• Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wonder if that person maybe has some kind of a problem that makes it difficult for them to concentrate and focus their attention when someone is talking to them or something and they just totally missed the detail about the medicine being prescribed. Maybe they need to see a doctor about it.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      HR is the office cop.

      NEVER talk to American cops.

      My HR and I have a wordless dirty look relationship.

        • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And HR won’t let you be a liability for a lawsuit either. HR is there to protect the company, not you. If they see that you could be a threat in terms of “work discrimination” they will get rid of you first for other reasons so you won’t have the chance

          • pack_of_racoons@sh.itjust.worksdeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then you can take them to court for wrongful termination.

            I’ve never worked for a company where HR was anything but useless. When you get fired for shit like this (or in general) it’s usually someone in the management chain calling the shots.

            • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              “I would like to file a wrongful termination suit”

              “We’ll need $50K for pre-trial, more if they won’t settle”

              “Oh shit I thought lawsuits were free???”

              “Common mistake, we get that all the time”

              • pack_of_racoons@sh.itjust.worksdeleted by creator
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I guess we just make shit up now? The NLRB doesn’t have fees for reporting violations, and Pro-Bono lawyers charge a percent of the settlement not "more if they won’t settle. "

                Yeah, it wouldn’t be worth the effort to go after for a minimum wage gig, but for a 150k career? Definitely. Don’t let “fear of HR” turn you into a door mat that tolerates a toxic work environment.

                • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That assumes you can find a contingency lawyer that will take your case, which is not guaranteed.

                  HR is usually very careful with terminations, with policy and practices being reviewed by lawyers so as to avoid giving you anything you can use against them. They’re expert in finding justifications to terminate people while making it look above-board.

                  So you go to HR and smugly try to get someone in trouble for bothering you. They simply will not care that you feel unjustly treated. If they terminate you, it will ostensibly be because your position was eliminated, or for cause (bad performance or other reasons.) But it will really be because the business sees you as more risky and difficult to extract value from than other people who aren’t crybabies. (That is what they will see you as, no matter what.)

                  And then you go to a contingency lawyer and tell your story, and they say, “sorry, we can’t do this on contingency because their case is too strong. They documented that they have valid reasons. But if you want, our retainer is $10K to get started, and we’ll try to meditate for you.” When mediation fails: “Another $40K for trial prep.” So at this point the lawyer is fucking you too, and you’re spending 5 figures on a case you stand a good chance of losing.

                  Or, you could just say “I’m not gonna talk about my pills, dude” to your coworker, and then go eat a pop tart in the break room, and stay out of that whole entire hurricane.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What the fuck is this thought process? Document everything as it happens, then EEOC their ass for the obvious discrimination. Do not let people discriminate against you.

    • Linearity@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have some patience

      I’m not disabled myself but if a coworker says something like that they’re probably just uninformed, it just shows that their concerned for you

  • flughoernchen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “You know, if you’re struggling with hearing comprehension that much, you should probably see a doctor and not talk bs.”

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Maybe you should mind your own fucking business.”

    I mean… at least they’re not trying to sell you supplements, essential oils, or other shit.

    Also why I never tell people I associate with about what I have or what I take. I leave it at “I have a condition” and then change the subject, like I’m a sad Victorian ophan trying to stay positive even as I am consumed by the knowledge that soon the plague will take me. (:

  • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This orange tube is full of NUNYA BIZNESS!! Good.day. Sir. Isaidgoodday. Arrgh, this triggered my anxiety so much. If I see one more person putting oregano oil up their noses to cure all their ills… x5 deep breath x5

  • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Have you tried [holistic bullshit]? It worked great for my [barely an acquaintance] who had [unrelated issues]!”

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s such a shame how the word “holistic” has been co-opted by the woo-woo brigade. The concept it’s meant to represent, which is simply “the idea that the whole is more than merely the sum of its parts,” makes sense on its own, and is applied in legit medicine.

      However, the word has been associated with snake oil so much that it’s hard to take it seriously anymore. I was in my mid-20s by the time I learned the actual meaning of the word; until then I assumed it was akin to “homeopathy” or some other garbage.

      • To riff on what you said, I think in the US 9/10 people think homeopathy refers to home remedies and traditional medicine. Because it seems like the word home is in there. I try to explain to people that homeopathy really is and their eyes glaze over like I’m telling them some conspiracy theory. I hate that shit so much.

    • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s more fun when it’s your own mother trying to sell her MLM holistic bullshit. No mom, I don’t need your snake oil pills, I needed a therapist.

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        My mom: you don’t need therapy; all a therapist will do is tell you everything is your mom’s fault

        (Spoiler: I did and they did and it was)

        • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Acceptance of the ways my mom failed me is a step towards detachment from her and healthy processing of my traumas. [That’ll be $15,000 USD. Worth it at twice the price]

          • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah. I started therapy for “anger management” (I got so frustrated at unmet needs that I bent a fork in half at a restaurant, which caused my still-boyfriend to urge me into therapy).

            Two months in, my mom visited and was flagrantly awful in ways I couldn’t emotionally repress. That helped my therapist zero in on the real issue and forced me to recognize it as well.

            My pocketbook is poorer but my non-relationship with my mom is much healthier. Oh! And I now am much better able to recognize my unmet needs and meet them before I bend a fork.

            • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Way to go with meeting your needs! I know how hard that is - my mom also trained me to put myself second, and treats me as an extension of herself. I recently (within the last year) realized that not only do I not reach out for help when I need it, but I don’t even recognize when I need help. It took my old manager seeing I was stressed and saying she wanted to help me, but that she’s “not a mind-reader” and I have to actually ask her for it, for me to step back and realize that my approach isn’t typical. It turns out I’m so accustomed to having to go through shit entirely by myself, that the thought that somebody else might be able to help doesn’t even occur to me.

              By coincidence, guess who dismissed me as a child anytime I went to her for help? Yep, dear ol’ Mommy, telling me shit like “you’re just too sensitive” and “the bullies won’t remember [that awful rumor they made up and are currently spreading against me] years from now.” Mmhmm, surefire solutions right there that definitely demonstrate concern and understanding of my issues.

              Why yes, I am still bitter, why do you ask?

              • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thanks and I’m glad you’re on a similar journey. Well, not glad you had to start the journey, but glad you’re progressing on it.

                I have grief for the mother I didn’t have, but it’s ok.

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    some people aren’t there for a conversation, but are just waiting for the right moment to say the thing they want to say to get the brain chemicals they reward themselves with once they say it.

    • verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      High five for you and everybody else here. It’s like one of the 12 Rules for Life, assume that the other person knows things that you don’t. Remembering that rule tames the racing thoughts and helps me to listen effectively for a few moments. It holds relationships together.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That makes sense. Sometimes common arguments, advice, and old ideas get shared ad nauseum around social circles, like moldy old memes that everyone, except them, is tired of hearing. One person says stupid idea with conviction, and others listen. Now when someone else repeats stupid idea around the first person, they know they’ll be agreed with - it’s an easy way to get that dopamine hit and strengthen a social bond. Others in the group then start to think that stupid idea is important for them to also believe, and the effect snowballs, as more of them share stupid idea with others - expecting to be agreed with.

      People keep doing this, over and again, never once examining the words they repeat. This leads to people who confidently say ignorant crap like, “You don’t need medicine, you seem fine to me!” despite the fact that they’ve only ever seen you after you’d taken your medicine. It’s likely someone in their social circle put that idea in their head once, and they never critically examined it because it’s easier and more rewarding to simply repeat things without thinking about them.

      • meyotch@slrpnk.netdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chiming in here.

        Guanfacine was a miracle for me. I couldn’t tolerate stimulants and while the initial fatigue was significant, my focus improved significantly and quickly. Not as suddenly or dramatically as a stimulant (which I was able to take after a couple of years of guanfacine, I was in bad shape at first).

        I still take a small dose as an adjunct along with a stimulant.

      • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think so. I tried atomoxetine first and it also didn’t help so far, at 25, 40, or 80mg. At least the guanfacine is not giving me any noticeable side effects. The atomoxetine caused me to exhibit more hyperactive symptoms (I’m Primary inattentive) for the first two days but then went away; I did feel cold in the afternoons and I also developed some mild erectile dysfunction ( went away when I stopped taking it). I think next stop will be a stimulant, not sure what I’ll start with. I’ll have to stop taking edibles because they’ll need me to take a drug test first before I get a stimulant rx

  • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get people’s intentions behind this, ignorant though it is. I think medicated ADHD folks get a little defensive about it too though. I took adderall and then vyvanse for about 15 years total. Now I don’t take anything for it; I meditate and do THC recreationally (which was how I discovered the ADHD in the first place.)

    I don’t think medication is bad, I think it helps people live they way they feel like they want or must. I realized that I was caught up in the hustle trap, taking meds to optimize my brain for the purpose of being a better capitalist worker.

    I actually really like my default state. I’m extremely flexible and creative, I get a mix of tasks done, and my emotions are well regulated. On Vyvanse I got a lot of work done, but i was also a rage zombie, and I was prone to falling into “productivity mode” where I could hammer out line after line of code that was all boilerplate or data entry, other easy work to focus on. The kind of thing my ADHD brain would force me to find an easier (better designed) way to do the task if I wasn’t medicated into docile compliance.

    So I’m not an advocate for either way: treat your mind the unique way you need to. But i really think the majority of ADHD folks are medicating themselves into acceptance of a broken and diseased system, when our brains have already been adapting to the actual needs of our information-overdense society.

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve started only taking my meds one day a week on the weekend. Partner and I both want a cleaner house but I am mess blind when not medicated.

        Work, work is varied enough to keep my attention. I don’t need my meds for work, just for home. One day a week seems to be enough to make progress towards a more functional home.

          • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, because I no longer have a prescriber. They decided to not refill my antidepressants without telling me, then I had to scramble to get a refill through my primary care doctor (or go cold turkey off of my meds, which is a Bad Plan with my specific antidepressant).

            So, what I have is what I have until I find a new brain doctor, which isn’t happening any time soon because ADHD.

            Also something something don’t share prescription medication.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have not. I went from XL (extended release) to the short acting ones but still wrecked me.

        I might speak to the doctor about getting changed to non-stimulant but the cruel irony is ADHD is going to prevent me doing this quickly.

      • demunted@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Straterra is ok but made me feel anxious. Wellbutrin xl is actually decent. I suggest at least trying both for those like me that didn’t like the rollercoaster of typical ADHD meds and the bedroom side effects.

    • time_fo_that@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been struggling with the same thing. I’ve tried Adderall XR and Concerta so far, with neither really actually helping with my focus or executive function. All I got were headaches, sinus pressure, uncomfortable appetite suppression (felt like my throat was full), and a few other standard stimulant side effects.

      Waiting on Vyvanse to see how the prodrug formulations work out, but I’m not optimistic. Concerta did help with my anxiety, but the side effects overpowered any benefit.

  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve had someone tell me with a straight face that I’m “basically taking meth”.

    This is the same kind of person that says “American cheese slices are one molecule away from being plastic!”

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meth is the #1 most abused drug by clinical scientists. That is to say, just like functional alcoholism is a thing, there’s functional meth heads among some of the most well-respected and reputable scientists in the world. Anyway that would be my response if I was told I was basically taking meth.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not really a good way to spin it. Having ADHD is nothing like functional alcoholism. An alcoholic is destructively addicted to alcohol, and a functional one is really good at hiding it.

        ADHD is a condition outside of any external influence, and medication helps normalize individuals dealing with it.

        Your approach is the logical equivalent of a burglar saying “I rob people’s homes because they have guns to defend themselves”.

        • alekwithak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What? No? I don’t think the scientists abusing meth all have ADHD or they’d have meds prescribed by their doctor. What I was saying was just a tongue in cheek response to someone telling you that you’re basically taking meth.

          I am really not following your analogy.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think the scientists abusing meth all have ADHD or they’d have meds prescribed by their doctor.

            Then that’s an even worse analogy than I thought you were saying. I get what you’re trying to say, but it comes across as “well that other guy did something wrong, so I can do it too”.

            And I know that’s not what you’re trying to say, but that’s how it reads.

    • stalfoss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do actually prescribe actual meth for adhd but it’s a different drug known as Desoxyn

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Desoxyn is a brand name of methamphetamine hydrochloride. Literally the quintessential ADHD med.

        It’s completely different than the street drug “meth”. The only similarity is the methyl-5 ingredient, which is a molecule that our body naturally synthesizes continuously.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s completely different than the street drug “meth”. The only similarity is the methyl-5 ingredient, which is a molecule that our body naturally synthesizes continuously.

          Slightly surprised it hasn’t spawned a factoid that claims the body makes meth/is full of it.

    • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like to pour them a glass of peroxide and tell them to drink it. It’s basically water. Literally just a molecule away from being water bro. Drink it bro, cmon! It’s just a molecule!

    • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, you technically sort of are taking meth in a way, but that’s because you need it since you react differently to it.

      I mean, there’s nothing wrong with someone with severe physical trauma being given fentanyl for example.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        dexamphetamine literally lacks the methyl group which gives “meth” it’s name.

        • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but it has the “amphetamine” part that gives meth it’s kick. And that’s what most people think of when it comes to the drug - the effect it has on a standard person, not the chemical name (otherwise they’d be calling methylprednisolone “meth” too. And let’s face it, the majority of the population doesn’t know why it’s nicknamed meth either).

          On a legal scale, “amphetamines” are what’s regulated, not methyl groups.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        you technically sort of are taking meth in a way

        You are 100% NOT taking meth when you take ADHD stims. The only thing linking the two is the core ingredient which is a methyl-5 molecule, which your body makes on its own.

        The drug meth is a synthetic methyl-5 compound with a ton of other nasty crap in it that doesn’t exist in ADHD medication.

        Like I said, whoever says that is in the same group as the American cheese is almost plastic crowd.

        • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dex_amphetamine_

          Meth_amphetamine_

          No, the thing linking the 2 is the amphetamine part. Which is the actual stimulant.

          The drug meth is actually just methamphetamine - there’s no “nasty crap” in it unless the person synthesizing it doesn’t refine and purify it well, which is true of basically all chemistry.

          A more apt comparison is a strong beer and wine - both technically different things, but both get you drink because of the alcohol ingredient in them. They’re both alcoholic drinks.

          Same with amphetamines - both are stimulants that have essentially the same effect. That’s specifically why they both work in treating ADHD. The only significant difference is one is legal (with a prescription) and the other isn’t, which of course means good luck getting it really pure and at the correct dosage. The only other difference is how fast acting / long lasting they are because of that tail molecule, but the part that has an actual effect on people is the amphetamine part.

      • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s nothing wrong with anyone taking fentanyl for any reason. There’s nothing wrong with anyone taking any drug for any reason. The only issues are things like how, where, when, etc. Anyone opposed to the full and complete legalization of all drugs should be executed.

        • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s nothing morally wrong, but there’s definitely something physically wrong with taking fentanyl when you don’t need fentanyl, especially long term. Like just because someone is addicted doesn’t mean they should stay addicted. I doubt you’re advocating for alcoholics to remain alcoholic for example.

          Also, I think you mean anyone against the usage of all drugs don’t have a valid opinion, not the creation of all drugs (there’s no good reason Krokodil should exist for example).

          • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This comment makes no sense. It’s like saying there’s something physically wrong with shoving bread up your ass. Who cares?

            • SparroHawc@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m pretty sure your ass would care, depending on the kind of bread. A firm crusty bread would probably do some damage. Kinda like how too much fentanyl does damage. Physically.

              • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                And yet it’s entirely irrelevant. It amazes me how stupid people get when you make even the most elementary observations about the world. Fear is your only god.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s nothing wrong with anyone taking fentanyl for any reason.

          Yes

          There’s nothing wrong with anyone taking any drug for any reason.

          Preach

          The only issues are things like how, where, when, etc.

          Absolutely

          Anyone opposed to the full and complete legalization of all drugs should be executed.

          Ohh. Oh no…

          • slappypantsgo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, I know, sometimes I troll too hard. But it is reasonable to take such folks and send them to an island somewhere so they can hate freedom to themselves.

    • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if meth was chemically identical to ADHD meds, the argument still wouldn’t hold. Anything that lessens people’s symptoms without creating even more problems can be a medication.