dictatorship of the proletariat? Even democracy, I don’t see how society as a whole can avoid being manipulated.

  • cotlovan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    As i signed up for this sub, I thought I’d be reading about technology. Actually, it seems that people here are more concerned about companies not sticking to the far left ideology, so naturally they call everyone nazis and fascists, without ever knowing what those words even mean.

    Just because someone doesn’t want to play the gender tip toe dance, doesn’t mean they’re nazis. But I guess that’s not something that this sub is ready to face.

    • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      nazis and fascists, without ever knowing what those words even mean

      I am Jack’s complete lack of self awareness

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Just your garden variety bigots and assholes then?

      Also, I think you should read up on what facisim is and why it’s being so widely used right now as highly oppressive rhetoric is being pushed from many far-right leaders throughout the world.

      • cotlovan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I know exactly what fascism means, and often what the left is doing aligns better with the definition than what the right is doing. Also, let’s not forget that “nazi” is a short form for “national socialism”

      • cotlovan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Your reply and your up votes just prove what I said. You’re not allowed to disagree with the rhetoric around here.

        • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, you’re definitely allowed. Otherwise you’d have had your comments removed from the public discourse.

          The up and downs just gauge public approval to the comment. Remember, you’re also free to up and down vote to voice your disagreement.

          Also remember, if you think everyone around you are assholes then likely you’re the asshole.

          Edit: I just saw your other comment on the lack of variety of posts. Be the change you want to see. Find something interesting and make a post!

        • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Sure, if your issue is that it’s okay for corporations to remove protections for hate speech towards marginalized groups, then yes, go get bent. This kind of false equivalence between normalizing hate and ostraciszing progressives for speaking out against oppression is EXACTLY what we’re fighting against. What in the hell is the ‘rhetoric’ do you disagree with? Having empathy for lgbtq+ people? Jesus. If so, this is definitely not the place for you.

          • cotlovan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Speaking about false equivalence, how did you came to the conclusion that just because I don’t find a corporation removing gender stuff from their policies relevant from a technological stand point - makes me an LGBT hater? You seem to already have made your mind, you probably did assume that I’m a trump supporter who wanna see gays being hanged, even though I was saying that I expected more tech and less gender politics from this sub.

            There are a lot of subs dedicated to LGBT, I came here for tech. Which sub would in your opinion be more appropriate for tech talk if not this one?

            • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              When big Tech, especially the biggest video platform in the world, does something like this it is relevant to tech. The better question is, if you do support lgbtq+ people, why the public freakout about mentioning a far reaching tech policy, by one of the biggest (if not THE biggest) tech company in the world, on a tech sub?

        • Suite404@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          You are welcome to disagree and people are welcome to tell you off. That’s how speech works. Or should we tip to around disagreeing with you?

          • cotlovan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Of course everyone is allowed to speak their mind. But being called names for not supporting a particular point of view sounds like hate speech to me, wouldn’t you agree?

            • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              abusive or threatening speech or writing that expresses prejudice on the basis of ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or most importantly against people who have just the worst takes.

              Hmmm, checks out. I guess the technology platform, YouTube, should get right on that too.

            • Suite404@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              No, hate speech is targeting someone for how they were born. (Skin color, sexual orientatio, gender identity, ect.) Reacting to someone saying stupid shit is not hate speech and dilutes the meaning of the word to use it that way.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m with you on the “they’re not Nazi thing”

      I think Lemmy is being a space for targeted radicalization for certain groups.

      But still I think you’re wrong that we can separate technology from this political stuff right now. It’s not separate. Technology is the medium that groups are using to spread this stuff. It’s important and interesting to see how they’re doing it.

      Content should focus on the tech side of it. And also why be angry at the side that’s just trying to protect their freedoms here. If it wasn’t for the people trying to limit their freedoms, we’d never hear of this stuff.

      The issue isn’t people trying to identify as another gender. It’s the people saying no they can’t and then abusing their power and influence to do it.

      • cotlovan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sure, you can’t always separate the technology from the politics, my issue was that this is what most posts around here are about. I took a look and most content comes a few accounts, and it’s always about the “nazi this” and “fascist that”. Is that really only thing that happens in the tech space, what Musk said and what YouTube changed in their policy?

      • Suite404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Seeing as you apparently need someone to look the word up for you.

        Fascism : a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition

        Let’s see.

        1. Christian nationalism is a huge part of Trumps support group
        2. Cops target brown people to attempt to deport them and Trump pardons them for ignoring court orders to stop (Joe Apaio)
        3. Trump continues to deport people based on skin and looks without due process. Ignoring courts telling him to stop.
        4. Trumps America first slogan is eerily similar to Hitlers slogan.
        5. Trump is starting to isolate the US from the rest of the world (but curiously not Russia)

        But I do agree, they’re not Nazis, they’re MAGA. Their own brand of fascism.

    • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hang on. I just scrolled down the comments list for a couple of minutes and didn’t see anyone calling anyone else a Nazi or a fascist. What are you going on about?

      And YouTube is a company. They don’t believe in anything except increasing shareholder value. It’s got nothing about far left or whatever. Gender identity isn’t even a far left idea, unless your Overton window is skewed.

      Also, you’ve just sort of outed yourself unnecessarily as an ignorant bigot in a left leaning community with your statement:

      Just because someone doesn’t want to play the gender tip toe dance, doesn’t mean they’re nazis

      Of course they’re not Nazis. No one’s calling them a Nazi. They’re calling that someone a bigot.

      Actually, it seems that people here are more concerned about companies not sticking to the far left ideology

      Actually, it’s people who are concerned about companies kowtowing to a fascist regime, the Trump government.