(i know this is an exchange between some of the worst people of the internet)
I seem to remember John Hurt giving birth to a chestburster on video so I call bullshit.
All we know from the aforementioned video is that John Hurt swallows, not spits.
It would also be funny if a furry pfp account replying to preggerU.
Some very very strong men checked very hard for a couple of hours, but nothing! It’s a mystery!
I’m sure they said “no homo” so everything’s fine.
Skill issue
Not with that attitude, they can’t.
It’s not for a lack of trying, that’s for sure
Why is shoeonhead a bad person?
complained about people unsympathetic to Cartoid Charlie
Hasn’t she’s been a figure on the “SWJs are ruining the world” side of youtube for almost a decade now?
yeah, she’s been always like this, not sure why people are surprised
Haha what, did she really??
“charlie kirk was just a dude”
Because shoes go on feet not heads. Blatant misinformation about the purpose and location of shoes.
as far as i remember she has no morals of her own - she only tried to appease those that give her views - maybe i’m wrong
Partly because of legitimately bad takes on some stuff but mostly because kids these days don’t have the mental flexibility for 2006 4chan humor.
I think I used to think that. Like, I get the edgy 4chaner-esque thing. There’s a bit of selfaware irony in it all that can work…
But for Shoe, after the Kirk thing, when she rushed to play defense, I think the whole mask dropped. Which, kind of makes sense. I don’t think you can do 2010 anti-sjw content for 15 years and not ACTUALLY be a bit of a winger. If you haven’t grown in that time, and you’re still stuck making that same content… that’s just who you are.
Look at her contemporaries and people after her. AmazingAtheist/TJ/IntoTheFray was one of the OG anti-feminist/sjw creators. He’s still a bit of an edgelord, but even he’s grown past that content and matured in thought.
And you can look at her peers in the space who sort of occupy the same niche. People like Vaush. Bit edgy, bit hot-take. But still has pretty consistent lefty values.
For Shoe, her act stopped being an act. The jokes just became what she is. She wasn’t being critical anymore of lefty extemists, she was just becoming a winger. And her defense of Kirk proved it.
Oh fuck off, just because ypu can’t be a fucking bigot openly as easily without being called on it doesnt show a lack of mental flexibility on their part. Fuck off back to 4chan if you can’t handle people being called out for being shitty humans.
Preach
2006 4chan humor.
On that topic… Has she posted tits? Because there’s only one other option.
Given that there no girls on the internet i doubt it.
Fake and gay.
Honestly, it was kind of nice to know that any kind of attention seeking was met with abject vitriol. I miss when the internet was anonymous and people understood that if you identify yourself on the internet, you where fair game.
“2006 4chan humor”? saying slurs and posting pedo bears? because that’s all I remember from that time
well that and this:
Peak
Moreso a means of communicating where everything is tongue in cheek and generally accepted as fake. It wasn’t perfect, don’t want a lot of it back, especially not the parts that eventually incubated fascists, but that’s her humor, and i understand it.
She’s problematic in oh so many other ways. I’m not suggesting she’s a protagonist here lol
The whole “lol it’s just a joke” thing has been a key tool used to normalize fascism in the US. It’s a blatant tactic used by the right to normalize truly horrifying things.
And unfortunately, it has been wildly successful
mental flexibility
Lol ok bud
h-how did u check
PragerU went around asking “U Prager?”
How is babby formed? How girl get pragnant
I don’t get the impression that there the type to ask.
Keep trying, with the power of God, everything is possible!
Clearly they have never seen the movie Junior (1994), starring Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Dennis Pregger 🤨📸
Penis Preggers*
I want to read the studies that look into this.
Femboys are jus so dang cute
👉👈
UwU?
Grok, is this true?
Are you deadnaming mecha Hitler?
Grok, draw a rendition of this, but without furries this time.
Great now you just have Loss.
Ok Grok, I’ll compromise - add sonic-chu
How do they even define “man?” People with xy chromosomes have given birth before.
I’m interested to read about this, please link to some more information.
Edit: found some, it’s not hard to search online for it.
pretty bold of you to assume PragerU would use the therm “cis” in this context.
We have made the same mistake over and over again when dealing with conservatives, which is the assumption that they give a micron of a shit about definitions and facts.
They are not living in a fact-based world, and we resent them for that because they are benefitting from the science, facts and reason that has build the world they cherish.
But we can make far more effective arguments if we meet them on an emotional level in these debates. I’ve seen more progress made in debates by progressives asking them what they would do if their own son or daughter was gay or trans than all the graphs and statistics in the world.
Or at the very least, call them heartless, weird, child-hating, freedom-hating, etc.
I don’t disagree, just pointing out - engaging them on an emotional level (in a different way) is exactly what happened in OP.
And a lot of transmen have also, even after being on hormone treatment for a while, thus looking just like cismen at a glance. Put them in women’s toilets, hmm, no?? What’s the problem, I thought only genetics mattered?? Like the very important genes that dictate that only women can wear dresses???
Hmm, if only there was the possibility of no strict binaries actually existing considering biological sex and social expressions of gender varying wildly even between cultures, but alas!
WHAT IS A WOMAN! /s
I know you are /s but I will respond /srs.
The fact that people in support of trans rights often can’t give a satisfying definition of “woman” is certainly not very problematic or even important at all, but it’s a big sticking point for conservatives and it would be nice to have a real answer.I haven’t tried this on real people yet, but I think that you can use a simple comparison to show that they also can’t simply define identity words. For example, they probably can’t come up with a simple definition of “father” that includes/excludes all the right people. Pester them on this point. Is a sperm donor a father? Is a man who adopts children a father? Is any male caretaker a father? Is a father-in-law a father? Is a step-father a father? Is an absent father a father?
If they end up with a very complicated & unintuitive flowchart definition, ask them: when someone says “as a father, this concerns me” or “I’m not a good father”, what do they actually mean? Are they referring to your definition? or to a vaguely-defined identity that’s really based in feelings and values?
This really easily transitions into talking about gender because then you can ask them to explain what people mean when they say “man up” or “be a man”. Nobody says those things to mean “be a penised adult human”, it’s obviously about feelings and values.The real strength of the “what is a woman” argument is that theres no answer that puts you ahead. If you draw a line, you get absolutely creamed for being some bigoted transphobe, if you take an open stance now you’re against women. If you say you can have your cake and eat it too you’re ridiculed for the inconsistency.
What is a man?
…
(Inb4 “a miserable pile of secrets” :p)
That’s a geek about to do his job.
That’s Diogenes trolling Plato. So technically a Greek about to do his job.
thx for the inb4 :D legendary line
