• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If World ID becomes one of Reddit’s third-party providers, it would be good news for Tools for Humanity, which was founded six years ago with the lofty goal of providing a universal basic income to the world by offering them cryptocurrency called Worldcoin in exchange for scanning their eyeballs with an Orb.

    What the actual fuck.

    Seriously how on Earth is that supposed to work?

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Selling data on people is a lucrative business. Although it is a business and not UBI.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay I’ve scanned my eyeball and I’ve got some of their worthless cryptocurrency. What about next month, do they want me to scan my eyeball again, because I guarantee it won’t have changed.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read about this a few years ago, and even saw them in a mall in Western EU.

      The whole thing is just bio-data mining, and they started by preying on some poor regions in Africa

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just a buzzword volly to get people to want to surrender more data. Actually insane premise lmao

    • possumparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got banned for more or less saying Elon is a miserable twat who deserves bad things to happen to him on that one thread where people went full board on the gruesome depictions and that was enough for a permaban. Fuck Reddit.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I got banned for saying that poisoning an invasive species like cats isn’t any different than poisoning an invasive species like rats, except that cats are cute and fluffy and rats are not.

        It was under a post about the Australian government putting up poison traps to combat the local cat population which is threatening local endangered wildlife.

  • artifex@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the one hand, I understand the inherent limitations of pseudonymous social media and why a corporation and even end users might benefit from authoritative user identification.

    On the other hand, oh hell no.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As explained, it’s not even quite user identification, but rather verification of a unique individual. The ability to identify that an account is held by a unique person (as opposed to possibility being one of many puppet accounts) is pretty useful, particularly if it’s not possible to backtrace it to an otherwise identifiable person.

      Even so, the problem I see with this system is that a person has to be careful to never, ever, ever associate their unique ID with themselves, though there will be constant pressure to do so.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, there’s someone here who has (not even exaggerating) 15+ accounts that they just rotate thru.

      It’s a hassle to block them all because I still see new ones, but I’ll take that over “proving myself” as a unique person with something like this.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think psudonyms are an issue, but verifying that a user is an actual person vs an AI chatbot is absolutely something that every popular social media platform will need to tackle at some point.

      • SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmm funny how Sam Altman is one of the few people responsible for creating that problem and now he’s selling the solution to it

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The bot problem has been around since before Sam Altman was old enough to legally drink. For example in the early days the founders of Reddit were running bots to make the site look wayyy busier than it actually was in order to attract new users.

          He’s a convenient bogey-man, and a huge asshole, but he’s the not the source of this problem.

        • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s actually low-key brilliant. Start a gold rush, when you realize the gold isn’t actually there, pivot to selling shovels and keep hyping the gold rush. Fools and their money are soon parted, and there seem to be an endless supply of them.

      • passepartout@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Will they though? Facebook has already created undisclosed bot accounts themselves before. A Platform where real users and such bots are indistinguishable (for the user) sounds like a social media corpos and authoritarian governments wet dream to me. Also reminds me of the attempts to disguise ads as natural content.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure but they only want the bots they approve of. That way they can charge for the privilege of allowing someone’s preferred bots onto the platform.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a good point. Out of all the social networks, Reddit has been the least interested in getting your personal identification.

      Most other social networks explicitly require you to provide a phone number, or implicitly require you to register from your home’s IP address, or sometimes both.

  • dkn2038@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    they already have too much info from their users, same as facebook… years ago things like this were heavily rejected (like PIPA act when the SOPA almost happened)

  • F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’d have to get me high on PCP + cocaine + some sort of crazy shit like krokodil to just implant the idea that I need to verify my very existence to a private company to post comments online or to enjoy a website.

  • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So much of what creating privacy busting biometric databases claim to do could be accomplished with speed-of-light geofencing, a.k.a. “distance-bounding protocol”. If a moderator decides messages from country X are problematic, then they can flag/block them for other users. It only requires carefully measuring ping times and basically involves banning traffic from places that can’t achieve certain minimum pings to certain trusted servers.

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish. I have noticed that I don’t see many Lenny endorsements anymore, I wonder if they remove those (I know my comment has been removed couple of times).

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tools for Humanity… was founded six years ago with the lofty goal of providing a universal basic income to the world by offering them cryptocurrency called Worldcoin in exchange for scanning their eyeballs with an Orb.

    What the fuck

  • justadudeingear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    whatever me and everyone else useful is banned. reddit can do whatever the fuck it wants its just a bunch of white supremacists i think.

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      there’s such a painfully obvious agenda over there with the admins. I got a 7 day ban for knocking russians and saying “slava ukraini” then I got a perm ban a week after that for posing the question “how long until an average citizen with an AR decides to deal with ICE themselves?” because apparently both times I was “inciting violence against a minority” because Russians and ICE agents, according to Reddit, are minorities

          • realitista@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I’m not sure why I haven’t yet. I guess I just keep thinking that there’s some topics like tech that they can’t turn into a propaganda opportunity, but they consistently prove me wrong.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i have a novelty account i kept around and i just post luigi pictures whenever it gets unbanned. it has probably only been unbanned a week this year