• zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google can get fucked. I feel like there will be a nontrivial market for de-googled or older and unlocked Android phones after this. If they manage to kill off custom roms with their previous AOSP rug pull I’ll go back to using a (subpar) Linux phone or maybe even one of those cheap flip phones.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I started joking that my next phone will be a Nokia 3310. I feel more and more each day like that should just be my actual next phone

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s more and more people who feel just like you do. I’m so exhausted of all these companies being predatory and anti consumer. I’m the type to stand my ground and abstain or find alternatives, but it feels like there’s 5 people who don’t care and 4 people who will just let it go for every person willing to boycott bullshit.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes there are dozens of people who care. The vast majority of people never sideload.

          • fishy@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m making a statement about companies in general. People are just so willing to bend over and take it. In my mind people used to have more gumption, but I’m probably overestimating how much was individuals vs how the media portrayed things.

            Feels like if Upton Sinclair released “the jungle” today we’d all collectively say “oh well, guess we’re eating rats and formaldehyde.”

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny enough, Nokia started making cheap flip phones and some others in that form factor again. My daughter asked to replace her smartphone with one of the flip phones. It was only $70, so I got her one. It’s build quality is what you would expect, but it works and has GPS at least.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They even actually re-released a version of the 3310 a few years back. I

          still have my old Garmin knocking about, wonder if it’s got updated maps if I got a model without GPS.

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It even runs WhatsApp and Signal now, or at least, that was the plan a while back. And it’s only like 60 euros or something. Perfect for multiple day festivals and camping trips at least.

            • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It no longer runs WhatsApp, actually. The new version of the OS (KaiOS which is a fork of the dead Firefox OS) broke compatibility and Meta apparently decided to not bother with supporting it.

    • Drew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Graphene and PostmarketOS. Biggest issue is banks and other organisations that only want to make apps that run in locked down environments. There needs to be a real push to bring in legislation to make this stuff work.

  • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I first read the original report from Android Authority thinking it would only be an additional hurdle for third-party stores and developers, but I’m now thinking that it would potentially block the use of ReVanced

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      and any apk installed eventually, and custom OS, that doesnt come from the google store front. im not tech savvy but im using apk of many apps right now. if only someone can develop a “storefront” where it seperate from google.

    • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless revanced somehow gets the APKs resigned it will almost certainly destroy revanced.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if I come up with a random package name, like “online.discuss.jim3692”, register that name and a keypair, and then build ReVanced using that name and keys?

          • jim3692@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What if I keep the apks for me and my family, instead of publicly releasing them.

            This is probably similar to the state of Piped and Invidious. Google tries to kill them, so we are hosting private instances, instead of relying on public ones.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I don’t know what they’ll block yet but I’m already assuming some of my apps will be blocked. It’s pretty terrible news. I really didn’t want to have to hunt down a phone that was compatible with alternative OS’s.

      • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        From my understanding, it will only allow apps that were registered, so since ReVanced uses identical package names to the patched apps, it probably won’t work unless they start using ReVanced-specific package names that are tied to their identity. But that would allow Google to block these package names (or ban ReVanced completely) if say, Spotify or YouTube complain about them.

        • archonet@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          if say, Spotify or YouTube complain about them.

          … who owns YouTube?

          Yeah, they’re going to block ReVanced.

  • teyiko6366@bin.pol.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google’s move to block sideloading of unverified Android apps marks a major shift toward tighter security. While it aims to curb malware and fraud, it also raises concerns about user freedom and indie developer access—Android’s openness is slowly fading. mcdvoice

  • Mwa@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Android sideloading needs to be verified by googld for “Security” then Maybe IOS seems like a viable option (except for the price and price to repair) but man i wish Linux on smartphones Has a good ecosystem of apps.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    only malware i have read about on android have came from google’s oh so safe store.

  • Coopr8@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one talking about how this could completely annihilate open source .apk development? First off the lead dev has to get identity verified to get a key, which will reduce the number of devs willing to push through friction to start a project. Then when the key is issued and it is posted to the repository, what keeps anyone from grabbing it and using it for another repo? We’ll they have an official app registration of some kind, ok, what about version control? Does every new version have to be registered before it can be loaded and tested? Same for forks?

    This is about to be a terrible mess, Google is assassinating FOSS with this.

    • Awkwardparticle@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will kill everyone that is playing around with the phones. I have done a couple mobile projects where I just sideloaded the package I created to quickly test it and to demo it to people. Now that I can’t do that why would I develop for your platform by choice.

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You distribute the code without your key and a built package that is signed. This isn’t exactly rocket science.

      Anyone who forks the code will have to use their own key to install a package they built.

      It’s just unnecessary red tape.

      • kureta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just unnecessary red tape.

        Which will reduce the number of people using foss apks, which will in turn, reduce the motivation, and then the number, of foss apk developers.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fdroid itself and every package they host will have to be signed.

          Maybe there are still workarounds, like enabling dev mode on your phone, but still tedious.

  • Bongles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It also becomes no different than iPhone, so… what’s keeping me to android if they do this? Or hey, maybe I’ll commit to de-googling. I have CoMaps, I’m planning to setup nextcloud soon… Hell, I don’t even buy anything on Google play anymore since it’s so shit, i have no purchases tying me to the OS. Maybe I’ll buy a cheap old iPhone so I can finally use imessage with everyone that’s been bitching about me and use other tech for everything else.

    (I’m not going to iPhone, but the point stands)

    • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is precisely one of my main lines of reasoning; I’ve thought about this for a long, long time, and I’m switching to Apple iPhone. I’m keeping a Oukitel Titan for Android stuff ((Grayjay)). But I’m getting the 17 Extra Pro Max Plus Plus or whatever for a main.

    • tmyakal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m wondering why I even need a smartphone at this point. I’m tempted to go back to a flip phone.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I left iphone because of a walled garden issue, was thinking about working with my parents off of iphone so I can actually assist with them because I’ve been off of it for decades.

      Instead may be the other direction because at least iOS has a modicum of privacy by at least telling the US government to make their own back doors instead of just licking the boot like google does. I’m not a fan of apple by any stretch of the imagination, but at this point of the falling apart world fuck it, I gotta figure out what the least evil is, even if it’s only marginal.

  • arararagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This a massive overreach and so stupid when nowadays apple even relaxed their limitations a little, I heard that iOS users don’t need to jailbreak anymore to use outside apps. What will be the point of android?

  • CodingCarpenter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So say you want to move to one of these other OS’s graphene or whatever. Do those work with modern banking apps? Pretty much the only reason they haven’t done The switch so far is because Bank of America would tell me to fuck right off as far as I know

    • SitD@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      you can pack them on the magisk denylist and then they might work flawlessly.

      this has never failed me but i would still not recommend it.

      these banks and Google have no hesitation to cut your access to your money one day. they own your way of interacting with the web now and they don’t like what you’re attempting here

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about we abandon proprietary locked-down launcher sandboxes on our phones and just run regular old Linux on them like we do on the desktop?

    Isn’t that what PostmarketOS is? Is there some bullshit firmware issue in the way of that? What exactly is stopping us?

    • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is that mobile phone hardware is commonly more locked down by default than x86 hardware. Whatever phone you have now likely has some weird shit on it that makes it really difficult to do anything but what the manufacturer wants you to do. What Microsoft is trying to do with Win11 and TPM 2.0, has basically already been done with many brands of smartphone. I’ve been trying to research affordable smartphones to daily drive that are also de-googled, and hours of research has resulted in me struggling to use a pinephone. The hardware, the software, they’re just not there, either. It’s not like desktop Linux where really it’s better than Windows if you give it a chance. Mobile FOSS OSes might be daily drivable if you try really hard.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What OS did you put on it and what issues have you run into? I’ve been considering the Pinephone Pro because it seemed both more flexible and cheaper than a Librem.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the benefit of those reacting based on the headline and one-sentence summary, yes it’s a pain, I agree with the mob that it should be the user’s choice what they install, BUT, the headline is badly written, in that it implies that the app itself has to be verified, and also many commenters seem to have also inferred that it means an Apple walled-garden style Play Store lock-in which also isn’t the case. (a better headline might have been “sideloading of Android apps from unverified publishers”)

    You can still publish and run apps from outside of the Play Store, but publishers will need to get a verified key from Google to sign them with. Google don’t have any visibility of what the app actually is, they just issue you a key and you do whatever you want with it.

      • critical@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then they controll who gets a key and if you sign something that’s isn’t OK with them - revocation

    • Cochise@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any developer of piracy or emulation related software will not apply for the registration, because the trail will point to they official identity, opening a flank to legal actions. This will kill piracy in Android.

    • ReluctantZen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed on the headline, but having to ID yourself as a developer to Google even if you’re not using the Play Store is fucked too. It’s a big step towards a walled garden.

    • JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      All Google would have to do is check what key an app is using on a user’s device and they can invalidate it. Someone made a youtube vanced 2 (not revanced)? Google can easily invalidate it for everyone using this process.

      Even if I misunderstand how the key works and it’s more of a signature, it would mean that if you try to download an older app then it could fail bc the signature expired and isn’t maintained anymore. You also run into the same issue with not being renewed if Google chooses.

      My point is it could effectively be a side loading killer, maybe not right away but the point of sideloading is the independence which this takes away