• SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How are they going to get around the backup camera requirement? I guess it could be done through your phone but that sounds like it might be a support nightmare.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Europe and Japan had backup cameras with no touchscreen on cars 10-15 years ago. The radio head unit just switches from a small 4x6 inch LCD display to back up camera when in reverse.

    • this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The rear view mirror has been used in The past as a mini screen and I liked it. And if you unhook the camera in my Ford it would flash the little screen blue for a moment then realize nothing was hooked up and would turn off. Though you could just unhook the mirror connector and it would be just a mirror as well if you want to disassemble the interior to unplug it.

    • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It does say “no touchscreen”, not “no screen”. I’m betting it will have a small screen for the backup camera, with no touch elements.

  • lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sign me THE FUCK up, have been looking at 90s danger rangers to sate my small truck fix but so many of them have a car-looking front end.

  • etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find this minimalism strangely appealing. Unfortunately, I do not live on a farm. I hope this thing is useful to those who do, though.

    • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I pretty much do and I’m kinda stoked, cautiously

      If I can have a Linux truck that works and can tow something if need be… I’m dowm

    • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I live in a rural area and need to do truck stuff frequently (ex. We have no trash pickup and have to haul it ourselves to the dump). Something like this is very appealing to me. I could also see this being useful as a fleet vehicle that doesn’t really leave campus grounds (think facilities/grounds/maintenance).

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    no touchscreen

    Sounds like a dream. Or public transport. It doesn’t have touchscreen either.

  • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure, but it’s American, so it’ll somehow shit out a connecting rod around 150,000 miles and will cost $8000 to repair.

    • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do EVs have connecting rods? The article does go into right to repair, sounds like the company is pro DIY repair so that’s promising at least.

  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, please!

    We need a wider range of vehicle prices on the market. I bet a lot of people would go for barebones models for cheap if they had the option.

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no radio, no Bluetooth, and no speakers of any kind beyond for those required to play basic warning chimes.

    Many will consider this a cost-cutting step too far, but the interior was designed for ease of upgrading, with easy mounting space for anything from a simple soundbar to a full sound system.

    There’s an integrated phone mount right on the dashboard, but there’s nothing stopping you from bringing something even larger. I expect the low-cost Android tablet and 3D-printing communities to have a field day coming up with in-car media streaming solutions.

    • hansolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is 100% it.

      All I want is a modular car system. Everything modular. Dashboard. Body panels. Whatever. I want 3+ cars possible on one frame, and to not need anything more than basic tools to swap parts around.

      • demunted@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gm said they’d build a sled drivetrain that they could just plop bodies on top of but that never happened sadly.

        • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wonder why? Seems to me like a money printing machine for them, the factory and non- factory repair shops and the aftermarket.

          Unless it’s seen as a way to hide your car from illegal activities, which well now that I think about it is probably the reason they didn’t follow through with the idea.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably a balance between it would make it cheap for them to produce, but also bring down the barrier to entry for third party manufacturers to compete with them.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only that money wouldn’t be partially going into the pockets of Bezos, it would be amazing.

      And while easily replacable panels and such are a good thing. Having the mounting screws exposed like that is a horrendus idea. Because I suspect I know what much younger and very drunk people would do, based on the Mercedes hood ornaments I have in a box somewhere.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really see a downside to this, so why not line Bezos pockets if he is providing¡g a sane alternative?

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know, I like the design. If I can take a wrench to it and customise it or repair broken stuff easily and for cheap, even better.

      The range is kinda meh, but for working in remote sites, bringing a diesel generator is already par for the course, and that bed looks like it fits a lot of stuff.

      No stereo sucks though.

      • Bizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d build a mount for my DeWalt speaker that I’m already taking to my job sites who cares about a stereo

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I often drive long distances for work, and I NEVER listen to the radio. All my listening is through headphones off my phone. I even keep a spare pair charging at all times. Not only does it sound a million times better than any crappy car system, it’s far easier to take phone calls. I hate holding my phone while driving. It’s also easier to hear the map navigation lady.

        • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          All my listening [in my car] is through headphones off my phone.

          This is unsafe at best. Illegal at worst.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nonsense, how is it either?

            Too loud? I’m a musician, I value my hearing, so I don’t play anything too loud. I always use earbuds, so I can always hear emergency vehicles. Besides, I’ve heard plenty of car speaker systems that were loud enough to block out sirens easily.

            Illegal? In what way? In states that have banned holding phones, they encourage hands-free phone calls. If speaking on the phone is considered a distraction, then why isn’t speaking to another passenger, or listening to music? Both would be just as distracting as a hands free call. Modern cars all connect to a cell phone automatically, and take calls through the speaker system. If it’s illegal, then why are car companies allowed to install them as standard equipment? I don’t use that system only because I like the audio quality of my ear buds far more.

            By your logic, sound systems and phones in cars should just be totally illegal.

            • pahlimur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              In most states that don’t have specific laws about them its considered distracted driving. I wouldn’t wear them because it opens you up to legal scrutiny if you do fuck up while driving. Insurance will throw you under the bus the moment they can prove you had headphones on.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Headphones are considered like ear plugs. A tendency to block out surrounding noises like horns and sirens.

              • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I use earbuds, not headphones, but use the terms interchangeably. I don’t have any problems hearing emergency vehicles. If you are using them so loudly you can’t hear sirems, then you are going to go deaf soon anyway, and by your logic, deaf people shouldn’t be allowed to drive, right?

                And whether you can hear properly or not, it’s still not illegal.

                • jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Looks like it’s illegal in 17 states, some with various exemptions for using a single earbud either for anything or for select purposes only.

                  Depending on the earbud/phone design, even if off they can really reduce your ability to hear the world. Sure playing an open stereo too loud can have a similar effect, but it’s much easier to drown out things when your ear is stuffed or fully covered, without some sort of audio passthrough system.

              • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Only 6 states ban headphones in both ears.

                I’ve driven hundreds of thousands of miles, and never had anyone question it. I’m not stopping now.

                • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Its illegal to drive with headphones in most of Europe. You can use a one-ear headpiece to make calls, but not full blown headphones.

                  This, along a bunch of other rules that I’m sure you think are absolutely stupid, are probably why so many Americans die on road accidents when compared to the rest of the world.

        • CMonster@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your car just has a shitty sound system in it. That experience is in no way representative of most vehicles. I drive almost 200 miles a day.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I spent much of my career in the music business, with a significant portion in the audiophile audio business. ALL car stereo systems are a shitty compromise to real high quality audio.

            • CMonster@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I used to have a 2006 Dakota quad cab with a better sound system than most living rooms. There is a reason car audio is a giant market. I can’t even take you seriously.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What the fuck?! Why would you ever drive with headphones?

          Driving with headphones is illegal in most, if of not all of Europe, for what I though were rather obvious reasons…

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell yes, take my money. As long as it’s not a limit and manages to keep its range and I can get parts fuck yes