• Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh hey look. The story of how Rudy Giuliani found his wife!

    Edit: ex wife, sorry forgot the church didn’t condone their boning like they wanted so they had to get a divorce.

  • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Second cousins you don’t share even blood

    Comment:

    Second cousin in my country is a cousin from the part not related to any of my parents of one of my cousins. What is weird of that?

    For example, my cousin is one of my father’s brother son, then my second cousin has to be (otherwise would be a cousin too) the daughter of the cousin’s mother’s brother.

    If I pick a random girl I would be equally related genetically.

        • LostXOR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          People like you are why vampires are almost extinct. Be considerate and share a little.

      • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Dude second cousin in my country is a cousin from the part not related to any of my parents of one of my cousins. What is weird of that?

        For example, my cousin is one of my father’s brother son, then my second cousin has to be (otherwise would be a cousin too) the daughter of the cousin’s mother’s brother.

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Earliest common ancestor is great-grandparent. With same number intermediaries for both people.

            n^th cousin is how many “g’s” in the title of the earliest common ancestor. Grandparent == one “g” = first cousin. Two gs, second cousin, etc.

            “Removed” is the offset value, or the difference between how many intermediaries between the two parties and their earliest common ancestor.

    • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      In the country this post was most likely typed, your second cousin is the cousin of your mom or dad. That’s what’s weird of that

  • Bob@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    That happened to a few of my cousins years ago. We were at a family function so I thought they would’ve put two and two together, but alas.

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Second cousins hardly matters. Even 1st cousins only increase the chance of anomaly by 3%. 2nd cousins is background noise. If you make each other happy, go for it and let anyone who complains enjoy their divorces.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Edit. I understand now, thanks.


    What is a second cousin? Your cousins cousin? The person your aunt/uncle marrieds niece/nephew? That can’t be right, that’s not blood. Help! Lol

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      What is a second cousin?

      Someone with whom your most recent common ancestor is a great grandparent to both of you.

      Like how a first cousin is someone with whom your most recent common ancestor is a grandparent to both of you (aka you both have a same grandparent but not a same parent - meaning one of each of your parents are siblings with each other).

      If the most recent common ancestor isn’t the same relation for both of you, then there’s probably a “times removed” or one of you is some variety of aunt/uncle to the other.

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      My aunt’s kid is my cousin. My cousin’s kid and my kid are second cousins.

      It’s essentially finding the most recent common ancestor. My cousins and I share grandparents. Second cousins share great-grandparents, and so on.

      “Once removed” and such refers to generational differences. So, my first cousin’s kid is my first cousin once removed, and my kid’s second cousin.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Isn’t there some sort of biological thing where you’re more likely to be sexually attracted to your relatives if you don’t know they’re you’re relatives

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah, that’s weird: genetically similiar people are more attractive (as long as it isn’t too similiar)(people in stable relationships often look alike) but bigger genetical difference is better.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      All I could find on this is something called “genetic sexual attraction” [1], though Wikipedia contains arguments that it’s pseudoscience [1.1]. Here’s a Reddit post asking about this. [3].

      Related to this, I also came across the “Westermarck effect” [2] which appears to suggest that people who grow up together are less likely to be romantically attracted to each other [2.1].

      References
      1. “Genetic sexual attraction”. Wikipedia. Published: 2024-10-14T18:46Z. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:29Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_sexual_attraction.
        1. §“Criticism”

          Critics of the hypothesis have called it pseudoscience. In a Salon piece, Amanda Marcotte called the concept “half-baked pseudoscientific nonsense that people dreamed up to justify continuing unhealthy, abusive relationships”.[8] The use of “GSA” as an initialism has also been criticized, since it gives the notion that the phenomenon is an actual diagnosable “condition”.

          Many have noted the lack of research on the subject. While acknowledging the “phenomenon of genetic sexual attraction”, Eric Anderson, a sociologist and sexologist, noted in a 2012 book that “[t]here is only one academic research article” on the subject, and he critiqued the paper for using “Freudian psycho-babble”.

      2. “Westermarck effect”. Wikipedia. Published: 2024-09-26T14:09Z. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:33Z. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect.
        1. The Westermarck effect […] is a psychological hypothesis that states that people tend not to be attracted to peers with whom they lived like siblings before the age of six.

      3. "How does nature prevent us from feeling sexually attracted to relatives who are objectively sexually attractive? ". Author: “Morgentau7” (u/Morgentau7). “r/TooAfraidToAsk”. Reddit. Published: 2024-09-25T17:50:08.227Z. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:34Z. https://www.reddit.com/r/TooAfraidToAsk/comments/1fpaold/how_does_nature_prevent_us_from_feeling_sexually/.
    • olosta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Second degree cousins is not that close though. If every generation has three children, that’s 27 persons. I thinks that for most of human history excluding second degree cousins from the acceptable partners pool would have been impossible. Communities were not that big.