• fantoozie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lord have mercy on folks cooking their chicken to 400 F. Those birds will come out as dry as the sands of the Sahara.

      • fantoozie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, false equivalency, don’t you think? I have yet to meet an enjoyer of medium-rare chicken, probably because the Salmonella or Listeria already took them out

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right. You can get away with it in beef because the pathogens for that are on the surface. As long as the outside is cooked, it’s technically safe to eat. (This does not apply to ground beef, which is all mixed up).

          Chicken and pork have pathogens throughout the meat. They must be cooked all the way through.

          • fantoozie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Technically false. Taenia saginata (beef tapeworm) embeds itself in a cystic form in the skeletal muscle of cattle and is transmitted to humans through consumption of undercooked, contaminated beef. Not very common in North America, and relatively easy to catch during inspection, but youre wrong that undercooked beef is safe to eat, strictly from technical standpoint.

            Also, can you provide evidence of your claim that pathogens only infect the ‘surface’ of beef, but penetrate chicken and pork?

            That being said, I will always order beef tartare from a reputable restaurant if it’s offered. yolo

            • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s commonly known among sous vide cooking. The internal temp for sous vide beef is often <60C, and that makes some people nervous. However:

              https://www.americastestkitchen.com/articles/1131-is-sous-vide-safe

              First, let’s talk about what’s dangerous. A few types of bacteria in particular are responsible for most foodborne illness: Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter jejuni. Salmonella, a resilient group of bacteria that is most commonly found in poultry and eggs, is ingested by chickens, and then contaminates their muscle tissue, ­intestines, and ovaries. Salmonella can migrate into the muscle of chickens, meaning that they are contaminated not just on the surface but also inside the meat. Escherichia coli is a general group of bacteria that reside in the intestines of many animals, including humans. But if ingested, some strains of E. coli can wreak havoc. Campylobacter jejuni is a spiral-shaped bacteria that causes one of the most common diarrheal illnesses in humans in America.

              (Edit: emphasis added above)

              This may not be true with techniques like blade tenderization. That can transfer pathogens from the surface to the internals.

              Taenia saginata will die in only 5 minutes at 56C, which is quite a low temp even for sous vide. In fact, most beef jerky recipes will typically set the dehydrator’s temperature higher than that. It’s typical that slightly lower temps will work if it’s done for longer–jerky and sous vide usually takes several hours–but I don’t have a chart handy for taenia saginata specifically.

    • leftover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes that is about 2.5 times the recommended safe temp. I am not going the math though.

      • reattach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only ~40% higher - make sure to use absolute units when taking a ratio of temperatures.

  • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So has anyone who’s actually cooked a chicken before done the math? Because my guy just slapped this poor bird into pure carbon. Did he mean to do 205°F? It’s still too high, but it would at least be edible.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Introducing the pneumatic oven range. Place the chicken in the can and press the button… No mess cooking and bone meal blending! High calcium foods!

  • ForeverComical@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where’s the link to the YouTube video where someone tried this? I remember listening to it last time someone posted this.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah yeah we get it, Newton will fry your hand and pls don’t cook a chicken to 205°C core temp.

    BUT! What kinda physics major forgets Newton AND the fact that you won’t convert kinetic energy into heat with 100% efficiency?

    I know, three math majors in a trench coat, that’s who’ll forget it.

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You need the chicken to be 165F or 74C to be food safe. It takes a long time to cook at 100-200C because the heat is being transferred much slower. If we’re using this instant slap-based cooking method, it only needs to get to the food safe temperature.

        Using the OP’s calculations and a cooked temperature of 74C:

        It would take 8315 average slaps

        or

        A slap at around 813m/s or 1819mph.

        *Edit for a correction to the second calculation (it still might be wrong), also, I rounded the numbers to whole integers.

          • medgremlin@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look, I just finished my medical board exams recently. My brain is running on the power of about 2/3rds of a yukon gold potato here.

      • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I confirm this as a physics PhD. I also understand exactly this thinking of assuming a system is in thermal equilibrium where it is far from it (like a chicken in am oven).

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What if I wanted to cook the chicke through friction, by say inserting an object 3 fingers or so thick in and out of its cavity as fast as athletically possible? … so um… how long should I keep fucking my chicken?

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As your friendly neighborhood person with knowledge about food and cooking, 2 pounds is an absurd weight for an uncooked rotisserie chicken, that is a very small and cooked weight, 4-6 pounds is going to be typical. Also, more importantly, you cannot cook something faster by increasing the temperature past a pretty quick point, meat is an excellent insulator. No slap can cook the inside of a frozen chicken unless the entire chicken disintegrates.

    Tbf though, a slap at 3700 mph would absolutely disintegrate the chicken.

    • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, if you cooked it to 400 degrees it would be disgusting. You just need to cook it to 165. This guy might know about physics but he has never cooked anything before.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve read that bone-in chicken should actually get to 190°F as this is when the collagen renders, but Idk it was on the Internet so…

        • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is basically the foundation of barbecue. Off you have a cut of meat that’s tough and high in connective tissue, if you cook it at a low temperature for a long time, once it gets around 190 the collagens start to break down and the meat gets tender. Things like chuck roasts, brisket, pork shoulder.

          This has nothing to do with chicken though. A chicken breast, bone in or not, will be disgustingly dry at 190 degrees.

        • Wolf@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can cook chicken legs to a higher temp like 180-185°F, but if you do that with white meat it will be dry af.

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s right, it was when I was looking up the best way to cook a chicken quarter, or rather 60 of them.