• Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t played 4, but I played 1, 2, and a bit of the presequel or whatever it was called. They were essentially all the same game. Run, shoot, run, shoot, hear vaguely off-color joke, run, shoot. Is there any particular reason to bother with an overpriced remake of the same old game? Is there a reason for worrying about 4KUHD textures on a game where the aesthetic is cartoony? If you’re a 9 year old who’s never played, and it’s all on mom’s dime, I could see being tricked into buying it by the advertisers, but why is anyone else excited about it?

    • MadameBisaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Started with 2, liked it, hated 3, now playing 4 since yesterday with a friend and gameplay wise it has a bunch of changes/improvements. So if someone enjoys the gameplay its good. I mean cod and battlefield and fifa are also nearly the same game every time ;)

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any interest I had in the game, which was already fairly minimal, was completely obliterated when the price was announced.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I played the hell out of the first Borderlands (including New Game+ across all expansions), but promptly bounced off 2 & Pre-Sequel because it literally just felt like more of the same and I was already sated.

      BL3 and now BL4 are literally just more of the same, but with ever increasingly more egregious monetisation.

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that was the one that started in an ice zone, if I remember correctly? I literally couldn’t get past it because I find that aesthetic quite boring…

          • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The ice zone (Southern Shelf) is only the very beginning of the game, you reach more interesting areas after defeating the first major boss, Captain Flynt.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have accepted reality and not purchased the game.

    Thanks for the heads up Bobandy.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was going to say… Who is out there buying games way outside their machines’ specs? Seems pretty straightforward.

      I do get a little annoyed at the folks angry at BL4 using a higher end engine. Like, it does look a lot better than previous iterations. That engine upgrade wasn’t for nothing.

      There are a ton of looter shooters floating around that aren’t using the Unreal 5 engine. Just play one of those instead. Hell, go back and play BL1. I’m pretty sure that thing runs on a toaster.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This game does into the twenties on a freaking 4070 at 1440 on high settings and doesn’t even get 60 at medium settings

        Now let’s take a look at the “recommended specs” Randy put out there

        NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 / AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT / Intel Arc B580

        Sorry but when in the world is that even remotely acceptable that you consider last Gen was outside machine specs when the developers said sure two generations ago is perfectly fine, which btw, holy crap it’s not.

      • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a 3090 in a 7800x3d box with 64 gb ram and I had to drop from 7680x2160 to 3840x1080 to get decent framerates. I get better performance in Star Citizen. After a few CTD’s I just went ahead and got a refund.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a difference between a game being way outside of your specs because it’s graphically very advanced and your hardware is old, and a game just being unoptimized slop that expects its users to deal with by throwing higher specs at a fixable problem.

        I have a brand new 5070ti that can play all kinds of UE5 games with much better graphics than BL4 at 4k resolution with ray tracing at a decent frame rate without relying on frame gen. And I’m in the top few percentiles here.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I hear from people actually able to play the game, it’s better than 3.

        Something like:

        2 > 4 > 1 > 3 > Pre-Sequel

      • CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I honestly don’t know what this “trainwreck” talk is. BL3 was passable. I didn’t like the antagonists, but the game played fine if purples dropped way too much and the new guns weren’t great. People make it seem like it was the Worst Game Ever and I don’t get it. The pre-sequel was hot garbage, but 3 was fine.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          there’s no nuance in anything anymore. you can’t just say “oh this isn’t really for me, honestly.”

          you have to write 18 paragraphs about the fall of the video game industry because of this one game and how its hot trash, kills newborns while they sleep, etc.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s hard to consider an 81 on OpenCritic to be a trainwreck. People tend to buy games that review well, especially when it’s a co-op shooter with basically no competition.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          bl3 is a fine game. its just critics of it are so very vocal that nobody feels like saying they like it.

        • Screen_Shatter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn I had to look that up cause it seemed unbelievable. I am shocked it reviewed that well. It just seemed so awful to me.

          Am I so out of touch?? No, the children are.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, that game’s great. The writing’s not good, especially for the villains, but people like that game because it’s good.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You aren’t out of touch. Even the worst games don’t get that poor of a review. When you job depends on being on their side, it turns out you can’t voice an honest opinion.

    • Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well it shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone, but Randy Pitchford is really good at providing ammo for these types of headlines. Guy needs to learn to keep his mouth shut sometimes.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s 100% an astroturfing campaign. Doesn’t matter if it looks good or bad, it’s still getting awareness out there about the game which generates clicks and probably makes more money than the game itself.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That would be hard to believe, because the game already conservatively made tens of millions of dollars in a few days.

  • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    All this stuff sounds like Randy Pitchford building out his personal brand.

    I wish anything involving Pitchford was not reported on (at all).

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Countdown to him getting fired in 3…2…3…4…8…49…

    Because companies ultimately seem to love leaders that are toxic these days.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        He wasn’t the only founder and Embracer bought them in 2021. Later TakeTwo acquired the studio when Embracer had to restructure. They operate under 2k now so he can most surely be fired.

        Also probably why he is even more of a cocky cunt nowadays. He already cashed out.

        • Mortoc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I worked for Take-Two. The bankers that run that company absolutely see the world the way Randy does. Fuck’em.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          1 was a flawed revolution and had great dlc. 2 was … A very clear sign of stagnation but has one of the greatest badguys in multiplayer gaming.

          There were a few interesting moments and side stories and unique characters after that, but for example, the transitory moment of seeing Ashley Burke come alive as Tiny Tina was once in a lifetime chance that you had to live through in that year/era. Going back now, it’s not really that special since everything is derivative and we live in the future.

          • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Glad you enjoyed the games, I suppose. But I never really cared for the Borderlands games and reading how Pitchford is behaving makes me not want to even try the games.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guys who wear bowties are not smart, but desperately need people to think they are.

    • abcdqfr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What french fuckin year is it where ANYONE feels the NEED to wear a bowtie?! You can just wear your boxers as a neckerchief if you like…

    • OmegaMan@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bowties are fine for formal (social) occasions like weddings and parties. Wearing them around every day is weird. Wearing them to work is (generally) weird.

      Committing to wearing them everywhere and STILL buying pre-tied ones and not learning how to tie them yourself all while being a mega douche is cringe af.

        • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Finally, someone agrees with me on the fucking bow tie thing.

          Love the tie. Wear the tie. Talk about the tie. If you can’t tie the tie but you do the first 3, I can’t respect you.

      • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, I think he might actually fall into the category of cares more about appearing smart than being smart. Not to say he’s dumb, but I do get the sense the reputation is very important to him

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          i think it’s more about him having gotten used to it when he played a character on a children’s programme. he also has the face for it, which randall does not.

        • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Celebrities with distinct looks almost by definition have to be exceptions to this discussion. Wearing a giant clock necklace to work would absolutely be weird unless it were Flavor Flav.

  • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have come to accept that this is a PR campaign to plaster the name everywhere all over social media and let it worm its way into currently pissed off gamers’ heads for a few months down the line when they’ve calmed down and inevitably buy the fucking thing.

    Pitchford is a slimeball. Rarely has a man who is allegedly not an insurance or used-car salesman given off such nakedly scummy vibes.

    We need to stop giving free publicity to this little marketing man, and to this poorly optimised, expensive game.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think there’s anything that well thought out, and it’s just someone who takes things personally and cant resist blurting out their thoughts.

      Since after what he said my thinking was even if my friends beg me to get the game on discount I wont because of how personally irritated the comments have made me.

      • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not casting aspersions towards you personally, but we all know how gamer boycotts go generally. As in, they don’t. People cave and buy the games anyway, once they’re over the initial outrage. This is 100% marketing.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.cadeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those people buy games regardless. But this feels like a personal challenge of being called out. Like the face popping out and going “yeah I knew you couldn’t resist bitch”. Usually there isn’t that psychological push back being put out there. It’s not needed.

          • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’ll see how it comes out in the sales figures, I suppose! I would like to believe you’re right but I just have absolutely not a jot of faith that people will stick to their outrage. 😂

        • jimerson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m enjoying the game. And yeah, a lot of cool folk work there. Sure a few suck, but there are a lot of neat humans that poured their heart into this game.

          I also haven’t had a single issue on a two year old mid-tier laptop so i can’t empathize with the fuss over performance. I’m sure there are older machines out there that wont run it at 1000FPS or whatever.

          At the end of the day, it’s a game. Calm tf down and play something else rather than raise your blood pressure over something so relatively trivial.

          Deep breath people. It’s a game. Support it or don’t. Edginess not required for this decision.

        • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They got paid already and most of them will be laid off or moved to different projects by the time the games is $20.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not that he’s a tool it’s at the game it has poor performance. And being a tool is just a guarantee that issue will never be fixed.

          So in a way I kind of do blame the team, they must have done testing they know what the performance is like.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I played the first one but after that the formula felt pretty samey and I was bored of it. Would a fourth Borderlands game even be good if it wasn’t laggy?

  • Greddan@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re using a poorly made graphics engine and got scammed into implementing malware into their game.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gearbox was been scummy for a while now. Customers can learn to stop giving them money or can keep putting up with this.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Borderlands 3 kinda sucked it. I realized when I played it that they had hit peak during Borderlands 2.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, the people are dumb as fuck and will keep buying their slop. Just look at Nintendo, one of the most horrible companies out there, releasing the same 5 games over and over again, but the idiots keep buying. They will keep buying their Mario Kart until it’s $200 a month

    • moonburster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They destroyed the first update for risk of rain 2 when they bought it as well. They kinda made my favourite game a lot worse

  • C1pher@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has been there already with Ubisoft games. It wont end well for the IP and also, the main problem is Randy Pitchford. That problem wont be fixed any time soon.