• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ehhhh no.

    I can get behind “ban spying on me.”

    I can even get behind “ban social media, especially the kind that makes you sell yourself, though pseudononymous link aggregators are less the issue.”

    But “no more torrenting at work, no more reading digitally while pooping, no more encrypted chats, now have to carry a book, a camera, an mp3 player, my GBC, and a dumb phone, just to make up for the phone?”

    No.

  • Lembot_0003@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Smartphones make us more social, allowing us to reach each other ad hoc, not just by planning the meeting for a week. They makes us more free by providing helping tools like GPS and similar. They make us happier by helping to kill time while standing in the line or riding on the bus.

    You’re doing something wrong.

      • Lembot_0003@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And what does it have to do with smartphones? You think that “social media” is “antisocial”? Well, then write it as “ban social media”. Be precise with formulations.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And what does it have to do with smartphones?

          You said they make us “more social”. I said they don’t.

          You think that “social media” is “antisocial”? Well, then write it as “ban social media”

          Also acceptable.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    smartphones are one of rhe hundreds o things that would probably be just fine and good if it weren’t for capitalism

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk why don’t you go directly to the site?

      https://jacobin.com/

      Looks fine to me but they’re preaching to the choir. You’re certainly right that people have only been posting their shit takes here.

      Like some kind of engagement or rage bait or something

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No it isn’t. Technology is the evolutionary adaptation of humanity. It would be like a tiger cutting off its claws, or a rabbit breaking its own legs.

        This left wing Luddite attitude is simply fueled by fucking tribalism because it wasn’t really anywhere to be found until the tech bros turned republican.

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Smartphones convicted the murderer of George Floyd. Smartphones have shown to the world the police brutality that happens at peaceful protests. Technology isn’t inherently evil, it’s how its used.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Smart phones are just pocket computers. Up to you how their used, good evil neutral it’s all at ur fingertips.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And then what? Go back to the stone age?

    Kids waiting to get picked at school and their parents have emergency, how are they gonna inform the others to get picked up? Are they gonna just let that kid suck it up and wait for hours, just like the good old times?

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? Corded phones exist, and most schools and offices have at least one in each room. Dumb phones exist. Pagers exist.

      Smart phones are not the only singular solution for easy, quick contact.

  • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about no. I’ve been wanting a pocketable “do everything” device since I got a Tiger Electronics Pokedex as a kid.

    How about better regulations on the obscene amount of data collection going on behind our backs? I can’t count how many times I’ve come across even just websites that have a giant “accept all cookies” button, but in order to reject any, you have to dig through layers and layers of “settings”. The most I’ve seen was 80+. And that’s just websites.

    I’m about to wipe my phone and go all-in on Calyx OS.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Me who has a disability which prevents me from speaking and hearing people and renders me bedridden.

    “Okay, guess I’ll die then”

  • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey David, can you guess how many people are reading your article from a smartphone? Convenient, isn’t it.

    Want to complain about smartphones? Write a book… or something that can be published on fucking paper.

      • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, can you guess which percentage of people prefer using an smartphone to read these kind of anti smartphone articles? Do you see the issue? The irony?

        This is just trash ragebait dude.

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem is with planned obsolescence and capitalist drive to always make more. The device itself is not inherently bad, it’s a glorified calculator.

  • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Author admits smartphones are ubiquitous, and doesn’t at all consider, in a hypothetical situation where everyone unanimously agreed to stop using them, where all this e-waste will go?

    Also, how do you disillusion the millions of people that use them religiously?

    I get the sentiment, but only a significant technologically literate society would really appreciate the need for greater control over their devices and actually possess the skills needed to modify and configure them.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Author admits smartphones are ubiquitous, and doesn’t at all consider, in a hypothetical situation where everyone unanimously agreed to stop using them, where all this e-waste will go?

      Pretty much every single smartphone in use right now will be ewaste 20 years from now, and most of them will be within 10. So we have that disposal problem already regardless. Hypothetically, if everyone were to get rid of their phones, we’d at least stop creating even more future ewaste.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Current smart phones will become e-waste either way. On that front, the benefit would be forcing all manufacturers to stop creating more e-waste for the future.