• Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I went from supporting gun control to not supporting it anymore. Cops should absolutely fear armed protesters in all countries.

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Afghanistan was even worse. People often think the Vietnamese were just the Vietcong but often forget that North Vietnam had an army and an air force. The North Vietnamese airforce had far more fighter aces than the US (with the top ace having shot down 9 US aircraft).

          Afghanistan with the Taliban had next to nothing. Even when the US tightly controlled ammonium nitrate, which was the mainstay of IEDs they were able to switch to other stuff.

          This is in addition to tons upon tons of explosives salvaged from UXOs dating as far back as the Soviet-Afghan war.

          A true rebellion in the US would be actually be far deadlier. Americans are much richer than Afghanis ever were and have a fuckload more at their disposal. This is also not discounting that foreign elements who want to see the Trump regime toppled would be more than happy to send in tons of material to whatever opposing side exists, meaning they may not need to rely on shitty IED for long and would have proper factory made explosives and other weapons available.

        • supamanc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a bit disengenuous though. Vietnam was a war on foreign soil. The vietcong did not have to win, they just had to male it politically and financially untenable for the US to carry on. Same with Afghanistan. It will never be politically or financially untenable for the fascists to keep suppressing the citizens.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        1 sniper can kill many, many enemy officers. This is a historical precedent.

        You don’t need heavy artillery to wage guerilla warfare and cripple an enemy’s operational capabilities.

        A bunch of farmers in Vietnam outlasted us using those tactics.

        • Liberal_Ghost@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not wrong. But with today’s tech its more unlikely that one sniper is going to be as effective. With drones equipped with IR it’s a lot harder to stay hidden. And in a more urban environment, there are cameras everywhere, and the police have access to everyone’s ring doorbell camera, its getting a lot easier for them to track people down.

      • coldasblues@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im so sick of this argument. Tell me again how we were defeated in Afghanistan? The US military has a horrible track record when fighting against insurgents and guerrillas.

        • Zenith@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The US is Rome and we are Hannibal’s Army, as long as we don’t choke and refuse to sac Rome we absolutely have the an advantage in a lot of ways

      • HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tanks can burn

        Jets struggle against individual personnel

        I don’t really give a damn about nukes because it sounds like a fast death

        You cannot occupy an area without exposed boots on the ground and those footsoldiers are absolutely susceptible to small arms

        Stop giving up because it sounds hard

        • supamanc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you fight the NSA though? Whne they tag you as a dissident, and the government freezes your assets and accounts. You are denied medical treatment and employment. Added to no fly lists, no travel lists etc etc. This is how the fascists maintain control, using the ‘security’ apparatus. This is what you have to contend with.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup.

      Been for strict gun control all my life. And, in a decent country, I still would be.

      But this isn’t a decent country. It’s a country full of low-IQ fools and fascists and racists, so it’s time to get armed and prepare for the worst, which appears to be where we’re headed.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think maybe he things that makes him sound tough, instead of like a problem in desperate need of solving that could have been ignored had it not been so persistent.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I see is a tiny, insecure so-called man talking tough and playing with guns to convince the world he’s not a scared child inside.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The whole thing hangs off the rule of law. There aren’t enough cops to control the population, it only works because the population controls itself because they accept the rule of law. If the cops go rogue or the politicians, eventually the belief in the rule falters then chaos.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re talking rule of law vs rule by law.

      I don’t get what they think the endgame is going to be here. Because it’s not going to work out well for them either.

  • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not nice of him to say it like that, but that’s pretty much what everyone knows cops are doing. I don’t think anyone ecpects a different outcome.

    One could argue a peaceful protest is different from a riot and cops shouldn’t kill peaceful protesters, but there’s always a chance they will.

    If someone wants zero risk, they can only do short operations that don’t need much media coverage to be effective and without a chance for the cops to be present or find them afterwards.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        the point is to inspire people who don’t want to risk their health or want to be more effective to find more effective ways to cause change.

        the decision to make it was, that i don’t like to watch ppl get hurt and know there are more effective ways, which spoil if one mentions them too publicly. So ppl have to come up with them privately, so the cops can’t expect and hurt them.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All of those situations can be avoided by them not ordering their officers to show up and harass the protesters. If the cops actually stayed out of the way and allowed them to peacefully protest, there is never a point where anyone should get spit on, hit, or threatened. Then again, if police weren’t treating everyone as criminals all the time, it would severely reduce the number of officers they would need.

      Partly because of respect, and partly because when you aren’t harassing the population, they don’t have as many reasons to react.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        that’s true, but past violent protests with looting and causing damage led to broad calls of regular citizens for police to be there just in case. then, there are those among police who enjoy hurting others and will try to escalate any peaceful protest to a fight.

        the only way to end this spiral, would be for protesters to instantly take down rioters among themselves, disperse and go home, so it would become a rare exception for riots to start and police would no longer show up after a few years. but is this realistic? even if some groups manage to do that, others won’t. also police could always send instigators who throw the first brick, then leave, so their colleagues have a reason to kill some protesters

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You guys lack strategy.
    Do it like a Bundy ranch - get armed. They won’t touch you if you are bunch of armed people

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do it like a Bundy ranch

      What was notable about Bundy Ranch is how gentle the police were even after they’d been shot at.

      This wasn’t an issue of firepower, it was an issue of white nationalism. Police sympathized with the ranchers in a way they simply do not with anyone young, particularly of color.

      Compare that to the FBI raiding the Waco compound or the US Marshalls going after Ruby Ridge. Police have no trouble showing up at your door with a tank. The only thing that protects you is ethnicity.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Real “occupying military presence” vibe off the guys who are supposed to Serve and Protect.

    Beginning to wonder if cops aren’t here to be my friend.

  • Philzlaus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one in this forum who calls for violence against other people and sometimes for the killing of cops is even a bit better than this brain-dead sheriff. American society is so deeply divided.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Opposing a militant regime seeking to do harm to you and yours is not the same as enacting systemic violence to oppress marginalized people.

      If cops and the state are gonna call to kill protestors then protestors and the people being targeted can call to arm themselves to defend against it.

      Yes, America is divided. For good reason.

    • Ithorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed, no hope for America and Americans. This is a civil war that can take decades to heal

  • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weirdest shit was the time I was drunk with a cop buddy. With his cop friends. Who were also getting loose lips and telling stories and one of them checked them all and said. I wasn’t a cop. And not to talk about that stuff around me. Still bothers me. I never saw that friend again. But ya. Wild stuff.