Is anyone actually surprised by this?

      • Bleys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Realistically what is the worst thing China is doing with your private data? Selling it? If you’re not a Chinese National, at least you don’t fall under their jurisdiction.

        If you’re a U.S. citizen, with all the tech oligarchs cozying up to the current administration, I’d be a lot more concerned with Facebook/Twitter/Etc collecting your data.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The CCP is significantly more oppressive, gives zero shits about human rights or trademarks or really anyone at all. The US at least pretends to care.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Based on what? The US imprisons more people, kills more people, tortures more people. The only way to argue that China is more oppressive is basically to start with the assumption they are and then work backwards to justify it.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I listed a handful of reasons above, of which no one has denied or refuted. Just downvoted.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Actually you didn’t. You listed a bunch of accusations against China (which were refuted, you just ignored that), but you didn’t even try to explain how that’s more oppressive than the USA. Even if all your accusations were true, the US is still more oppressive.

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I see you are sticking with the pack here and going with generic denial and ignoring my arguments rather than actually refuting them.

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            The US is in the process of deporting all its migrants and threatening invasions on half the world.

            I get that gringos don’t want to own up to their complicity by inaction but you oughta stop pontificating about how other governments are worse. Unless they’re called Israel, they weren’t before and they sure as fuck aren’t now.

              • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Lmaooo hurting gringos feelings is being racist? Y’all have had concentration camps for longer than you’ve been without them, you know their fucking addresses and they’re still there.

                Do forgive me for throwing y’all’s opinions on racism in the dustbin.

              • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                For the past week the people of China and the United States, as well as other countries have been comparing notes. Debunking propaganda on both sides. Realizing that much of what we’ve all been told for years/decades, has been lies.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              …which truth came out? They don’t have CCP officials required by law to work at tech companies and disclose any and all data they acquire? They’re not using Uyghur slaves in their factories? They’re not trying to literally erase Taiwan off the maps? They’re not still censoring information about their horrific pasts? They’re not targeting, retaliating against and kidnapping protestors domestic and abroad? They’re not censoring virtually every US social website entirely from the entire country? Please bring me up to speed.

              • TreeGhost@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I’m not here to defend the Chinese government or anything, but there is an argument to be made that the US has an equivalency to each one of these things.

                CCP officials at tech companies - NSA backdoors

                Uyghur slaves - Prison labor aka war on drugs

                Taiwan - Gaza/Literally any “3rd world” nation with oil

                Censorship - Right wing media empires/red state bills targeted to downplay US atrocities taught in schools

                Retaliation against protestors - Police brutality Social media censorship - Oligarchs owned social media

                I think a lot of people are less falling for Chinese propaganda and more overcoming US propaganda.

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  If you think any of those are remotely the same, you’re simply delusional.

                • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  With the caveat that we have tons of actual evidence for the US equivalent, whereas the claims that China does those things are usually “We absolutely swear they do bro” from the people who swore Hamas was raping babies or whatever.

              • Kras Mazov@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                E: any of you downvoters, feel free to correct me, I’d love to be wrong.

                You throw a bunch of claims with zero source and wants to be taken seriously. At least give us the bare minimum before just spewing this much US State Department propaganda.

                That being said, I will address some of your points, since someone else might stumble upon this and need an actual answer.

                They don’t have CCP officials required by law to work at tech companies and disclose any and all data they acquire?

                Keeping a close look on the companies on their country and keeping them on a short leash is good actually. China is not a capitalist hellhole like the US or most of the world, it is a socialist state where the rich does not control the government. Keeping them in check is the right thing to do given their current development level of socialism.

                They’re not using Uyghur slaves in their factories?

                That’s a new one, so far I have only heard about how they are being genocided. Which you can debunk with a little bit of research: Arab League’s visit to Xinjiang rejects Western accusations of ethnic genocide, religious persecution.

                They’re not trying to literally erase Taiwan off the maps?

                LMAO, no. Taiwan is part of China, why would China want to erase part of itself off the map? Even the US agrees. The only thing China wants is proper reunification with Taiwan.

                They’re not still censoring information about their horrific pasts?

                What “horrific past”? Be specific, this vague stance achieves nothing. If you’re talking about Tiananmen Square, here’s a good video about that: The Tiananmen Square “Massacre” Never Happened.

                They’re not targeting, retaliating against and kidnapping protestors domestic and abroad?

                Again, provide a damn source, I have no idea of what you’re talking about and it is something I never saw anyone claim before.

                What I can do tho is bring into attention the names of a few people like Huey P. Newton being killed by the US government and Snowden having to seek asylum abroad after blowing the whistle on the US surveillance state for the world to see. And if that’s not enough, how about Pro-Palestinian protesters clash with US police on second night of DNC and New Report Details How Pro-Palestinian Protests Are Suppressed in Democratic Countries.

                They’re not censoring virtually every US social website entirely from the entire country?

                No they are not, Microsoft operates in China. Not only that, but they do not explicitly want to simply ban US sites on there, it’s a simple matter of national sovereignty where companies like Facebook and Google refuse to abide by Chinese law, so China simply developed all their tools in-house. Not only that, but Chinese citizens have access to VPNs and can easily access websites abroad that are not usually allowed in China.

                Meanwhile the US banned Huawei and tried to ban TikTok when it became apparent they could not control it and that the people were seeing the US for what it truly is, a genocidal state funding Israel in it’s attempt to genocide the Palestinian people.

                The last link I posted is a proxy on 12ft.io since The Intercept won’t allow to see the page without registering.

              • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                ’d love to be wrong.

                No you wouldn’t. If you were, you’d have listen to the many people that probably have corrected you on all those State Department talking points

                • Ulrich@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  That’s never happened. And being that you haven’t either, I think it’s a fair guess that it won’t anytime soon.

        • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Realistically what is the worst thing China is doing with your private data?

          Probably mapping out the extended support networks of democratic activists in Taiwan to prepare to throw them in jail after a forcible military takeover.

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            So democratic activists in Taiwan have extensive networks in the US?

            I mean, you said it.

          • mspencer712@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            This makes me sad, that we can’t engage in civil discussion about this. Why did you assume and not ask questions? Be curious, not judgmental.

            To me it’s a question of laws. The laws of the U.S. at least somewhat constrain the people of my own country, and can prevent them from working against their own citizens. Like me.

            Please be kind when replying.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      but it’s a foreign actor so OOooooOOWwwwooOOOO sCaRrRey!

      I love that people think this is a solid own. Lest we forget Hong Kong, or an impending hot war in Taiwan or building out extradition systems with an expanding network of countries to forcibly repatriate and torture dissidents and human rights lawyers.

      You used to not have to explain why authoritarianism was bad.

      • Foni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It used to not be necessary because democracies used to have moral authority but since the revelations of Manning and Snowden non-Americans see no difference between giving our data to the USA or to China or any other. We also know from the reaction to the war in Ukraine and Gaza that human rights claims are only sometimes used.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        or an impending hot war in Taiwan

        When you can’t even find things that China actually has done to complain about, so you have to start complaining about things they haven’t done.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Anti terrorism is good, actually. I don’t support people kicking seniors for speaking mandarin to try to bully a government into not prosecuting murderers in the mainland, which was the reason the protests happened (that and Washington money)

        • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Western authorities have been harvesting data for a few decades from social media so any complaint that singles out Chinese apps doing the same is obviously rooted in sinophobia.

          The fact you think my joking about racists doing that is pathetic shows which side of that assertion you fall.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is probably only a problem with the online version. In contrast to google and openAI they, like meta, let you download the model and run it offline, where they can’t access any of this data I presume.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anyone using DeepSeek as a service the same way proprietary LLMs like ChatGPT are used is missing the point. The game-changer isn’t that the Chinese company DeepSeek can compete with OpenAI and its ilk as an AI service provider—it’s that now any organization with a few million dollars to train and host their own model can compete with OpenAI.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d like to look into that, how can I train an existing model further?

      I’m only playing around with ollama, but like to do a bit more - mostly just to fulfill my needs to understand things - but have no idea where to start

        • naeap@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Python is not a problem
          SW Dev is my job. Just never had real contact with AI before, besides playing around a bit.

          Thank you very much for the link!!

          Edit: thank you very much again, that was pretty much exactly what I was looking for.
          Don’t know how I missed to checkout huggingface. Thought of it always just as a github for models and didn’t bother checking for docs…
          But that’s a great intro with simple tools/tutorials to get a grip on it, thanks!

      • mac@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Onprem has always been cheaper. Cloud compute was the most successful marketing campaign I can think of.

    • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Billions of folk’s keyboards are connected to the internet and the vast majority of them have no idea. It’s absolutely ludicrous that we’ve gotten to this stage with surveillance capitalism. Internet-connected keyboards are malware, plain and simple.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sure, but its open source and doesn’t upload it anywhere. Also doesn’t have internet permission

  • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Unrelated but yesterday I saw a post where the person was mocking those concerned by the chinese getting their data, saying things like “why would they care” and some people sarcastically saying they wouldn’t understand the data because “it was in another language”. Were those people right or not?

  • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I swear people do not understand how the internet works.

    Anything you use on a remote server is going to be seen to some degree. They may or may not keep track of you, but you can’t be surprised if they are. If you run the model locally, there is no indication it is sending anything anywhere. It runs using the same open source LLM tools that run all the other models you can run locally.

    This is very much like someone doing surprised pikachu when they find out that facebook saves all the photos they upload to facebook or that gmail can read your email.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    “We store the information we collect in secure servers located in the People’s Republic of China”

    Now you Americans know how we Europeans feel when Google, Amazon and Facebook store our information on American servers. Hint: The protective wall between Chinese servers and their government are about as good as the one between American servers and their government - at least for non-US citizens. The last thin veil of privacy for Eurpeans has been ripped to shreds by Trump last week.

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The last thin veil of privacy for Eurpeans has been ripped to shreds by Trump last week.

      What did he do? I know Trump does not like the GDPR, but did he sign something affecting it last week?

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        He killed the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. Theoretically, no company is allowed to transfer data of European citizens to US-based servers anymore. Sadly, Ursula von der Leyen is lacking the balls to act on this.

        • Ferk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Thanks, I did not know. I think you are referring to this: https://www.freevacy.com/news/noyb/trumps-actions-to-dismantle-pclob-threatens-eu-us-data-transfers/6088

          To be completely honest… as an European I would be happy if they actually did make it so that no EU-US data transfer were allowed… we need to stop depending on all these US-based services… but like you said, they probably don’t have the balls to pull the plug. Which makes me wonder if that board was actually really any protection at all for privacy or it had always been an empty shell used as an excuse on both sides just to keep up appearances and maintain the plug on.

          I honestly think this could be a win for us. Worst case scenario, nothing really changes but some masks fall off and at least some people would stop acting under false pretense.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everyone must ask to see Xi jing jing ping pong nudes! But without mentioning Xi or nudes.

    That would be a great way of poisoning their plans.

  • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    no sh*t! now tell me, not that it’s correct, but what does the chinese intelligence apparatus can do to me vs. what the u.s. intelligence apparatus (which has been collecting intelligence about me since i’m alive) can do to me?

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      They both can and frequently do influence the information you are exposed to on social media to influence your decision making. Not you specifically, unless you someone very important, but your demographic in a broader sence. The more data they have on you, the more effective this process is.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        and that’s what superpowers do, but living in a third world country i’m yet to see the chinese putsch us as the u.s. did during the cold war and beyond, with all due consequences. sorry about my lack of goodwill towards the department of state.

        • dawnglider@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The funny thing is that I would realistically only care about, for example, the Russian government collecting my data if their oligarchy collaborated with my government’s oligarchy against my and the population’s interest (which I guess in this case is significantly more likely than China)

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        They both can and frequently do influence the information you are exposed to on social media to influence your decision making.

        You know what they say about assertions made without evidence.

    • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a queer woman in the US, I currently care infinitely more what the US gov and companies track about me than what China does.

  • Azenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I trust DeepSeek Open Source if it allows me to copy and review it. I don’t trust OpenAI like ChatGPT.

    • randomname@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Is Deepseek Open Source?

      Hugging Face researchers are trying to build a more open version of DeepSeek’s AI ‘reasoning’ model

      Hugging Face head of research Leandro von Werra and several company engineers have launched Open-R1, a project that seeks to build a duplicate of R1 and open source all of its components, including the data used to train it.

      The engineers said they were compelled to act by DeepSeek’s “black box” release philosophy. Technically, R1 is “open” in that the model is permissively licensed, which means it can be deployed largely without restrictions. However, R1 isn’t “open source” by the widely accepted definition because some of the tools used to build it are shrouded in mystery. Like many high-flying AI companies, DeepSeek is loathe to reveal its secret sauce.

      • GrosPapatouf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        The runner is open source, and that’s what matter in this discussion. If you host the model on your own servers, you can ensure that no corporation (american or Chinese) has access to your data. Access to the training code and data is irrelevant here.

        • randomname@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The guys at HF (and many others) appear to have a different understanding of Open Source.

          As the Open Source AI definition says, among others:

          Data Information: Sufficiently detailed information about the data used to train the system so that a skilled person can build a substantially equivalent system. Data Information shall be made available under OSI-approved terms.

          • In particular, this must include: (1) the complete description of all data used for training, including (if used) of unshareable data, disclosing the provenance of the data, its scope and characteristics, how the data was obtained and selected, the labeling procedures, and data processing and filtering methodologies; (2) a listing of all publicly available training data and where to obtain it; and (3) a listing of all training data obtainable from third parties and where to obtain it, including for fee.

          Code: The complete source code used to train and run the system. The Code shall represent the full specification of how the data was processed and filtered, and how the training was done. Code shall be made available under OSI-approved licenses.

          • For example, if used, this must include code used for processing and filtering data, code used for training including arguments and settings used, validation and testing, supporting libraries like tokenizers and hyperparameters search code, inference code, and model architecture.

          Parameters: The model parameters, such as weights or other configuration settings. Parameters shall be made available under OSI-approved terms.

          • The licensing or other terms applied to these elements and to any combination thereof may contain conditions that require any modified version to be released under the same terms as the original.

          These three components -data, code, parameter- shall be released under the same condition.

  • Ju135@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    This make the news only because it’s going to chinese servers. Didn’t see anything like that about ChatGPT or the one made by Google.

  • ozoned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Chinese company does what American companies have done for 25+ years now!

    Is it time for REAL data privacy laws or are we just gonna keep playing whack-a-mole with Chinese tech companies that get us nowhere?

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Our data’s just too valuable for these parasites. Data privacy laws may eventually pass to compel software companies to store everything in US servers only.

      • ozoned@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Excellent Point. If that’s the case though, then wouldn’t other countries follow suit which still limits big tech’s reach and makes them less profitable and less powerful? Idk. Guess we’ll see how it plays out. Either way, I’m staying as far from those ecosystems as possible to at least try to mitigate some of what they do. I’ll never be totally successful, genie is put of the bottle, but we can at least attempt.