• suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I abandoned Google when they started throwing shopping links at the top of every search, even when searching for things that have no relevance to shopping, and they started artificially promoting scams and paid material above actual results.

    Google Search was best around 10-15 years ago when their only focus was providing the best results they could (remember when you could actually click the top result and you would be taken to the most applicable page instead of some unrelated ad or scam?). Now their focus is on providing the best product possible for their actual customers (paid advertisers) even when it means trashing their own product in the process.

    • sibachian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      they also ruined their own platform by creating and encouraging an entire business around gaming search results.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      15+ years ago you could search for an error code, or an error message, or a part number and actually find it.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ditched Google for DuckDuckGo in like 2019 and used that for a long time until Kagi came out and now I use that and I’m quite happy with it.

    • mesamunefire@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its been degrading as time has gone on. The other search engines (like all of them) are getting or surpassing google in certain subjects. AI has really made them look like fools in all of this. Their AI sucks for results and (while I dont like it) others are using chatgpt for search results.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would say it is just the opposite. Google used to be good before they tried to post-process results in this extreme way and AI is just an even more extreme way to do that. ChatGPT and all the other LLMs just increase the noise to signal ratio (noise coming first because there is so much more of it than signal these days).

        • mesamunefire@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I actually agree. Others use chatgpt for just about everything. I dont like it for many…many reasons.

          Google was much better pre-2020.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Google was best in the 2000s, but things were different back then. They were still a young company trying to improve the world, SEO spam wasn’t really a thing yet, there were far fewer websites, and most online discussions were archived and searchable (compared to today where there’s platforms like Discord that aren’t indexable in search engines at all).

          • applemao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            People use chat gpt to tell them what to buy. We are doomed. Our brains are about to shrink to the size of a pea in 10 years. All is going to plan for the elite.

            • mesamunefire@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Its funny because you can totally run good LLMs on local systems but people are just going to chat because its what they know and its easy to work with. Like I get it, but they are starting to put ads in the prompts now.

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          For a growing number of users, we can provide search results and ads from Google. For the eligible users, we will provide Google results by default. When your search results and ads are provided by Google, Google will use essential cookies and local storage to help defend against fraudulent traffic. Beyond this, the cookies Google uses will depend on where you are searching from: If you search from the EU, UK or certain US states (for example California), Google will not set additional cookies without your consent. If you search from elsewhere, Google may place additional cookies and the functionality of these cookies will depend on whether you have a Google account

          Seems like using Ecosia is about as private as using Google directly.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google’s been garbage for years now, I kind of miss Coppernic Pro which is what I used before Google it searched all the search engines available and combined and resorted all the results.

  • Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I switched when the answers I got started to become bullshit. I’d google a simple question just to double check if it was correct, but it gave me something completely different. Something so out of the realm of possibility that I was baffled.

    I check the sources for the answer and they were not even related. After that I started paying more attention to how messed up google had become, and I had enough.

    Google scholar however is still something I need… even though I dislike American corporations.

    • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s kind of unreal that they took something that worked perfectly well for 25 years and then fucked it up entirely overnight, for no good reason.

      Stick in bike spokes meme.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They did that to drive up short term ad revenue and it worked, and joy was in their greedy little hearts. They also did figure out that poisoning search results drives away users, and that search is kinda the fastest gateway drug to their entire ecosystem.

        But they’re stuck. Fixing search would lower their ad revenue, and stock holders would kill them for that.

        • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, the way SEO is gamed, it’s really hard to unenshittify the internet. It’s not just their ads, it’s everyone making fake bullshit that pulls the right levers to get to the top of a search.

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        and the nature of their 1000s of experiments going at the same time isn’t methodical at all. they don’t actually know what iteration of google search was the best and most useful one. there’s no going back to what worked because at no point did they ever know what worked. the modern shitty google search is the best version we will ever get to use again.

        google embedded them as a core piece of information infrastructure and then demolished themselves. now our information networks fundamentally do not work anymore

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not going to defend google, but it’s important to understand the nature of the beast. It’s not possible to simply revert back to an older version of search ranking because it is a constant cat-and-mouse game between google developers and malicious actors trying to game the system with their shitty websites.

      • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but this is a process that takes time; that said, he trend is downward and that will likely continue unless things improve.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And if tech people are no longer recommending it, or actively recommending against it, it is possible to get people to start switching. This is largely how chrome became so popular in the first place, and that required getting people to change from the default option.

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The recent duckduckgo ad campaign will surely help rescue googlers and so does my mission to ensure everyone I know doesn’t use google search.

          • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair point, but I refer you to my previous comment with the addendum that, unless things improve, Google results are increasingly likely to be removed from other services/features as time progresses.

  • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work in an education setting and in the last month, Google started preloading the contents of other sites directly on the search page. It is wreaking havoc when combined with our blocking tools because kids will do a Google search for something innocuous and the page will immediately get blocked because it tried to load a result from Reddit or coursehero or something else we have blocked.

    It’s incredibly frustrating.

    • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      the page will immediately get blocked because it tried to load a result from Reddit or coursehero or something

      Does that mean any search (AI insight notwithstanding) will get blocked if it includes a Reddit, Coursera or something on the blocklist result at all?

      Because if yes, that’s much more than just asinine. It’s basically blocking entire search topics due to the sheer fact that Reddit will appear on the furst page of Google a lot.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is exactly what is happening. They type in the search query on their Chromebook (for example, “why do dry erase markers float”, the results page flashes for a second and then the “this page is blocked” screen comes up saying they were blocked from Reddit, et al. Without them clicking on any search results.

        And 2 kids can do the exact same search at the same time and get blocked for different sites or only one will get blocked.

            • jaybone@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh I thought it was a typo. I have no idea what coursehero is.

              I will say coursera is awesome for their calculus classes. (Or they were like 10+ years ago anyway.) Which caught me up after a long hiatus from college when I returned to finish.

              • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                To be fair, I don’t know that we don’t block coursera as well but the block I specifically saw was for a course hero. And some of the blocks that we have on are for security reasons over reliability reasons. We have to be hyper cautious about the students leaking any potentially PHI and some of the Google sign in setups are less secure than others.

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thats because for some ungodly reason they use Apple Maps. Not sure why they dont integrat with an OpenStreetMaps like service. At least that way users can start contributing to fill the gaps

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s been my go to since they started. There is/was a challenge using them when we evaluated them a while back with forcing safe search reliability if I recall the reason.