You must log in or # to comment.
And the oil. Everything in Dubai is funded by oil either directly because of subsidies or indirectly because it brings people to a region that is otherwise essentially an enormous empty desert.
Do you think people would go to las Vegas if there weren’t casinos there?
Do you think people would go to las Vegas if there weren’t casinos there?
This is an even more apt comparison because the Mafia started setting up those casinos out in the middle of the desert so they could do so in a place where they could control all the laws
Oil makes up 30% of UAE’s GDP and an even smaller percentage of Dubai’s
Yeah, I don’t think pearls or trade is making Dubai that rich anyhow any more. Especially after the Suez and like you said "cultured pearls.”
Neither is oil. The experience of losing pearl money and going poor for some years before oil was discovered is what motivated them to plan moving away from oil decades ago.
They are rich from trade though.
Are they trading slaves for money?
No, when people accuse the UAE of slavery they mean the oppressive and exploitive working conditions that abuse the class and wealth hierarchy, into a form akin to slavery. Not actual slavery where people are being sold outright, that is actually outlawed. In the same sense when people say prison labour, and undocumented migrant labour in some highly developed countries is a form of slave labour. It is not slavery in the traditional sense but still a grave abuse of human rights.
Some progress is being made on the matter, and there’s still a long way ahead. India-UAE Progress on Migration Agreements and Mobility Pacts. India’s Labour Agreements with the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: An Assessment.
Trade makes up 26% of it’s GDP. That’s the largest contributor.
Trade in what, that makes no sense… Oil and gas exports make up 85% of its economy
Once a city gets big enough it can be self sustaining from the people that live there and tourism even if manufacturing or resource extraction dies.
That or maybe the slavery.
deleted by creator
Yeah, the response agreed with them but seems to think it was a dunk.
Or maybe they’re an ancap and want slavery back.
Is slavery woke fellas?
if wokism is about equal rights, ending slavery was the start of wokism in America
Also all the oil money.
Mostly the oil money, I think.
I assure you they are not rich because of oil anymore than they are rich because of pearl.
Even if the oil is only 1% of GDP recently it was still 50% of GDP back when they were building all of their ports, airlines, banks, and hotels. They’ve also proven as recently as 2020 that they can flood the market with so much oil that it dips into negative cosr per barrel in other nations like the USA and Russia.
Kind of fucking weird to say slavery is the source of their success when they have so goddamn much oil money tbh.
Who do you think is working the refineries?
ding ding ding!
And cleaning the compounds, being nannies, groundskeeping, chauffeuring, tutoring…
Well paid professional native Arabs and foreign experts because it’s a notoriously dangerous and sabotage prone industry?
You’re talking about an industry where you can throw a water bottle into a chemical vat and kill everyone in the building or loosen a valve and set an oil rig on fire lmao.
Slaves under the kafala system are used in domestic duties, construction, and service (or “service”) jobs. Not jobs that require significant trust and knowledge.
You need well treated wage slaves that think they’re free for those.
Two sides of the same coin
I have yet to hear anything good about Dubai except from people who live there or are stupidly rich and live in a completely different reality than a normal person.
I have not done this myself but from what I’ve heard, it is cheaper for Indians to fly to Dubai, buy stuff like flagship smartphones, laptops, gaming consoles, cameras, watches, perfumes etc., and return to India.
Yeah, our customs/taxes are that exorbitant.
Shouldn’t the people who live there be an authority on the matter?
Dubai isn’t successful, it’s a rich fucks playground but no one wants to actually live in the shithole country.
A successful country is one where human rights are enjoyed by all, where people are happy, free, and safe. Where the needs are met, and people don’t die unnecessarily.
Sold. Adopt me. I’m a poor American refugee trying to escape belly flop-rocket cyberfrucked TACO golden shower up the doge until I tear-if
You probably wont like this. Most places who actually care about everyone (except those who want to change that) are socialists. Either authoritarian or libertarian socialists.
there are people who do want to live there (criminals wanted by their home countries with enough money to stay afloat, as long as uae decides to not extradite them)
What an amazing way to define success!! I will steal this and share it with the world!!
Fuck all rich assholes who define success as hoarding wealth!
For those rich fucks, being rich is success. They dgaf about the people.
A quote commonly attributed to Sheikh Rashid reflected his concern that Dubai’s oil, which was discovered in 1966 and which began production in 1969, would run out within a few generations.
“My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Land Rover, his son will drive a Land Rover, but his son will ride a camel”,[5][6][note 1]
He therefore worked to develop the economy of Dubai so that it could survive after the end of oil production, and was a driving force behind a number of major infrastructure projects to promote Dubai as a regional hub for trade
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashid_bin_Saeed_Al_Maktoum#Development_of_Dubai
They also don’t have sewage infrastructure.
Aka woke pipes
/s
Well that’s good. It’s always good to have sewage infrastructure.
The broke mind virus strikes again!
Oil. I wonder if this guy really believes his own bs.
At its core he’s likely a religious fundamentalist, so yeah he does believe his own bs.
You don’t know Dubai if you think he’s a religious fundamentalist
No, not oil.
Impressive diversification, funded by oil.
Different countries do different things with their oil revenue. It could have been worse.
Dubai without oil would just be no different from Afghanistan.
I was gonna say that Dubai is what you get if you give Afghanistan more money but that’s kinda the same sentiment
It is no secret that a large proportion of the wealth accumulated by Dubai merchants comes from smuggling gold bullion (mostly from Britain), Swiss watches and Japanese cloth into Pakistan and…
https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/1970/06/06/golden-dubai
Gold flown from London’s bullion houses like Johnson Matthey and Samuel Montagu to the The British Bank of the Middle East and the First national Bank in Dubai played a significant part in making Dubai what it is today. Shipped out by Arabs, Pakistanis and Indians in dhows to Bombay and other ports like Kutch and Calicut in western India, it brought much wealth to the merchants and the larger business community of expatriates who had made Dubai, home. The narrative of oil in the Persian Gulf has largely overshadowed that of gold and underplayed its significance in linking Dubai to the international economy.
https://mei.nus.edu.sg/think_in/gold-smuggling-between-dubai-and-bombay/
They also clean gold that is slave mined at gunpoint in Columbia for the cartels.
From Venezuela, as well.
I wish, that would be an improvement. Instead they are US and Israel vassals. Their economy though is not oil based. The UAE as a whole is only 30% dependent on oil for its GDP, the percentage is lower for Dubai.
In the past they were rich from pearl before Japan destroyed their pearl-based economy.
Yes it would. Dubai is a small coastal emirate. Afghanistan is a large landlocked country in one of the highest mountainous regions of the world.
Afghanistans largest ethnic groups are Iranian ethnicities (Persian) and the historical and cultural background are very different from the Emiratis who are Arabs.
What you said would be like saying “Italy without Pasta would just be like Denmark.”
Italy’s isn’t dependent on pasta though. Dubai is dependent on oil.
Don’t underestimate the
softal-dente-power Italian pasta projects across the globe.As for oil and Dubai: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Dubai
Oil production, which once accounted for 50% of Dubai’s gross domestic product, contributes less than 1% today.[4] In 2018, wholesale and retail trade represented 26% of the total GDP; transport and logistics, 12%; banking, insurance activities and capital markets, 10%; manufacturing, 9%; real estate, 7%; construction, 6%; tourism, 5%.
Oil and the pearl trade made Dubai rich, but they managed to escape this dependency.
Dubai isn’t dependent on oil. Oil makes up 30% of the UAE’s economy and an even lesser percentage of Dubai’s specifically.
well i imagine the average temperature would be slightly higher but i’m not even sure about that.
The temperature would be lower, because all that asphalt, glass and concrete create heat islands that traps heat and makes everything more miserable. It would smell nicer too, since Dubai has no sewers and garbage collection is awful, so the whole city smells like shit and putrefaction.
I think it would be less flashy than today but actually a minor success. It was already on the rise before oil.
And it’s perfectly positioned for flying between Africa, Europe and Asia. There’s a good reason so many major airlines are from the Gulf.But their airport and national airline were build with oil money. Could Dubai have become a major travel hub without oil, maybe. But surely not as quickly as they have done with oil.
If Japan never invented cultured pearls. That’s what got them rich before oil and gave them the experience that a major revenue source could be lost at any moment. The Emirate of Dubai lead the UAE and the rest of the GCC in moving away from oil.
Well he isn’t wrong, having slaves isn’t very woke
Pretty sure being anti-slavery is woke at this point
Woke doesn’t have a real definition outside of “anything fascists don’t like”, so of course anti-slavery would be termed woke.
Funny enough, it was the rightwing conspiracy theorists who used the term first. It’s one of the few terms that actually moved from the right to the left.
This isn’t even remotely true.
Remember “wake up sheeple”?
Yeah, that was only around 10 to 15 years ago. The usage of “woke” by left wing anti-racist anti-distlcrimation activists dates back over 50 years.
This is why right wind douche canoes who go onto talk shows and news panels are always coming up short when asked what “woke” actually means. Because without a couple of paragraphs of obfuscating bullshit to attempt to offset the actual meaning, their points of view come off like Nazi racist assholery. And if they actually just described the real definition they would find the audience agreeing with being “woke”.
I’ve long looked for a succinct definition of the pejorative sense of the word. Wikipedia delivers:
Insincere form of performative activism
…
Some leftists, such as writer Daniel Bernabé and philosopher Susan Neiman, criticize wokeness as a form of tribalism which divides the working class and distracts from the universalist class struggle
Though to be fair, tribalism is really hard to escape. Everyone seems to have a tribe.
I personally don’t identify with any of the large social movements taking place right now, on the right or the left. I do have a group of similar, like-minded friends. Now it seems like they’re my tribe.
I personally don’t identify with any of the large social movements taking place right now, on the right or the left. I do have a group of similar, like-minded friends. Now it seems like they’re my tribe.
This sounds like it makes you feel very safe. The fascists will likely come for you last.
Ya, its some wokeism to not love slavery. Massively woke. So woke, you’ll be tired of wokeing.
Tomato; Tomato
Behold; the epitome of success!
(Worker/builders)Dripping with success. The people who risk their lives building skyscrapers even get their own bed (sometimes)
That first photo is a very famous one of the Paraisópolis favela and the Morumbi district in São Paulo. (Source)
The second photo is of the Naya Nagar neighbourhood in Mumbai’s Dharavi area. (Source)
The third one is, however, actually what you purport it to be. (Source)I imagine you’re not trying to deceive people and I agree with the points you’re trying to make but please make sure that you check your sources before spreading info
Fuck, now i feel bad. Really Cant trust the internet these days.
I changed it up and included the one picture i could find that appears authentic but because that picture of mumbai was actually labeled dubai i really dont know anymore.
Thanks for pointing it out.
I also found this one but its the same source as the mislabelled mumbai picture so i cant trust it.
Look on the right side. Graffiti says “Carlos Perez” and the flag has the word “presidente” in it. Neither Dubai nor Mumbai since nobody there would write graffiti in Latin alphabet or in Spanish for that matter.
The fuck.
Basically this entire article is a lie, the author framed it as pictures from their own trip even.
Wait a minute, someone lied on the internet?!?
The third pic in this article is just AI slop
