• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shit excuse. It takes more effort not to march in unison.

    It’s also something that is taught in UK army, since the collapsing bridge incident.

  • asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    These soldiers spend their days doing important work to defend our nation.

    The U.S. military has done nothing to defend their “nation” for over 100 years. They ONLY defend the corporate oligarchs’ ability to steal resources and use slave labor in third world countries.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lmao yet Ukraine still stands thanks to American intelligence and military apparatus.

      I’m not even an American but this kindergarten sentiment in Lemmy is so exhausting.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then promptly fucked right out of peace negotiations immediately after signing the resources deal. Fits perfectly well with

        They ONLY defend the corporate oligarchs’ ability to steal resources and use slave labor in third world countries.

      • silasmariner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah you get a lot of these ‘moral purity absolutists’ with all the nuance of an edgy teen. Some of them, or course, are edgy teens, but 100 years is a super odd choice even so. You’d think by the time they were 13 they’d have heard of at least one war that came pretty close to defense against a malign hegemonic power with ambitions of global domination…

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It really reminds me how I felt when I was an edgy 16-year old but luckily for me social media wasn’t really a thing yet so it didn’t bother anyone.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Must have forgotten that Ukraine became a US state, these edgy kids

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lmao yet Ukraine still stands thanks to American intelligence and military apparatus.

        Which they provide exactly as long as they profit exponentially from it. Dont pretend like the US would provide foreign aid out of generosity.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Looking at the conflicts they have been explictly or covertly involved in, it does seem like they are attempting to create a hegemony. That’s not to say that some good doesn’t get done along the way but it is more of a byproduct than the intent.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But… Ukraine falling to Russia would strengthen the US’s military (and cultural) hegemony over the western world. If this truly was the rationale behind the US’s involvement in Ukraine, everything we’ve done thus far would make absolutely zero sense. Strengthening Ukraine and spurring investment into the home-grown EU defense industry only serves to weaken our position as the lynchpin of NATO. A better justification for US involvement in Ukraine is that this is a great opportunity to starve Russia’s economy by forcing them into conflicts they cannot economically support (which was much the same strategy that lead to the collapse of the soviet union).

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s also a great opportunity for Russia to starve the US economy by getting them involved in conflicts it cannot economically support. And the US is far more overextended due to other conflicts.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You might have a point if the US were fighting in Ukraine, but… we’re not? We’re advising the Ukraine army, sharing intelligence we’d be gathering anyways and giving AFU a bunch of export weapon systems we found by rummaging around in the pentagon’s couch cushions. This has been a spectacular opportunity for the US because it costs us almost nothing, yet what used to be considered our biggest opponent is teetering on the brink of cultural and economic collapse. Seriously, even if Kiev were to fall tomorrow NATO would be no-contest the victor. Nobody cares about the bear any more.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You might have a point if the US were fighting in Ukraine, but… we’re not?

                Yes, we’re just sacrificing their lives for the realpolitic of weakening Russia, which is also bad.

                we found by rummaging around in the pentagon’s couch cushions… it costs us almost nothing

                Lmao, y’all actually believe this shit.

                The US spends nearly a trillion dollars a year on the military, more than the next nine countries in the world combined. Every government program designed to actually help people gets cut to feed more money into the war machine. It’s no wonder we have “military equipment between our couch cushions,” because military equipment is what virtually all our tax money goes towards, when it’s the reason we can’t have things like free healthcare or higher education. Notice how we never seem to find money between our couch cushions for those things?

                what used to be considered our biggest opponent

                Did it? Who considered the Russian Federation a bigger opponent than the PRC?

                is teetering on the brink of cultural and economic collapse

                Looked in a mirror lately? The US just elected Trump, in part because people think he represents an alternative to the disastrous establishment policies that pour endless money into pointless foreign wars, and to an economy that is working for fewer and fewer people. Seems like “on the brink of cultural collapse” describes the US to a T.

                But moreover, the whole American Empire is falling apart around us. Every year, more and more countries that are just as significant as Ukraine are choosing to make deals with China, to start trading and cooperating with them instead of us. Because the US is trying to rule the world through force and intimidation, while China is manufacturing consumer goods and building hospitals and infrastructure for developing and middle-income countries - the things we won’t even build domestically. Who would want to side with us when you can look at our domestic situation and see that it’s declining and awful? If that’s the best we can provide our own citizens, then what could we offer to other countries?

                If I were an “accelerationist,” like people sometimes baselessly accuse me of, I would 100% support spending more on the military and getting involved in these stupid unwinnable conflicts all over the world, dumping endless amounts of money towards any situation we can use bombs and not sparing a penny for actually making anyone’s life better, because those self-destructive policies will ensure the downfall of the US more than anything else could. The problem with that being, the US is likely to start WWIII in that scenario, the more clear it becomes that the military is literally the only tool that we could possibly use to maintain hegemony, since it’s the only thing we spend money on.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Oh boy. Only have time for a top three, so in no particular order:

                  Who considered the Russian Federation a bigger opponent than the PRC?

                  … Literally everyone. China was aligned as a ‘follower’ of the Russian Federation’s geopolitical lead prior to russia’s utter stomping in Ukraine. Was it incorrect? Well, obviously. But the image of the great russian bear was the specter keeping the western world up at night.

                  Looked in a mirror lately? The US just elected Trump

                  A blatant whatabboutism but just to address it: The US will be fine (diminished geopolitcally no doubt, but still in a powerful position) after this all gets sorted out internally. We survived the last trump admin, we’ll come through this one too. This just isn’t the fall of the roman empire like oh so many people are claiming, politically it just doesn’t even resemble it.

                  building hospitals and infrastructure for developing and middle-income countries - the things we won’t even build domestically.

                  I… what? We opened half a dozen hospitals in my state alone last year. Additionally, you know the US has been the world’s largest source of charity and investment in developing nations for decades, right? Look you’re repeating lines from some seriously anti-china propaganda here and it’s a little weird. You know about trump canceling USAID and why that’s bad, right?

                  There’s lots of things to criticize the US on (and it’s something I do all the time, lets be clear) but you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about.

                  (Okay, honorable mention because I just can't with this shit:)

                  when it’s the reason we can’t have things like free healthcare or higher education.

                  The reason we don’t have healthcare is fascism, not “military spending taking all the money”. We could 100% have free uni and healthcare without reducing a cent to the pentagon’s budget. In many states we even have (limited) free healthcare, entirely funded by state budgets. You’re just repeating bullshit right-wing talking points like they’re objective truth, but with a lefty spin on them.

  • hydroptic@sopuli.xyzdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They can dEfEnD oUr NaTiOn against brown peasants, but can’t march in step because they apparent forget how to do so after basic training? Shit, it’s been over 20 years since my military service and I’m 100% sure I could still manage to march in step

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been over 20 years since I was in marching band and I could absolutely do it. But not play a woodwind. That takes practice…

    • SnootBoop@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like it was too loud to hear the cadence by the reviewing stand. I don’t think it was an ability jssue or an apathy issue.

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyzdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even then you’d expect them to be able to march in step with each other even if they can’t hear some cadence.

        Like I said in another comment, I think it’s just more likely they did the bare minimum because they absolutely didn’t give a fuck about being performing monkeys for King Trump

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You need some kind of cue to keep in step. If you can see the other guys feet, that helps, but often tinted you can’t. The sound of yourself matching helps, but without some occasional cadence, or other governing factor, the speed of the match tends to change in a collective sort of way. My BMT platoon would get faster as we marched, unless the DI shouted at us occasionally.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That may be; but how many of those people just didn’t fucking care because of the dress and deportment of leadship?

      • hydroptic@sopuli.xyzdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean personally I think that’s more likely to be the real reason – they mostly looked they just didn’t give a flying fuck and didn’t want to be there.

        I just find these justifications of “well they’re busy defending our nation so they don’t learn marching” idiotic

        • America@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Go to a concert and you might hear people clapping along to a song. All they have to do is meet their hands at the proper time, at speed. Some people are a half second off, and they don’t have to maintain distance, stave off boredom, or consider their stride. Humans kinda suck without practice

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          One of the ships I was posted had to have the entire crew practice marching before a parade for freedom of the city. But we had come off of deployment not long ago.

        • callouscomic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find the parade itself more than idiotic. It’s anti-American and counter to our very principles.

          Fuck how they marched. You can have your comments but holy shit it pisses me off that you’re focusing on how they marched instead of on the abject evil forcing them to do it in the first place.

    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just think it’s odd that they’re not wearing class A’s or even B’s

      When I was in 20+ years ago they didn’t even want us stopping for gas off-post in our BDU’s on the way home from work

      Wearing white parade gloves in that uniform also just looks weird

        • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          Last time they did a parade was back in '91 after the first Gulf War, they wore a combat uniform then as well but also wearing their LBE

          But that was just after the ending of actual major combat operation, so it wasn’t entirely out of place to wear the desert uniforms that were worn for that particular theater of operation

          I’m not sure why they chose combat uniforms for Trump’s parade, maybe Trump requested them or it was a bargaining olive branch to the troops from the brass to try to keep participation high since dress uniforms are much less comfortable to wear in parades and require more effort on the part of the soldiers to prep

          I know we always did our best to avoid those kinds of events that required them

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My assumption was to try and make the troops look more menacing as a message to places like LA, really hoping for an NK dear leader style ass kissing but just got to hear the squeaking of a Sherman instead.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would bet money that this was a protest of their own. They didn’t want to be shown as North Koreans and be used as a tool like that. I appreciate what they did.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a false dichotomy, as though you can either be productive or learn to march. Obviously you could do both.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Broadly speaking, yeah. We send every member of the US Army through “Basic Training” even though 95% of them will never actually fire a gun or climb over a fence or jog ten miles in the rain for the rest of their careers.

      Parade March is a thing we don’t bother to drill into units (except specifically tasked “Parade Units” that exist to do little circus acts for the high command’s amusement). But we could do it instead of the GI Joe training for the private class janitorial staff if we felt like it.

      The bigger picture is that the US Military is a fountain of economic waste, social abuse, and pointless bloodshed in the name of machismo. Trump’s parade is just the cherry on a seven layer cake of squandered national wealth.

      But it’s the thing liberals will fixate on, because we can’t ever actually say “The Pentagon sucks ass and makes the world an objectively worse place to live in”. It always has to be about this one Great Man Of History doing things wrong in a way his hypothetical liberal alternative would not.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Parade March is a thing we don’t bother to drill into units (except specifically tasked “Parade Units” that exist to do little circus acts for the high command’s amusement).

        That is not accurate.

        https://youtu.be/aeFltEjzR2Y?t=1212

        Soldiers utilize D&C every day, by and large. Even when running. Its how soldiers are moved, as a group, from point A to point B.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, you can NOT learn to march like they do in North Korea or China and have any time left in your day to do an actual job or even train to fight. That crap takes time.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s very important for soldiers to focus on doing “important work to defend our nation” (murdering brown kids) and that they’re “productive at their jobs” (bombing hospitals)

    • idriss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I came here for this but found people already pointing it out.

      DeFeNdInG as seen by everyone else: going to places 5k km away and murdering every living thing there.

      VeTeRaNs as seen by everyone else: steroid micro-penis assholes murdering women & children

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bravest and most honorable men in our nation are doing the hard, honest work of fucking all those military wives while their chud husbands are deployed abroad.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trump just needs to up his dictator game and threaten everyone involved, especially the leadership, with jail time or dishonorable discharge if they don’t shape up and goose-step properly.

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When has the US military defended the nation? I got the impression that they’re mostly used for invading foreign countries for financial gain, cf Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Sudan, Panama, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, Guatemala, Korea.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. That’s kind of America’s whole thing. Making money. Exploiting everything. Americans are the Ferengi.

      Defending America = defending capitalism = doing whatever they can to make American, capitalist companies more profitable.

      I don’t hate capitalism. Don’t get me wrong, but I generally don’t like capitalists.

      • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Capitalists are what makes capitalism capitalism. How can you hate one without the other?

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The same way I don’t hate Christianity but most Christians drive me up a wall.

          The concepts can be good, valid and even the best option in some cases, but the way it’s weilded can be dramatically different based on the person wielding it.

          • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are comparing apples and oranges with your explanation.

            Religion and belief are two separate things.

            Christians drive you up a wall because of their beliefs not because of their religion.

            This is not the same as hating capitalists but not capitalism.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Fair, taking it off the list. It just comes up naturally when I list the horrible things the US has done bc of the highway of death. Still an example of the US military not defending the US, but definitely not an invasion of Kuwait. Thanks for the correction, I was sloppy!

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what Americans call “defending the nation”; making war in other countries than their own, believing themselves to be the world police.

      I think America has only ever been attacked… Twice… In all of history (Pearl Harbour and 9/11), and both times the defense was pretty piss poor.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure either of these events can even be counted as an attack. Pearl Harbour is roughly 3800km from the mainland. It’s basically an overseas territory. An attack there is like saying the Falkland War was an attack on the UK.

        And 9/11 was a terrorist attack, not a war. While it was a big attack, it was still only carried out by a handful of non-state-actors. That’s quite a different thing than an actual military attack by a country.

        Afaik, the last war on US soil was the civil war.

        • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hawaii was not a state for almost 2 decades after pearl harbor, so yeah.

          The original white house was burned to the ground by British/Canadian troops in 1814.

          Not to mention about 100 different American Indian Wars, though some of those were more slaughter than war.

  • TomMasz@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My volunteer fire department was able to march in sync in parades despite having enjoyed a few adult beverages beforehand. What the Army did had to be deliberate.

  • Alexander@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Russians be like “they can’t march, maybe they can’t even clean a toilet bowl with their fork or fuck and tortue a child, we totally win”

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they dislike Trump so much, they had like, you know, all their tanks there and stuff, they should have just removed him from office.