• FerretyFever0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I blame the French for 120 days of Sodom burning my eyeballs, and I just skimmed the Wikipedia article. One of them chose to print that instead of burning the notes. Anyways, why is the hub being blocked in France?

      • merdaverse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Children should be reading good old stories like 120 days of Sodom, not this Pornhub filth” - probably some French conservative somewhere.

        • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Marquis de Sade was an elected official btw. He would’ve jacked off to shock sites. Says quite a bit about some of the French that it wasn’t burned. It should’ve been. No historical or entertainment value, just pure degeneracy.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        French politicians passed a law that requires porn sites collect pii (identity) in order to access the site. PornHub won’t violate the privacy and security of their users, so they simply block the locales that pass such laws.

      • tarknassus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Protest on them trying to enact age consent laws.

        By showing the message rather than Pornhub’s vast library of adult content, Aylo “is communicating directly with the French people to tell them how dangerous, how potentially privacy-infringing, and how ineffective the French law is”, Solomon Friedman of Aylo’s owner, Ethical Capital Partners, told reporters in a video call on Tuesday.

        Paris has this year gradually introduced requirements for all adult websites to have users confirm their age with details like a credit card or ID document.

        In a bid to preserve privacy, operators must offer a third-party “double-blind” option that would keep the platforms themselves from seeing users’ identifying information.

        Edit - the sauce - Pornhub, YouPorn owner suspends access to French users over age verification law

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like reddit and YouTube are completely different leagues when it comes to porn… Porn is the only reason I haven’t deleted my last reddit account. YT doesn’t even really have real porn…

        • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          YT doesn’t even really have real porn

          Indeed, but there’s still things to find if you’re a young scared kiddo, and I’d say it’s pretty soft so it’s okay

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Reminds me of when my buddies discovered our friend’s YouTube account… He only had one public playlist, and it was 100% full of softcore porn. Nothing else. It was all softcore porn. We gave him a pretty good ribbing for that one, and still make a point of reminding him that better porn sites exist every time it comes up.

        • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Always hide your playlists and subscriptions haha

          But softcore has the benefit to help you retain normal libido and to not be dependent of more hardcore stuff

    • Schmoo@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      VPN companies and data brokers have a financial incentive to lobby for intrusive age-verification and restrictions, and prudish politicians are conveniently present in every political system. The porn lobby is powerful, but it seems they’ve been losing this battle recently. Or maybe they’re cutting deals with the data brokers, who knows.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Politically speaking, it’s easy money. You pander to the conservatives with blocking propositions, get votes.

      *Who is going to champion the flip side?!"

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Me. Porn is fine. Teach your children how to handle it. Teach them that it’s not realistic and some of it is straight-up dangerous. Put a filter on your internet if you’re too scared to talk to your kids about uncomfortable topics.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Political theater. “Won’t somebody think of the children?” is an easy win for politicians.

  • skinnydugan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dr. Cox was right: “I’m fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there’d only be one website left, and it’d be called ‘Bring Back the Porn.'”

  • passepartout@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m shocked that this many people feel the need to disobey a rule that is only there to help the children. Next step must be to ban VPNs altogether, and enforcing all Internet users to be identified with their real identity (/s obviously).

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The VPNs will be harder to ban. Not just from a technical standpoint, but politically as well. Big businesses will be absolutely opposed to VPN bans.

      • passepartout@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There will be a lot of businesses who feel the (justified) need to hide the entrypoint to their infrastructure behind a VPN.

      • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel they could easily ban VPN companies (maybe?), which is what 99.9% of people that want to browse from a different location use.

        This won’t affect companies at all as they would be using their own VPN.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The only way the sovereign nation of France can ban VPN companies not based in France is to block the IP address of every single entry point of every single VPN company and keep doing so as they add new entry points (I bet the response on the VPN company side would be to start having some kind of dynamic VPN server thing).

          And then, as somebody else already pointed out, any technically inclined person can just rent a VPS anywhere in the World and fire up their own VPN server on it.

    • unautrenom@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fun fact: they already tried. In the same law where they tried to ban E2EE a few months ago. It went about as well as you’d expect.

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      if the VPN ban doesn’t work then the only reasonable course of action would be to ban the internet entirely. it’s the only way the children can be truly safe.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty satisfied as a subscriber. Slowly using proton mail for more and more important accounts. Constant usage of the VPN. Trying to use the calendar more but still haven’t broken my Google Calendar habits. Proton Drive I use over google; I just need a Linux desktop application. Proton pass, still haven’t given that a go. Comfortable with KeepassXC and managing the backups myself. Proton Docs, it’s OK. Solid start. Hoping that notes partnership/acquisition eventually replaces Google Keep for me as a cloud notes application. I have pretty strong confidence now in the company regardless of the slow Linux developments

  • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean for context with the TikTok comparison using a VPN didn’t get you around the TikTok ban unless you also made an entirely new account.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone with more than two brain cells to click together could have told them this would happen. Some of them did. Not that they would/did listen.

    • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes, chat control, the crackdown on encryption, backdoors, etc., all forgotten? So now thousands of French people are deliberately using VPNs for something that is now illegal. Well, the politicians won’t take advantage of this to take action against VPNs and encryption… To protect the children, of course…

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t people realize there are hundreds of free porn video sites besides Pornhub? With bigger selection too because the lesser known sites usually don’t get half their content DMCAed.

    Paying money for a VPN just to access ONE site? Sigh. I really hate web 3.0

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate how VPN access is the scaffolding holding the building up making things look normal. You can visit all your normal web sites, you can bypass georestrictions, you can be a little less tracked than you might otherwise be. But what happens when they decide to do away with that scaffolding and we all find out they tore down the house behind it while we were enjoying “normalcy”. Too much of making the web functional depends on vpns and adblocking. We shouldn’t have to do this stuff and Chromes adblocking scandle should impact millions of users all around the world unilaterally removing adblocking from the web. I fear for the day we have a US only internet and a global internet, not just on paper, but in actual practice.

  • Spaniard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And now they want to keep doing the job of the parents and forbid “social network” to kids 15 and under.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess this bodes well for Proton becoming increasingly a Google One products replacement with more users potentially paying