• kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sure, you can disable a lot of features from the home page, but even the remaining bits push you toward Plex’s ecosystem with things like recommendations. And I’ve even seen people complaining about needing to re-disable promotional content after updates. It’s simply a shady business.

    If anyone would care to tell me where I’m being pushed towards Plex’s ecosystem I’d love to understand what the flying fuck he’s talkin about. The only thing I could find that could generously be called part of the Plex “ecosystem” are the social features. Does it give more “ads” if you have a free account or something? Also I’ve had a server for 15 years and I’ve never had to re-do my customization from an update.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      On mobile if you install Plex for the first time you’re always dumped on the stupid pointless recommended page.

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        The writer claims that plex drives people towards recommendations even after disabling the recommended tab, that’s the part I’m trying to figure out.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          You mean this part?

          “Sure, you can disable a lot of features from the home page, but even the remaining bits push you toward Plex’s ecosystem with things like recommendations. And I’ve even seen people complaining about needing to re-disable promotional content after updates. It’s simply a shady business”

          If so I’ve definitely experienced that where all of a sudden the damn tab is re-enabled by itself. And it’s not even “disabled” it’s just not the default selection anymore. I can still see it down there.

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I believe I experienced what they called “re-disable promotional content after an update.” Everything was reset and my media was hidden with only their streaming options available. Similarly setting up a new Chromecast it only had their streaming content and I had to hide their content and unhide mine.

      I seem to remember there being some weaselly link that would re-enable their content after it was disabled too.

      Generously, they’re providing more content and a way to support the development of the product through ads. But all the changes and the way they’re happening show me a picture of a company with changing priorities. So I tend to agree with the sentiment of the author.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ad supported content is their bread and butter. More users use it then run a server and they make more off of it.

        • neclimdul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not sure I’ve ever used it, but according to Wikipedia, ad videos started in 2019, live tv is 2020, and rentals in 2024. During that time it’s become more and more intrusive, now replacing your media entirely out of the box.

          That means for 10 of its 16 software purchases and software subscriptions where it’s bread and butter and has grown into different revenue streams. It’s still software, but now it’s Ad based revenue streams. Adding more and more fees. You might say it’s growing into the thing it was supposed to replace, corporate cable and streaming service.

    • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s more on you than Plex, though, right? Like do you get mad at Walmart or Home Depot because you bought a tool you never use, or don’t use as frequently as you thought you would?

      Not defending Plex, I’m just curious.

      EDIT: I realize your post referenced pounds as currency, but I don’t know the equivalent stores on that side of the pond. Been 20 years since I was in London! Apologies.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Is there a specific reason you never used it? Plex isn’t great with their enshitification, but once you have a Plex pass, that’s the complete expenditure. I disabled all of the “free” and other streaming suggestions from my Plex environment.

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can turn it around nowadays on something like Craigslist or FB marketplace. It will easily sell for 150 quid. Some of the plex shares will be happy to take it off you because their accounts get constantly nuked.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agreed! I stayed with Plex for a long time because Jellyfin had a rough time with live TV (antenna) and I already had a PlexPass because of a sale a long time ago. Now Plex is only still running because I love Plexamp.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Does jellyfin have an easy way for remote streaming? I have a couple dozen people on my Plex server, most not very tech savvy, so setting up tailscale and running remote that way isn’t an option. I have a Plex pass so I haven’t been screwed by Plex yet, so I’m not rushing to get out, but I could see myself running both.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I set mine up with HAProxy for TLS offloading and ACME for the server cert. Restrict your access to just your country/region by GeoIP and you are pretty good to go.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Bummer… unfortunately, that’s a deal breaker for me to completely drop Plex. Maybe someday.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Tailscale. You don’t even need it on the client device, you can get a gl.inet travel router that’ll do the work.

                • GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Could you explain then instead of just posting a snarky comment that contributes nothing to the conversation?

              • jumjummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                I swear every single Plex related thread has the same Jellyfin fanatics coming in. Same energy as “my MIL has trouble with her computer” “just install Linux bro!” comments.

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Still better than the army of Plex fanboys that all claim to have dozens of senior citizens streaming from their Plex server.

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Tailscale is woefully impractical, as is setting up travel routers. You’re adding so much unnecessary complexity that has the chance to fail and frustrate them even more. Doubly so for anyone an appreciable distance from you (having tried this before, it’s just not worth it for me - about the 3rd time their tailscale client lost my network I was done with it). And not everyone wants to buy hardware to setup a remote streaming platform for blue hairs, because that also adds to the administrative complexity of the setup.

              But feel free to continue your childish tantrum about how people don’t understand why your genius ideas are really super great.

            • three@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Holy… you’ve been BTFO in the arena of intelligence I’m afraid…

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          So I don’t get it, I have mine up with a domain without tsilscale… The clients are quite happy wherever. I don’t even see that much “crawling” traffic that goes to the domain, most just hit the server by ip and get a static 401 page that the “default” site is hard coded to give out.

          • astro@leminal.spacedeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            At some point, somewhere on the internet, someone authoritatively claimed that tailscale is the one and only acceptable solution to getting your jellyfin server outside your LAN and it just kind of took root. nginx has worked perfectly fine for me.

            • Taldan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m so confused why so many people think a VPN is the best solution. It’s easy to implement, but hardly optimal, and certainly not the only solution

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes-ish, it’s harder for you than the users. But you will have to secure a URL and they will have to remember that URL. Also there’s some security issues with some unsecured endpoints on Jellyfin. That said I have mine out there exposed to the net and am comfortable enough with it.

        • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I already have to expose my Plex Media Server with a Tailscsle funnel (for IPv4 only) for IPv6 I use my Synology NAS reverse proxy which can be accessed globally.

          I have been maining this setup for years now that I forgot if I can access my PMS outside without either those solutions lol (I am GGNATED but IPv6 works fine as stated).

          The main thing here is that I don’t need my users to do anything, they just open the app and access it, no need to remember IPs/URLs or install VPNs to my server… Is that possible with Jellyfin as well?

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            No, there’s not centralized host server to connect your users with your server. They need a fixed IP or URL to access your server from outside your network.

              • Scrollone@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Jellyfin apps ask you for three things in order to login: URL, username, password.

                • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Thanks, that clears everything up for me…

                  Now if you could set that URL from the server itself and not the client apps… Certainly I don’t think that’s an impossible task.

          • Xanvial@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes you can do the same thing for Jellyfin. I use Synology ddns and setup subdomain in reverse proxy to jellyfin port. For tailscale, I previously use this but needs to add the jellyfin port after the tailscale IP.

        • Gonzako@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I have mine behind a caddy reverse proxy that forces https. I think that handles most sniffing concerns

      • priapus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You could just get a domain and set up a reverse proxy. Or use Cloudflare tunnels.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          All possible, but currently I have lifetime Plex pass and just need to share with people I want to share with. No extra config. Once Jellyfin can do that or something similar, I’ll look at jumping ship. Until then, the juice isn’t worth the squeeze.

          • priapus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Fair enough. I doubt Jellyfin will ever offer something like that. Its designed to be completely self hosted and not rely on a central server, which I dont see changing.

          • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Once Jellyfin can do that or something similar

            Once Jellyfin does that then it’ll be time to look at jumping ship to something else, because that’ll be the indication that Jellyfin is going down the same road as Plex.

        • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          The first one, yes. That’s what I do. But IIRC hosting media via cloudflare tunnels goes against the TOC and they reserve the right to ban users over it

          • madnerds@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            They changed their TOC a while ago, the only thing they have in there now is boiler plate stuff about not hosting pirated content.

            https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/terms/ You agree not to, and not to allow third parties to use the Services to ... post, transmit, store or link to any files, materials, data, text, audio, video, images or other content that infringe on any person’s intellectual property rights or that are otherwise unlawful;

            I just set up a cache rule to ignore my jellyfin subdomain and they won’t ever care about me and my half dozen users.

      • oakey66@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I moved away from plex as well. I do have remote access but had to set up Tailscale on the accounts that access it. It’s a bit of a hassle initially but works well.

    • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just to think of replacing the mount points in the docker container from Plex to Jellyfin (in order for it to read my Riven and Decypharr symlinks) scares me… Mostly because after I finish a docker project my mind seems to go blank lol.

      At least they still kinda honour the Plex Pass lifetime users…

    • Foni@chachara.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The way you switch between two servers you own is more than inconvenient; it’s what keeps Plex in my life.I wish things would change because everything else is better.

      • naticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s why I use Emby. Paid for lifetime within a day of switch from Plex (which I also have has lifetime for like a decade) because it has a ton of plugins that have been useful and has a cloud server switch function.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d love Jellyfin if not for their incredibly infuriating seek behaviour. Why do I have to press play to start the video again?

      • binarytobis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        For me I just want a fast forward button. They have something they call fast forward, but it seeks instead.

      • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        In case this helps, for me when I use it on Android TV with said TV’s remote, the arrow buttons on the direction pad for anything require pressing play/OK button after. But if I use the fast forward buttons, it does seek and then just keeps playing.

    • dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      For the love, as a Plex alternative, they don’t even have a native app on all major tv stores. It should be a P1 feature. I would throw money at them if they get Apple TV support. Right now, there are no functional apps running on the latest Apple TV OS.

          • priapus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh weird. I would guess a transcoding issue, maybe double check those settings to make sure you have the right config for your hardware.

            Theres also Infuse, its a video player that supports jellyfin, but I think some features are behind a premium purchase.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        For the love, as a Plex alternative, they don’t even have a native app on all major tv stores. It should be a P1 feature.

        Are you really bitching this hard about a completely free and open source project?

        It’s not technology or finances that kill most FOSS projects and burn out the devs. It’s this kind of shitty entitled unappreciative demanding attitude from users.

        As others have pointed out, there are fully functional and good quality frontends available, such as Swiftfin.

        • dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I maintain open source projects too, and I fully understand the burnout, the pressure from supporters and such. What I was saying is they can do better from a project management perspective. Otherwise I love their work :3

          Swiftfin is buggy atm, like my other comment.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    The writing was on the wall when they started getting American VC money.

    American VC culture is anthenema to truly user focused products.

  • Doorknob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    If they were going to get enshittified, they should’ve been smarter about it to gradually introduce lock-in. The switching cost of going to Jellyfin is almost zero. Did it in an afternoon about a year ago. Ya done goofed, Plex

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Xbmc was renamed Kodi and it’s still revenant. It has a totally different use case than Plex or jellyfin and there’s plugins for both.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I hate headlines like this. I’d love to hear the REASONS WHY Plex are doing all of this. But no, it’s just “4 ways in which Plex now sucks” which we all know already.

    Before someone says “the reason is money” we need to ask: do the developers of Jellyfin not use money? Why won’t the same thing just happen to them too?

    Before someone says “enshittification,” we need to ask: does this mean Jellyfin will soon have the same problems?

    We all seem to love Jellyfin so I think we need to understand the actual reason why, or this will just continue happening.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Plex took a significant degree of other people’s money, to the tune of over 40 million dollars. The people who gave said money were not kickstarter funders, donators, subscribers, etc but investors, who have an expectation that plex will move the company in a direction that makes them profitable enough to not only repay the 40+ million investment, but to then earn profits for a lengthy period (possibly in perpetuity) as they are stakeholders. This is the same thing that happened to Reddit (though Reddits scale and timeline was FAR more vast), openai, Google, literally every company ever basically. Plex now has an obligation to not just continue development but to continue it in a way that maximizes growth and revenue, even if that is anti consumer.

      Jellyfin on the other hand has language on their contributions page that almost discourages financial support. This is because the only financial support they accept is donations, which are clearly explained are to support the free software and give no ownership stake. The software does not generate profit and donation does not equate to any kind of investment, other than supporting continued development. Expecting any kind of return on your part (again, other than the project continuing to move forward) is foolish. Lemmy is similar, as are many other FOSS projects. Jellyfin can remain ideologically stable to its goals, and because it is free if its users feel the lead developers are straying from this they can fork it and make “new ideologically pure jellyfin” (see xmbc to plex to emby to jellyfin, or lemmys 938 forks, many of which are tweaks and some of which are because people got beef with the main devs)

      • Bearlydave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Further to this, I heard Cory Doctorow talk about open source licensing being a Ulysses Pact. Basically Ulysses wanted to hear the sirens song. Normally, hearing it would drive you mad and you would wreck upon the rocks. Ulysses ordered his men to bind their ears with wax so they would not be affected by the sirens song. He also ordered them to tie him to the mast.

        In the moment, he knew he would not be strong enough to resist the sirens song and because he was bound to the mast, he could not jump overboard. In the same way, people that use open source licenses on their projects are binding themselves to the open source license so that if a large temptation was to present itself (such as investors wanting to give them life changing money in exchange for mistreating their customers) they are already bound by that license and cannot break that bond.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Or they’ll do what plex did. Reminder that plex started life as a fork of xbmc/kodi for macos. When their fork showed some popularity they shifted development to various names (plex home theater). While this still contained a lot of GPL code they then spent a good deal of dev time rewriting said code to be fully closed source.

          This is less discussed but also why plex is one of the most insidious and disgusting pieces of unethical software one can use. The writing is on the wall and the company is led by scumbags, sure, but people don’t talk as much about how they forked xbmc, built a huge product based on everything learned from it, and then closed everything off once they did the minimum required cover your ass moves.

          What they did is legal but is it ethical? If they did it to a company like apple or Microsoft they’d get sued, that’s for damn sure. And ethically speaking I would say it’s really fucked to take all this stuff from the community: architecture, ideas, ui/ux, approaches to plugin design, data modeling, etc and build a whole company off of it, then basically give nothing back. They closed it off so they could get their bag, fuck the community that taught them so much and helped build their MVP.

          What you describe is similar to the creation of jellyfin from emby though; where embys dev team suddenly decided to close source the GPL server code (a violation) and add monetization. the community rejected this, and forked the last version prior to the nonsense into what is now jellyfin.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hate headlines like this. I’d love to hear the REASONS WHY Plex are doing all of this.

      1. Greed… do you really need 3 more?

      Before someone says “the reason is money” we need to ask: do the developers of Jellyfin not use money? Why won’t the same thing just happen to them too?

      Plex is a private company wanting money… Jellyfin is a voluteer-drive effort

      Before someone says “enshittification,” we need to ask: does this mean Jellyfin will soon have the same problems?

      Enshitification happens to privately develop products due to <checks notes> greed… Jellyfin is not a private company pushing a product for profit

      We all seem to love Jellyfin so I think we need to understand the actual reason why, or this will just continue happening.

      Back to “greed”

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        As predicted, a one-dimensional answer.

        Let’s say they want more money: they do have a healthy software subscriptions business. How can they get more by becoming the world’s tiniest streaming service? And won’t that cannibalize their subscriptions business as the experience gets shittier and shittier?

        Some actual “whys” within this would be things like (made up, but for example)

        1. the subscriptions business is dying - less than 1% of users ever buy a pass and efforts to increase that failed for (another reason here)

        2. streaming services are dumping cash into viewer acquisition because a war is on for dominance in that space and Pled is capitalizing on that

        3. Plex has high overlap with gamers and are making good money on midroll gaming ads during these streams

        4. Plex has legal concerns about facilitating piracy - this is the real reason why sync is shit and they killed watch together. They are desperately trying to pivot out of their old business before they get sued - OR all this streaming nonsense gives them a kind of fig leaf over that somehow

        See, issues can be complex and interesting. Just calling them greedy is neither. How is this the greedy play, even?

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Nobody outside Plex’s finance department is going to have what you’re looking for if those examples are anything to go by.

          What it comes down to is they have $130M that investors are going to want back and all the decisions they’re making now are aimed at doing so. That doesn’t mean any of those decisions are good or are going to work. It didn’t even mean they won’t backfire and have the opposite effect.

      • That Weird Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        plus jellyfin is open source. if they start enshittifying, people can just fork it. That will keep them in line. Look what happened with emby. They’ve been sent to oblivion and no one even talks about them anymore.

  • EonNShadow@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use Plex for audiobooks and TV shows primarily.

    The fact that you can’t (or at least can’t easily) scan library files from Plexamp is utterly insane to me. Especially after they made audio libraries completely unavailable on the regular Plex app.

    I’ll probably switch to Audiobookshelf or something else down the line.

    • Thoven@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      +1 for audiobookshelf, after using tools like Plex for a long time I was honestly shocked by how much more user friendly it felt. And it’s a one man team! The only significant demerit is that the IOS app is stuck in test flight limbo, so you have to find another player. Though most do that already I think.