ruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agoWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comexternal-linkmessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squarecurbstickle@anarchist.nexuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoJust not snaps. AppImage and flatpak are fine though
minus-squarechocrates@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoWhats wrong with snaps? My only “issue” with appimages is i tend to leave them in my downloads folder and lose them
minus-squarecurbstickle@anarchist.nexuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoThe snap store is a shit show of security issues. Forced migration to snaps. Performance issues. Proprietary back end. Slow to install Slow to start Eat up RAM Eat up disk space They screw up access to devices. They automatically update themselves without user confirmation. Fuck snaps. Fuck Canonical.
minus-squarealfredon996@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoMy issues with snaps are: The server software is closed source and centralized They create many block devices that can slow down booting the PC.
Just not snaps.
AppImage and flatpak are fine though
Whats wrong with snaps? My only “issue” with appimages is i tend to leave them in my downloads folder and lose them
The snap store is a shit show of security issues.
Forced migration to snaps.
Performance issues.
Proprietary back end.
Slow to install
Slow to start
Eat up RAM
Eat up disk space
They screw up access to devices.
They automatically update themselves without user confirmation.
Fuck snaps. Fuck Canonical.
My issues with snaps are: