• Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it. I’ve had access to a ps5 devkit and UE5 in the past.

      What I don’t believe is that they can actually run a full-fledged game on the same hardware at the same level of fidelity

      • slimerancher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting thing is, they never claimed they can 😀

        I am not even sure how far along they are with the game, so maybe they aren’t in a position to talk about performance and visual fidelity, but this is going to make people think this is how Witcher 4 will look and run.

        • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one has been doing that kind of claims directly since… TW3 actually ? Or maybe Watch Dogs. Epic Games and CDPR know that every content creator under the sun will run with that and make these claims for them to start the hype machine.

          • slimerancher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah… I was going to say this can blow up on their face if the game isn’t that good, but even when it happened with Cyberpunk 2077, they still made tons of money, and everyone seems to have forgotten that it ever happened, so maybe it won’t really matter to them.

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What does it matter what it was running on? This looks pre rendered and anything pre rendered will look good even on a potato. Case in point Blizzard’s old pre renders in warcraft and diablo.

    Don’t get me wrong, i’m excited for new witcher, just be realistic on the requirements. I’d rather not have another cyberpunk ps4 fiasco.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well damn I know it’s just footage of a tech demo so there is a lot that can happen still and Ciri was definitely not controlled live (as they tried to make us believe if you watched the full event. Like seriously, who’s going to believe you when you slice up a horse and voxelize trees? Holding the controller on stage was just corny, sorry guys) BUT it looks amazing! I especially loved how they showcased some of the technical details. I really didn’t think it would impress me this much because they showed way more about a game that’s probably years away from release than I ever anticipated. And again, a lot can still happen and go wrong but I would lie if I said I wasn’t hyped already. Mission accomplished I guess.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not unbelievable. If the trees voxelization thing is just a visualisation mode in the engine, it’s stupidly easy to “ship” it into a dev build and activate it with a shortcut. Hell the nanite visualisation thing they showed on foliage before that one is exactly that, and iirc enabled by default in dev, you just need to toggle a cvar to see it.

      Source : have worked on UE5 games

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surely digital foundry will find improvements but to me this doesn’t look that different than witcher 3. Better animations and hair looks better I think? Never noticed lod transitions myself. The promise of increaaed interactivity means nothing in a trailer neither. I only hope it has better multi core performance especially with ray tracing

    • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you gone and looked at what W3 looks like recently? It’s not a bad looking game by any stretch but this still looks significantly better imo. The vegetation density definitely looks way better, as well as the lighting.

      • JiveTurkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been replaying W3 and I agree. This looks quite a bit better in terms of foliage density and character detail. W3 still looks great though.

  • Ashtear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ugh, I can already tell this is my deadline for my getting a GPU upgrade.

    Hopefully the switch to a third-party engine means I won’t have to wait a year after release like I did with CP2077. I imagine this game has to be super important to Epic.

  • Astigma@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    While this is definitely real-time and in-engine, it’s so heavily scripted and such a small vertical slice of the game that it can’t be used as a representation of the final game at all. CDPR have learned nothing from Cyberpunk and Witcher 3 launches, it seems.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve come out and said specifically this is a tech demo in the world of the Witcher 4 but its not actually witcher 4 the game. As in, they’re showing off the new tech, like foliage nanite.