• MotoAsh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ehh… I wouldn’t say socialism affirms communism. At least far less than it condemns capitalism.

    Nobody currently alive is going to accept private property entering a gray area where if you produce with it, suddenly it’s not your property any more.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not really how socialism or communism works, though. It isn’t a legalistic moral code, but the adoption of collectivized production at a global scale.

    • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody currently alive is going to accept private property entering a gray area where if you produce with it, suddenly it’s not your property any more.

      Speak for yourself, there are plenty of people alive that would be fine with there being no more private property. Personal property isn’t the same thing, and it’s fine producing something with it, there would be tools available to all to rent out or use, what’s so wrong with that? In fact tool libraries already exist, as do worker owned co-ops.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Explain to those that don’t already understand, and then get the rest of the communists to agree that it doesn’t include private property used for work.