If you live in the USA, this has Terri Schiavo-energy all around. It’s different, I know. Terri was alive and braindead. This infant is gonna die. The court is sparing the infant pain.

But why would you keep a child alive to suffer? It’s like Terri in that the parents refuse to think about anyone other than themselves. That’s just cruel / terrible / bad.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Parents are grieving and I hesitate to judge their irrational actions because grief isn’t a logical process.

    They think they’re saving their child by refusing to say good bye. Unfortunately they’re being enabled by people with political agendas.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    This has happened a couple times in the UK. It’s a lot different than the USA for a few reasons, one being the NHS isn’t gonna waste money on someone who has like a .0001% chance of recovery (and why should they?).

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      These decisions aren’t about the cost of care, they’re about the interests of the individual and, in this case, not prolonging suffering unnecessarily.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 years ago

      People with ALS also have a terminal condition that requires life support. Maybe the NHS will start removing their ventilators too, to spare them further suffering.