• Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well that is just a tip of the iceberg.

    What do u think his digital currency was for?

    Corpos buy currency, he sells his coin, he does whatever corpos want, done.
    Corpos write off as failed investment, Trump gets paid.

    All digital currencies are for some shit like this - fraud.

  • SirMaple__@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    FYI if you live in Canada don’t use TurboTax, use Wealthsimple(a Canadian company) to file your taxes.

    • Robbity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if you’re in France, don’t use TurboTax, use the official government website that calculates everything for you reliably every year :o

      • SirMaple__@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nice! Wish our CRA would do that. Just review, approve, and submit all using their systems and no third party nonsense.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, the tool WealthSimple provides used to be called SimpleTax. It was made by a team in Vancouver and operated as donationware. You could file your taxes then choose however much you wanted to donate to them for the tool. They promised that they’d never sell your data, and never charge for the tool.

      But… then they sold out to WealthSimple, who of course removed that promise to never sell your data.

  • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always thought the best argument against him being bribed is that the cash he’s pocketing from staying at his own hotels is pretty petty as far as what the president could potentially get in the way of ill-gotten gains.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump is incredibly miserly for someone who’s so terrible with money. He straight-up refuses to pay anyone he thinks won’t win a lawsuit against him, stiffing dozens of contractors who worked on his real estate projects over the decades. He even ghosts the venues that host his rallies when it comes time for his campaign to repay them.

      There was an experiment where checks were mailed weekly to various random wealthy people with slightly less each week to see at what point they wouldn’t even bother cashing them in. Trump was one of only two people to keep cashing them even when they dropped to pennies per check.

      He’s also infamous for lying about his wealth. He is (or was before his presidency gave him endless opportunities to grift) a paper billionaire who in reality was so deep in debt and had such bad credit due to his constant bankruptcies that no bank in America would lend him money. That’s how he got involved with Deutsch Bank, the one with shady connections to the Russian government.

      He’s corrupt, incompetent, and willing to do anything for money. And he has so many grifts running that even if they aren’t making much individually, he’s still “earning” a fortune overall.

  • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Million dollar is practically nothing for this kind of company, they will net billions from this.

    Even their corruption is incompetent.

    • Forester@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not incompetent to give someone a penny and have them give you back $100. That’s a great investment. So I would have to say their corruption is very confident if they can give a million dollar bribe and get back a billion dollars of revenue.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Historically senators and representatives side with companies who’ve only given them thousands or tens of thousands of dollars in contributions. It’s very cheap to buy a vote.

      Though often there’s also the understanding that a career spent supporting them will be rewarded with a cushy, high-paying lobbying job once they leave politics. Or paid speaking gigs if you’re the President.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I honest to God can’t imagine how fucking cheap the price for them to make it so that people have to use their paid services… which will make them many, many times more than their bribe ever was.

    It would be like if you paid me 1 dollar and I did something that would make you 200 or 300 dollars…

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    wait you guys have to pay to file taxes???

    do they actually want you to evade taxes??

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pay to file and get charged if we don’t pay the amount that the IRS knows that we owe.

      They literally know how much we owe but make us pay a private company to calculate that number and then charge us if that private company didn’t help us get the right number.

      So the private company offers more “protection” and “tax experts” they charge us more for and make their “calculator” a little less helpful every year so you feel like you need the “tax expert” AI chat to help you avoid a charge.

      Capitalism is the most efficient system. CAPITALISM IS THE MOST EFFICIENT SYSTEM.

      It’s technically free to file federal and the tax prep companies must offer this by law. But there are tons of loopholes to this to the point that many people pay to file even when they don’t have to.

      State taxes are always charged if they need to be filed. It’s free in some states but not a lot and there is no requirement on most states for how much the tax prep software charges for that.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. You can file your taxes for free. And, if you ever pay to file your taxes, you’re not paying the government, you’re paying for tax preparation software or for a tax professional to do your taxes for you.

      But! Even if your tax situation is very simple, filing your taxes on your own is difficult. In Europe, the government sends you a form with what they think you owe based on all the information they have on you. If you agree with the calculation, you just send the form back and either pay or receive a refund.

      In the US your employer gives you some sheets of paper with some values on it. Your bank gives you some different forms. And so-on. When it’s tax time, you gather up all that paper, hope you have it all, try to remember what forms you need and if you have them, and then painstakingly try to copy the right values from the W-2, 1099-INT, and so on into the right boxes on form 1040, 1040 Schedule 1, 1040 Schedule 2, 1040 Schedule H, 1095-A, and so on. Then, you try to do the calculations where it says to multiply the value from 1040 row 43 by the correct value in table A9. A9 has different values depending on how many dependants you have, and if you’re filing jointly or alone.

      Basically, it’s doable on your own, especially if you have a fairly standard / simple tax situation. But, it’s easy to make a mistake along the way. If you ever need an explanation about what you’re supposed to do, that information exists, but it’s in accountanteze, and it often refers to about 5 other IRS publications that just complicate things further. And, when you’re dealing with thousands of dollars, a mistake could be really costly. So, most people buy a copy of TurboTax every year for $30, which somehow turns into $60 by the time you’re actually ready to file because the $30 version only covers people in situation X, and since you have Y you need to upgrade.

      TurboTax then takes $1 out of the $60 you paid them, and goes to Washington with that to lobby politicians to keep the tax code complicated so that people need to buy a new TurboTax every year. (Oh yeah, and things change just enough that every year you need to buy the latest software to file your taxes.)

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Australia prefills all the information from employers, banks, share market registers so most people can log onto the government website, go to their tax account and accept the prefilled form

      • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Europe, the government sends you a form with what they think you owe based on all the information they have on you. If you agree with the calculation, you just send the form back and either pay or receive a refund.

        That’s not true everywhere in Europe

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, and no. It is typically more convenient to pay to file taxes though. These companies hand hold you through the process and often have some protection for you if you get audited.

      That said, this still means the government needs to make things easier for everyone. You shouldn’t feel like you need help to just file a standard tax return if all you do is have a regular job, no investments, and no deductions. Which is something like half of the US.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No they just want us to do our part by both paying taxes to the government and paying corporations that pay the government. All makes sense in a tidy corporofascisit system.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I figured the Canadian system we have was as bad as the US’s but apparently not. Having to pay to file is wild

    • pablodaniel@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Real talk: why do we have to ‘file taxes’ at all in 2025?

      Don’t we have computers that should be automating taxes?

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because companies lobby Congress to prohibit major IRS restructuring and spending. If the IRS had auto filing and a bigger budget, it would make more money than ever before.

        The IRS could go after and audit rich people while the common person just gets a check in the mall from their returns. Maybe even no check, as the returns are only from miscalculations by the federal system, which is due to a bad system in place.

        We need a federal tax system in the US. No one likes paying taxes but we do. The IRS is the center of that for the Feds. And the Republicans gut it because it’s easy to say “I’ll lower your taxes” but not solve where the money comes from.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          returns are only from miscalculations by the federal system,

          Well, not really. More like incomplete calculations, erring on the side of overpayment because people are generally extra upset if they have to pay in at the end of the year, even if they technically made more money as a result. People are used to and kind of ignore the tax portion of the paycheck they never get, but they feel the taxation of actually making an active payment. So people get happy about the zero interest loan they give to the government because in the moment it feels like “free money”

          My employer has to do withholding without knowledge of other potential household income, credits, or deductions, though that last is pretty much given for everyone given how high the standard deduction is now.

    • scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, yes, because if they catch you evading taxes then they get a free slave for the term of your incarceration. To them it’s a win-win.

    • jaaake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The tax system is so complicated, most people can’t handle navigating it on their own. Most people have jobs where taxes are automatically removed from pay checks and sent to both state and federal tax agencies. However, that amount is just an estimate and once a year (or quarter) you need to file paperwork to confirm whether you over or underpaid and then you either get a rebate (without interest), or you’ll need to send in a payment to make up the difference. That paperwork has been lobbied to remain as complicated as possible so that companies like Intuit can provide services that tax payers find useful and continue to pay for. This is more complicated for business owners, both big and small.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, in my opinion this will be a good platform for American progressives to run on: make taxes less complicated by getting rid of middle men.

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            There needs to be more citizen lobbying. What really needs to happen is citizens organizing, pooling their money, and hiring lobbyists, just like big corporations do.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              A look at the Forbes Fortune500 should point out why that’s basically impossible.

              Just looking at the top one, Walmart, not even considering anyone else on this list, their raw profit in 2024 after all expenses and payrolls and everything was

              $15,511,000,000.00

              Amazon in the #2 spot made almost double that. Remember this isn’t revenue, this is profit, this is extra money after all normal expenses are paid.

              If I pulled together every single person I’ve ever met in my life, regardless of their opinion of me, and we all donated all the money we had ever made in our lives, we might approach a tenth of Walmart’s 2024 profits.

              The wealth inequality gap in America is large enough that it is actually difficult to wrap your head around. The difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars is about a billion dollars - to be exact, you’ll need 999 million more dollars to reach it after you have your first million in the bank. Fighting corporate money with citizens’ money is not only wasteful but impossible.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is nothing wrong with lobbying…. There are lobbies for woman’s rights, black rights, all sorts of good causes have lobbies.

            The politicians just bend over for corporate lobbies. Very important distinction. I think what would fit your argument better is will never happen as long as citizens United exists.

            • serenissi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Any paid lobbying is bribery. Legislators should raise people’s opinion who voted them in and act as representative, not say what others pay them to say.

              I can’t believe it is legal in so many countries. Apparently though it seems more problematic in the US but European countries aren’t immune either.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean someone has to pay the lobbiests. The National Organization for women pays lawyers to write laws for them to present to congress, through lobbiests who are also paid. You want feminist groups who are allowed to write feminist laws and present them to congress right? You want someone to advocate for laws you want right? That’s lobbying?

                Citizens united is what you guys are thinking of. The one where corporations can donate infinite money to politicians? So when a corporate lobby brings anti-feminist legislation, they then contribute lots of money to the politician they are lobbying. And magically the politican ignores their voters and sides with the anti-feminist pro corporate law. That’s citizens united. It’s not a problem with lobbying. You have a problem with corporate lobbys not womans rights lobbys right? You have a problem with your representatives favoring corporate lobbys because they get infinite money throught… DRUM ROLL… Citizens united.

                I really hope this helps.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                When we were legalizing cannabis in Maine the local growers had to form a lobby to fight against the out of state corporate growers who also had a powerful lobby. Banning lobbying doesn’t help it just takes away peoples voices. Lobbying is just a group of people pooling resources to enact common legislation or political goals. It’s an important part of the political process people neglect. and it’s been diluted by money. Don’t need to dilute it further with misinformation.

                • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  and it’s been diluted by money

                  That’s why they said “any paid lobbying is bribery”. While anyone can sign a petition to your representative and that’s technically also lobbying, what we’re talking about here is not that. In a democracy, every person gets their voice heard. With lobbying, only the dollar speaks.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait sorry what? Non-USian here, bear with me.

    What does “program” mean here? Why is this program necessary to file your taxes for free? Do you guys have PAY to file your taxes if you don’t use/apply/qualify for that program?? Am I misunderstanding what it means to “file” taxes? It’s been a while since I was this confused by a US thing.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      US tax code is (deliberately) complicated and unlike other countries, you need to manually fill out the forms with your financial data even though the government already knows it and what you owe. This is because there is a major industry around tax preparation, and the big names (such as Intuit) have aggressively lobbied for decades to keep the process as complicated and inconvenient as possible so that people are forced to pay them to fill out their tax forms. This lobbying has also resulted in the legally mandated free filing options being buried and hard to find, with many people not even knowing they exist.

      Tax prep is a huge scam with many billions of dollars behind it. Weather providers are probably going to be next in the news, since they’ve been trying to kill the free government-run forecasts and force people onto their paid platforms for just as long.

      • Free Tax USA is easy to use and free for federal, $15 for state. I used it last time. This time I filed for an extension because the IRS might be so gutted by October I won’t even have to pay. And I owe a lot because I was a contractor for most of 2024.

        Normally I have no problem paying taxes but this time it’s different.

      • pablodaniel@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why don’t Americans vote for politicians who want to get rid of the “tax preparation industry?”

        Why don’t more politicians mention it at all?

        Why has the working class been conditioned to squabble over bullshit while the ruling class robs them blind, again?

        I’m starting to think consumerism breeds stupidity.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The existing paid weather and mapping services are not excited. Right now they just repackage days that’s provided by the government for free, so while their customer base isn’t as big as it would be without NOAA, NWS, and USGS data available to anyone, their expenses are super low.

        They’d need 1000x at many customers to cover the expense of gathering their own data.

        Instead, what they’ll all end up doing is paying huge money to third party services (e.g.SpaceX), who have existing infrastructure that can be used to launch weather monitoring services and will end up being the only ones to benefit from this.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay so the “paying” is for when you use third parties to “help” you file, yes? You don’t pay the government for the privilege of being able to file, yes? So what does/did this Free File thing do?

        Taxes aren’t easy in Germany either, I’m glad I have a husband who is level-headed enough to do them for us both because I’d always have a near mental breakdown when I tried. But it’s always been obvious to me where and how to file without involving anyone I’d have to pay. Fuck.

        • lapping6596@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Free file is software that people use to file. As far as I’m aware, it’s always been free to print out the forms and mail it all in.

        • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          IRS Direct File was just a free government-run alternative to the tax filing programs like TurboTax.

          You can still do your taxes by hand without the help of any software for free, but they’ve killed the website that fills out the forms automatically and the manual process is significantly more complicated.

        • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personal filing is always free, the “free” in “free filing” refers to the prep part. It just means you fill out and submit your taxes yourself rather than paying a tax firm’s accountants to do it for you. Calling it that makes it seem like the firms are part of the process rather than bloated parasites feeding off taxpayers. I wouldn’t be surprised if the name was also a result of their influence.

          Their accountants can claim exemptions and rebates buried in the tax code that laymen wouldn’t know exist - ones that they lobbied for to make their services more attractive. It makes them worthwhile for some households, but only because they’re solving a problem they birthed and grew in the first place.

    • Email@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definition: A system of services, opportunities, or projects, usually designed to meet a social need.

      In this case, a digital service provided directly by the IRS, hence the name “Direct File.” In contrast, filing by paper is still supported. Tax preparation businesses have been actively preventing the US filing process from being simplified, naturally because that’s the reason they make money.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So this Direct File thing is simply for filing your taxes online? Because we have a thing like that too (doesn’t every “civilised” country?). And that’s what they want to abolish? US lobbyists are something else, man.

        • Email@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They want to be the middleman, so requirements for them to provide a free filing service are hidden and direct competition is in this case buried.

  • pablodaniel@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funniest part is how they’re bribing the government with the money they took from customers. Now they can take more money from customers, which is more money for bribes.

    It also means they didn’t need to charge customers the prices they charged, since they have enough money to operate their business and bribe politicians.

    It’s like, you’re paying them to work against you.

    So backwards, but that’s by design. Don’t be a useful idiot.

  • Kurious84@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone else starting to think since Trump likes Putin maybe he too would like to gather all of the nations wealth for himself and his leeches. Seems like they’ll get all the money and kick backs and business and we’re left with even less, causing us to work more and get less.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s entirely the point of all those tariffs. Raise taxes on everybody without calling it that.