• Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    well I guess there are some places where the law does not always serve the rich, that is mildly good news

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I long for the day that ANYTHING close to this happens in the USA

      I guess you’ve good news, then.

      Across the Atlantic, two former VW engineers — Oliver Schmidt and James Robert Liang — are already serving prison sentences in the U.S. Schmidt, who once led VW’s environmental office in the U.S., was sentenced to seven years after initially denying guilt but later reaching a plea deal. Liang received 40 months after cooperating with prosecutors.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Neither were the people in Germany.

          The court sent the former head of diesel engine development behind bars for four years and six months, and the former head of powertrain electronics to two years and seven months. Two others — Volkswagen’s former development director and a former department head — received suspended sentences, according to Der Spiegel and Deutsche Welle reports from the Braunschweig courtroom.

          The (now ex-) CEO of VW, Winterkorn, is a fugitive from justice in US – the reason he isn’t in prison in the US is because he’s hiding in Germany, and Germany doesn’t extradite its nationals. IIRC from memory back during the incident, he’s facing a total of over two hundred years in potential sentence from the charges, though some of that would probably run in parallel, were he convicted, and I assume that in practice, there’d be some sort of plea deal.

          EDIT: Maybe it was over one hundred, not two hundred. I distinctly remember trying to figure out whether the sentences could run in parallel when reading an article about it at the time. In practice, he’d probably plea bargain it down, but there also is no parole for federal sentences in the US, so he wouldn’t be getting out early, either.

          EDIT2: Also, because he’s a fugitive and it’s a federal crime:

          https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3290

          18 U.S. Code § 3290 - Fugitives from justice

          No statute of limitations shall extend to any person fleeing from justice.

          So I expect that he’s probably going to stay in Germany for the rest of his life, unless he can find some other location that wouldn’t extradite him (Russia?)

          • ascense@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            According to Wikipedia, he should have a criminal trial in Germany starting this year, so it’s possible he will still get sentenced there as well.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the most unbelievable part: a us court held management responsible for criminal behavior? Did that not pay their fines? Did no one have a spare jet to offer?

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        To salvage the argument, it’s quite possible this would have been different if they were from GM rather than VW.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am surprised VW clowns got the prison tbh but i am sure there is a reason why it actually happened here.

          System fucked up lol

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It most likely would‘ve. Just look how quickly US courts started to turn Monsanto into shreds the very second Bayer bought it. They‘re after that so called stupid German money. Wouldn‘t work if it was American money.

      • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        two former VW engineers

        Yeah, unless they are Chief Engineers, these two are just people who got caught in the churn.

        Wake me up when the President of US Operations gets sentenced to prison. Hell, I’ll even be okay with club Fed.

      • FreeBooteR69@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        How about we don’t bring back corporal punishment. I get the sentiment, but i’d rather our justice system didn’t turn into a torture system.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I see your point, it’s important to note that the people jailed in the US were called “engineers”, not “executives”.

          • magnetosphere@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know if they’d have many, but I’d expect them to have at least a few. North America is a major market.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Their subsidiary companies do, but VW is a German company, the “executives” are ALL gonna be there dude… and those US execs would be doing what THEIR oversea “executives” want them to, so there’s still people above those who may be overseas. So calling them “executives” would be wrong since there is people above them still.

              The point is, your “note” doesn’t matter mate.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yes… the article is about the German company dude…… not the “Volkswagen group” and not “Volkswagen international” or whatever includes their multinational groups. To assume otherwise is just weird, they never mentioned anything but their German company.

                  Terms aren’t mutually exclusive… you don’t think those engineers held executive roles? They just weren’t executives of Volkswagen.

                  They would have had to say executives of Volkswagen (insert whatever specifics of the subsidiary), for it to be the correct term. Engineers is simpler and easier and is the proper way to express the situation.

                  Your “point” muddies the water and needs to bring on multiple additional pieces of information, which would also need to be described. Most people would know these engineers held executives roles, with some part farther down the “executive” chain.

                  You can be an engineer for Volkswagen, while also being the executive for Volkswagen US NW division, but it’s irrelevant to the article and requires more completely unnecessary information, so in the effort of good journalism and brevity….

              • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Every multinational corp has execs for each region.

                President and VP of insert region operation is a common title given to EXECS of foreign corps.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, what do you think subsidiary means…?

                  These engineers clearly held executive roles, they just weren’t with the Volkswagen (germany) so they would have had to clarify their subsidiary. For journalism this was the correct wording. If they wanted to call them execs, it would have had to go into detail about Volkswagen (Us particular division and reasons)

                  If you’re talking about Fritolays, you don’t just go and say execs when talking about “lays” or “Doritos” subsidiaries, you would use “engineers” or whatever other work they held to simplify it.

                  It’s an unnecessary distinction for non mutually exclusive exclusive terms, to use “executives” would lead to more confusion and that would be shit journalism….

                  It’s an article about the German Volkswagen, why are you assuming it’s about the multinational subsidiary? You can be an engineer for Volkswagen, and their subsidiary, but that requires explaining if you want to call them that. Which is totally unnecessary since the article wasn’t about them.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can be both. Schmidt was general manager of VW’s U.S. Environment and Engineering Office.

          As much as I like to see consequences, I would rather have just seen a very large fine put toward environmental purposes than prison time. Save prison for people who pose a direct danger to the public.

          • magnetosphere@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would agree, but with one significant condition:

            the fine would have to be large enough to be an effective punishment, and serve as a deterrent. A company as valuable as VW would have to pay an enormous fine.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              For funsies the justice department fined Meta fifty million dollars. Meta made that back by the time your eyes got to the end of this sentence.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I get what you’re saying, but we’re used to engineers and regular workers getting arrested here. We’ve got one of the most… comprehensive?.. prison systems in the world. It’s just so rare to find executives and anyone making over $300k suffer any real consequences.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seems like it also doesn’t happen in Germany, as the post title doesn’t match the article.

      The two people sent to jail are middle managers (Head of XY), not executives.

        • Libra00@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean my own counterargument to it as that no state should have the power to execute people, and if it should it shouldn’t use it on criminals, and if it should it shouldn’t use it on financial crimes. Yeah $12bil is a lot, and I am absolutely in favor of hard time as a punishment for financial crimes, but I don’t think seriously think anyone should die over it.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            no state should have the power to execute people

            I would present a counterargument to that, as all states in the world ultimately have this power, only the circumstances differ. I mean, grab a gun and try to shoot at armed police anywhere in the world. You will be killed, and nobody can sue the state or the police who shot you for unjustly executing you. Killing you is always fair to protect other people from being killed.

            From there, we are arguing whether states should be able to kill in cold blood, which is a different conversation, and my opinion is that we should keep making penalties for “financial crimes”, which usually kill more people than any mass shooter or serial killer could, harsher and harsher until there is a clearly visible deterrent effect.

            The case of the lady in Vietnam is not even a direct “cold blood” case by the way, as the state agreed to spare her if she puts at least most of the money back, which means that lives lost because of the absence of that money might be spared. In my view, this is analogous to shooting at an active shooter, and an okay thing to do. Lives are being saved by doing this.

        • Honytawk@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Death penalties should never be used since you can never be 100% sure of a crime. Otherwise you will get innocents executed.

          Even CEOs can be scapegoats.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It took 10 years? Well even longer because they figured something was wrong before it came public.

    The court sent the former head of diesel engine development behind bars for four years and six months, and the former head of powertrain electronics to two years and seven months.

    • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not so fast! The judgment isn’t final yet. Plus some trials are still pending. Also the CEO seems to be too sick for trial.

      To be fair. There are trials. It is not great but it could be worse. Imagine people could be deported and sent to prison for alleged crimes. Or so…

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    BMW and VW are the same beasts they were when they were backers of NSDAP in Germany.

    Between the VW emissions cheating and BMW’s subscription car features, it seems their attitude towards commerce has not changed a jot.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am sure some of their owners are of that same mind set but come on here… this is bread and butter white collar crime, Nazi Germany era war crimes. No need to conflate the two. Both can be true independently of each other.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The dieselgate scandal is why I am so disappointed when I heard that Volkswagen outsold Tesla in Europe for the number one spot since the start of the year. I have been hoping it would a more scrupulous company (and non-Chinese EV manufacturer) that took the number one spot for European EV cars sold.

      • raef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They only owned up after lying and obfuscating for years. California said they work with manufacturers when they are out of compliance, but brought their lawsuit because VW wouldn’t cooperate

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      being “scrupulous” is bad business tbh

      until the law and regulatory frameworks enable good business we will keep getting more of these parasites.

    • unskilled5117@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most people don’t know that it wasn’t just VW. Sadly I don‘t think you will find any moral acting car manufacturer out there.

      Automakers who have been caught using a defeat device within a diesel vehicle, in a similar manner to Volkswagen include: Jeep and Ram under FCA[391] (now a part of Stellantis), Opel[392] (when under GM), and Mercedes-Benz.[393]

      While not all using defeat devices, diesel vehicles built by a wide range of carmakers, including Volvo, Renault, Mercedes, Jeep, Hyundai, Citroen, BMW, Mazda, Fiat, Ford and Peugeot[48][49] had independent tests carried out by ADAC that proved that, under normal driving conditions, many diesel vehicles exceeded legal European emission limits for nitrogen oxide (NOx), some by more than 10 times, and one by 14 times.[49]

      Beyond exclusively diesel or passenger vehicles, automakers such as: Hino[414] (subsidiary of Toyota), Hyundai and Kia,[415] Nissan,[416] Mazda, Yamaha Motors, Suzuki,[417] Subaru,[418] and others have been proven to be falsifying fuel economy or emissions on non-diesel powered and/or commercial vehicles.

      Soure (Wikipedia)

      • xzot746@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Volkswagen was definitely had the loudest outrage but as you mention, anyone making a diesel was doing the same thing.

        And to your point about morals, yeah most corporations have no idea what morals are, and some might say that’s their right as a company to just focus on money, damn everyone and everything else, your health, the environment not if it interferes with my corporations profit margin.

        Social contract what’s that about.

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Canada we were told that putting execs in jail would “hurt jobs” and we had to pass a law that said they just get a fine instead.

    The execs in question were caught selling hookers to Qaddafi’s son.

      • hietsu@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dont know much about anything but it would not surprise me if it was some Bosch engineers who originaally hinted all those engineers of what could be done with their systems if they just listen some states of other car systems. Afterall, it’s their injection systems etc. almost every diesel manuf used/uses.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are genuinely the first other person I’ve ever seen online who seems aware that this was an industry-wide thing, not a VW thing.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You barely saw it in the news compared to VW as well. Even if an article would bring it up, it’d usually be headlines with VW in some way or another.

          It’s a shame so many of our choices for cars out there are run by bad people at the top 😞

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m used to executives being above the law. I had to read the article to be sure the title wasn’t clickbait.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is very puzzling, isn’t it? Why VW execs are put in jail and banking execs that created a global recession get off scot free?

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        oh that’s easy. the VW execs were under the jurisdiction of a country that gives a fuck and knows what the consecuences of unchecked greed are. the bankers were under the jurisdiction of a country that thinks maybe a little bit of fascism wouldn’t be so bad, all things considered

  • Vari@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s go Germany!! Shouldn’t be the election to the rule

  • Siresly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds like actual impactful consequences and accountability for the rich exploitative asshole executives actually responsible? Did I forget to wake up in the morning?