• Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      3000 years of dreaming would radically warp your sense of reality I think. Laying down all those repeating neuron paths century over century I doubt anything would be left of your recollection of the waking world

      Waking up would be like being born, nothing would make sense

      Aaaand now I have a new story idea

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The first crew would face the most difficult challenges. Imagine the relief after expecting to establish the fundamentals of civilization, and instead are just assigned your living quarters.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I guess. I’m more of a space socialist, myself. Silly me always assumed that equality and collaboration would be a precursor to colonization of other worlds. Musk is trying so hard to prove me wrong. Lol

          • confusedbytheBasics@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            If people stopped starving, beating,.and raping children for 2 generations it would be possible. Humans have no need to compete with each other for survival already. If we could just get a generation or two with minimal human inflicted trauma it would be obvious.

            Seems possible to me.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              If people stopped starving, beating,.and raping children for 2 generations it would be possible.

              How do you propose we achieve this? We’d have to isolate a group of people who’ve never experienced abuse and set them up somewhere the rest of us could never come in contact with them again.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          What if you set out with the idea of starting socialist utopia on a new planet and get there to find booming corporate dystopia?

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Except you’re basically a caveman. You leave and you’re one of the world’s foremost engineers, trusted to know everything necessary to build a new settlement from scratch, with no help from Earth.

      You get there and your engineering knowledge is 3000 years out of date. The only people who are interested in your skills are archaeologists and anthropologists. They use an app to ask you questions like “Could you demonstrate how you used woodpaper to wipe your anus?”

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        What a fascinating point. I’d be fine holding antique engineering story hour as my contribution. Who knows what old gems were lost over the years. It sounds like fun, even if I was just a novelty.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          If the records survived, they might not need anything from you, because they’ve already watched it all on video. But, maybe some of them would be interested to see it in person once. Even if we know how warriors fought 3000 years ago, it would still be interesting to see a true expert warrior using their weapons in a way that took a lifetime to master.

          If the records didn’t survive, you might be a valuable person to study for a while, but it might quickly get tiring to basically be a sideshow performer, there to delight the people who think of you as this ultra-primitive thing that’s nearly an animal.

          I would bet it would be pretty frustrating for most people after a while. You’d have this mental image of yourself as a sophisticated, modern person who was respected by his/her peers. Suddenly, you’d be living in a world where people around you might be struggling to contain their disgust. Things that are normal to you like eating meat or peeing in a toilet might be seen as animal-like behaviours.

          If you’re lucky, then your sophisticated construction and engineering techniques might be seen as impressive feats of craftsmanship. In a world where robots fasten everything that needs fastening, just driving in a nail or using a screwdriver might be seen as something really fancy, like we’d now see the kinds of stonemasonry that they might have had millennia ago.

          But, if your self-image is that of an advanced engineer, and the best you can hope for is to be seen as a quaint old-timey craftsman, that might not be very satisfying.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You’re absolutely correct from a “best practice” standpoint, but only the standards make it into records. That’s the source of our admiration of “old-fashioned know-how.”

            Real life experience can’t be catalogued. The index doesn’t have dirt under its nails. Sure, I’d be obsolete and out of place in the day-to-day, but I’d always be ready to coyboy up in a crisis.

            In the meantime, I could probably make a decent living creating one-of-a-kind newly handcrafted antiques for the neo-hipsters.

            I think I’d really enjoy our movie, btw.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Real life experience can’t be catalogued

              In ye olde days it couldn’t. But, what if the current database of YouTube videos survives? You’d get every non-expert trying everything in any way possible. If books and podcasts survive, you’d have every discussion on why things are done a certain way and not another way. Assuming it all survives, there’d be so much more information to future archaeologists and anthropologists than today. Right now we just dig up a shard of pottery and try to figure things out from whatever we can glean from that pottery.

              It would make for a cool movie. The only problem is trying to imagine a really distant future that makes the present look barbaric.

              They had fun with that in Demolition Man with the three shells. Star Trek TNG did it in The Neutral Zone where they had a bunch of people from the 20th century including a financier who couldn’t accept the lack of money in the future. But it’s really hard to make a future that’s believable and makes the present look barbaric.

                • merc@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The Bell Riots weren’t what they were cracked up to be. Either that, or they got the date wrong.

                  But, the writers in that scene went really easy on the set dressers and costumers: “Ok, it’s a street scene in 2024, but everyone is poor, and as a result they don’t have anything built after… say… 1995.”

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                That’s so true. I’ve thought about that quite a lot watching sci-fi. I really enjoy the idea of trying to create a completely new culture or civilization without first seeing it as an inevitable evolutionary progression. I think that’s the only way to really imagine a civilization that far into the future.

                I love that you thought of the three shells. It’s absolutely one of my favorite sci-fi mechanics to leave unexplained phenomena up to the viewer or reader. Most stories end up as a bland socialist paradise or a dystopian nightmare. I like the idea of something different altogether, or a blend of present-day and something else entirely. Kind of like how Taco Bell won the fast food wars. Lol

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    3 Body Problem has an interesting take on this. Faster than light travel is not possible but communication is, meaning we’re anxiously preparing for an alien war that won’t happen for 400 years but they can see everything we do in real time thanks to quantum entanglement.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Aren’t they the same but just dubbed in english? I picked the english one as I didn’t want to read subtitles

      • daellat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        From what I’ve heard the Chinese version is rather literal to the books to a fault.

        Having read the books I enjoyed the Netflix series, but understand they made some changes to both adapt it to a series (fine) and made a lot of characters westen (a bit unnecessary maybe).

        I am excited for season 2

      • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well the Chinese version on Prime doesn’t have any English subtitles so I guess it depends on if you can speak Mandarin

    • tane@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Good series, I always recommend the books but haven’t seen the show yet

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I haven’t read the books, but I did watch the show… I enjoyed the first half, but the second half had so much implausible bullshit that I couldn’t really recommend it. I mean, the first half also had crazy impossible tech - but I feel that’s ok because its part of the setup premise. The stuff I didn’t like in the second half was more implausible decision making and strategising (and also implausible uses for impossible tech).

        In any case, I really feel like they wasted a strong setup. I was disappointed at the end, and I’m not intending to watch the next session.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I managed to finish the first book, but it was so terrible that I wasn’t willing to read any more or watch the show.

        The whole book sets up a big mystery, then solves that mystery with the biggest deux ex machina bullshit ever committed to paper.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          macguffins are always just to drive the plot forward, their satisfaction as a solution is usually secondary.

          In simpler terms, they paint the cover of the comic book first and sometimes overbid for the purpose of sensationalism, so sometimes Superman has to pretend to punch Lois Lane

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s not a MacGuffin. A MacGuffin isn’t important to the story, it’s just there to serve as motivation for the characters. In the Three Body Problem, the mystery of what happened to science is central to the plot of the entire book.

            This isn’t “pretending to punch Lois Lane”. This is “why the hell did Superman just kill Lois Lane!?” The whole plot of the story is that science stops working. Scientists are killing themselves because of it. One of the characters is seeing a countdown when he closes his eyes. Aside from the Three-Body-Problem game parts, the whole rest of the book is structured as a mystery that they’re trying to solve. This mystery is the primary motivation for the characters in the book, and it’s presented as a mystery for the reader to speculate about.

            Basically, the book is structured as if it were a murder on a train, and the whole structure of the story suggests that someone on the train is the murderer. But, it turns out that the murderer is Zeus, who descended from the heavens, killed the murder victim for his own reasons, and left. Ta-da, mystery solved! (And there’s the additional bullshit that scientists are committing suicide because their experiments are failing. That’s just so ridiculous. Actual scientists would be so excited by unexpected results. The way to upset a scientist wouldn’t be to have something appear to break the laws of physics. What would upset real scientists would be a replication crisis: either they can’t match someone else’s work, or people call into question their work because nobody can match the results they’re getting.)

            And those are just the problems with the “A” plot. The “B” plot is the ultra-stupid simulation of life on a planet in a 3-body system. You know what life would be like in that kind of system: nonexistent. But no, you’re supposed to believe in people being flattened and rehydrated. I mean, come ON. And you’re also supposed to believe that people are playing this “game” and loving it. Has the author ever actually played a game? Has the author ever met any people?

            The writing is bad, the characters are bad, the science is bad. It’s just a bad book. It’s a book that dumb people read and they think the author is smart, and if the author is smart the book must be good, it just went above their heads. But, the author isn’t smart, the book isn’t smart, the book isn’t good.

    • spicystraw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Good show, fantastic books. Recommend to anyone reading this comment and are remotely interested in sci-fi. A lot of facinatong ideas explored throughout the series.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      FTL coms are a concession to the story, it would have been terrible without it

      IRL quantum entanglement can’t ever provide causality breaking info. In very simple terms, you need correlation to know when the data stream began as just observing the resulting spins still seem just as random before and after the event.

      In even more simple terms: Whatever message they can send even if pre-agreed on seems like random heat results until you know the exact moment the transmission began, as confirmed by a light lagged message.

      In less simple terms, the misunderstanding comes from treating the metaphor of ‘flipping the spin north switch’ as a literal thing instead of a less-than ideal ‘lies to children’ of what is actually happening to particles that experience spin transition, and the meaning of ‘entangled’ is both less and more strange than people understand.

      But again, 3 body problem would have been a terrible story without it,t hat’s why it’s science fiction

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, what’s the new civilization’s tech like? Bound to be more advancements than just travel speed. Do they have sufficiently fast FTL communication with Earth to keep up with the tech advancements?

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s another solution to the Fermi paradox. FTL travel is impossible, but can’t actually be proven to be impossible, so no one wants to be the sucker.

  • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    FTL isn’t possible, ERBs would pastafy any matter passing through them and there is no way to control the other end, and take Kardashev scale 3 civ at least (and that’s even pretending the Kardashev scale isn’t the purest daydream fantasy)

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounds awesome not only you skipped the hardest part you have everything setup and get to live a good life. Unless of course that was your goal to experience building the colony.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There’s an HFY story where the guy in the slow ship became a tourist attraction for the advanced humans that beat him to his destination.

    His bank account had grown to billions and they offered him billions more to keep it going.

      • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        guess you didnt play a lot of quests then. lot of them have good execution, namely the vanguard questline

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It was decent and has its moments, but it only works because starfield is a universe where phones with cameras and the internet don’t exist, and instant communication only exists when the plot remembers it’s not Fallout, which is not often. Secret military research? Believable. Said research getting out of hand and destroying a whole colony? Believable. Nobody giving a single flying fuck to said colony outside the questline? Weird. Not a single mention of repression and censorship about the event? Even weirder. Then again, after the terrormorph attacks New Atlantis, nobody gives a fuck (because cameras and phones don’t exist, nobody is asking about relatives or friends that are missing), not even the “TV Station”. After the damage is removed from the city, instant amnesia hits everyone.