Will it be effective?

Spoiler

No, it was not very effective.


EDIT: The banning event continues. Please consult the modlog to observe.

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&modId=7121342

If you scroll down to about a day ago, you might be able to observe an emerging behavior from this mod.


EDIT 2: The mod in question moderates a total of 108 Lemmy communities. How deep does this conspiracy run? Is this mod a lost Redditor? More to come!


EDIT 3: The mod has now removed my comment all together, one might assume because it was still receiving upvotes in the 2 hours following my ban. Are there similarities here to Watergate? You be the judge!


EDIT 4: The mod in question has now been removed as a mod of the !vegan@lemmy.world community, as a result of their abuse of power.

https://lemmy.world/post/19731457

This was their response:


EDIT 5: This will be my final update, since as far as I see it, the issue this thread focuses on has been resolved. To quote Beaver herself in a very ironic comment she made directed towards someone else:

Clearly this was all just a case of…

  • Resonosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s “vegans” like this that make the entire movement look bad. They need to be removed as a mod. The movement needs to be honest by letting free and equal exchange of ideas and viewpoints

    • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m interested and I’m cutting down on animal sourced food, but they are aggressive, ignorant and overall annoying, so I blocked them some days ago. I’m not sure what their goal is. Gatekeeping veganism so that nobody considers it?

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not sure if you saw the recent community update, but things have died down at /c/vegan. Up to you, but posts will probably be leaning more informative and less antagonistic now that the situation has been resolved.

      • Spacenut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        There are plenty of other spaces where vegans can respond to “plants feel pain” and “but what about lions” a million times a day, but that gets old pretty quick. The goal is to have a space where vegans can just interact amongst themselves, which necessarily requires some degree of gatekeeping

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Then shouldn’t their space be private, so they don’t show up on all? They are begging for downvotes with how nasty their memes are. I understand their point, but i am sure that my understanding is much better reserved for non jerks.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t know, don’t have an instance. If it’s not just an option to still be federated but to opt out of having community posts being featured in all then maybe they should defederate with all of the other ones so they can post terrible things about the people they hate behind everyone else’s backs. Or they can just accept that when someone (even a mod) posts something antagonistic, it’s going to get down votes.

              I seriously doubt that vegan posts showing off durian jerky, or even posts about how long cows could live if the meat industry didn’t slaughter them at peak profit efficiency, would be downvoted that much.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s an echo bunker. Banning anyone who doesn’t whole throatedly support their beliefs is a feature of the community, not a bug. I am banned.

  • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Mods 108 communities?

    What we have here, sir and/or madam, is a Reddit mod. Excessive modding, a smell you can’t quite place, same techniques.

    Gotta say: I was hoping we wouldn’t be followed by that type.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Pretty sure the Reddit mods were the biggest group of complainers against Reddits API changes, since they used third party apps in order to mod.

      So it stands to reason a ginormous group of them switched to Lemmy and had plenty of free time to mod there as well.

    • Angry_Autist@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is inevitable, all lemmy instances will eventually be taken over by supermods that leverage their power to harass.

      This vegan fiasco isn’t even the first time but I guarantee you the admins will leave them to powermod the remaining 107 as they see fit.

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I guarantee you the admins will leave them to powermod the remaining 107 as they see fit.

        Well, in this case the person in question couldn’t handle the fallout of their actions, and actually deleted their whole account.

        • Angry_Autist@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Powermods like that don’t usually have only one account, and since they can mod themselves wherever they go, they usually do.

          Nuking an account is just changing skins. The admins have the power to track and fix that, but they won’t.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Now I’m wondering if all the other drama surrounding her was actually her fault…

    Good job assassinating your own character, I guess, Beavs.

  • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ah, this explains it! Saw I was banned from a community that I’d never posted in and evidently one of the mods is a wanker. Mystery solved :)

  • Katzastrophe@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    At this point we should turn Rule 5 into it’s own joke. Bad vibes? Rule 5. I don’t like you? Rule 5. I’m having a bad day? Rule 5. The great servers need a sacrifice? Rule 5. Bitching about Rule 5? Believe it or not, Rule 5.

  • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Random, but related, question. How do you pull up these lists? I’ve been banned from a community, but have no idea why

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      On voyager the modlog for you is in the upper right of the account screen. But the website version is much more extensive.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I got banned for saying I didn’t think the meme was funny.

    I legitimately do not care about that, but I do care deeply about how funny Beaver’s tantrum is, so I hope she keeps it up.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s funny that she thinks she’s accomplishing anything here but all that’s happening is that she’s eroding her own credibility, especially with those angry memes targeting people who aren’t Vegans and her beef with the Lemmy.world admins.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Incidentally, vegan Spam does exist both in the official Spam brand and in another brand called unMeat. As someone who really doesn’t like Spam, though, I’m unqualified to judge it.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    But I was assured this only happened on ml instances and .world was a blistering Wild West of ultimate free speech 🤔

    (As long as you don’t dislike Nazis, thats what got me banned from the instance)

  • YarrMatey(she/her) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Am I missing something here? The vegan community is for vegans and people to ask questions about being vegan but is not for debating about any part of being vegan. That is their rule 5, which I see people break every day thinking it is ok to shit all over vegans there. If you don’t want to hear about vegans then block the community.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The mod isn’t banning people for debating in the comments. A lot of people the mod is banning (myself included) are people who only downvoted posts. Considering that a large portion of the posts are blatantly antagonist things like this, it easy to see why they’re getting downvoted. If you’re going to insult 90% of the users on an instance, then you’re going to get downvoted.

      The mod could have made the community private so they could insult people without consequences, but instead, they decided to remain public while banning anyone who downvotes their insults. They want to continue to antagonize the instance while removing the instance’a ability to respond. They want to artificially lower the number of downvotes they get, so it doesn’t look like their antagonistic bullshit is as unpopular as it is.

      Everyone could block the community, and if you choose to do that, that’s a reasonable response, but it shouldn’t be the only response. We should be able to express our opinion about the content in our feeds, even if it’s just downvoting it. Why should an entire instance be expected to hide from one abusive community?

    • Zess@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you don’t want to hear about vegans then block the community.

      Doesn’t help much when one of their users is being so fucking stupid that news of it spreads across all of Lemmy.

      • YarrMatey(she/her) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Well yeah if seeing vegan content upsets you enough to break their rule 5 then it is not a good community for you. And that is ok, honestly I get grief in real life about me trying to be vegan. Having a place amongst other vegans and people not anti-vegan is nice. I also don’t know the context behind the post so if there is something I’m missing feel free to tell me.

        • Albbi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I got banned (rule 5) for downvoting a meme with misleading information. I’m not vegan, but I like the idea in general so I did enjoy seeing content. But things have gone off the rails recently.

        • Fwiw, anyone giving you grief irl is a jerk, unless you’re trying to convert them.

          Away from the internet, I know a good handful of vegans that I gladly cook for. Not regions everyone hates y’all for living your beliefs.

          And, just for full disclosure, I troll vegans online. That’s where most of the jerks that are vegan do their thing, not irl.

          Me and you, if life threw us together, I’d make you my vegan chili, and we’d chill. But I’d still troll you online if you did the usual online stuff that gets vegans painted as crazy.

          Which is my best effort at saying that that’s probably what you’re missing. Even people like me that have no problems with the precepts of veganism per se, we can get tired of the vegans that take things too far, and then the entire belief system gets colored by that brush. It creates a general fatigue, then a general stereotype, and that turns into assholes going to vegan spaces and being assholes (as opposed to only doing it in other spaces). That in turn makes militant vegans go on the warpath, and you get stuff like this drama lol

          It’s a cycle of annoyance and limited perception. That cycle attracts the worst elements of humanity

          • YarrMatey(she/her) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Thank you for posting this. I know now that it was because of voting which is ehh not as bad as I thought. But yeah IRL my family and partner aren’t very supportive, I’ve been trying to ignore their comments. It’s just hard sometimes, like just last night my partner said they felt sorry for me during dinner because I didn’t have meat in my meal. I think that’s probably why some vegans become more aggressive online as well as the cycle going on. Idk I just like reading articles and seeing recipes. When I first went vegan my dad tried getting my whole family to convince me to eat meat again. I love my dad but that sucked. I also love my partner and they are otherwise fine, but they seem to have a problem and are adjusting to my new diet. I can understand the fatigue a vegan may go through, but banning people for voting isn’t exactly what I had in mind as their rule 5.

            • Resonosity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m sorry you went through that. It shapes us to have thicker skin, but it can also lead to bad outcomes depending on the friends and family involved.

              Ed Winters talked about this on his channel recently. One of the biggest reasons people don’t go vegan, and one of the biggest reasons pushing people away from the movement is the social dimension: living with people and still holding them as on your side when they very clearly violate your moral code. It’s one of the hardest burdens of vegans, as I’m sure it can be for other minorities. Again, I’m not equating vegans to a minority group like LGBTQ or POC. The animals are the minority group. But when you have discrimination and sometimes segregation for specific groups in society, you can start to draw parallels.

              Good luck with your vegan life from a fellow vegan 🤙

            • I’m sorry you’re running into such a degree of outright opposition. I never have understood that part, why someone that loves you would be persistent and nigh aggressive about something that’s essentially not their business.

              Somebody wants to make a change, move towards something they feel is better, you support that, even if you need to draw your own boundaries about it.

              That would be exhausting to deal with for anyone, the opposition.

              I kinda get where the mod is at, the way you describe the fatigue. I think it’s better to step aside once your at that point, refresh yourself, maybe make a decision about that being a permanent break from trying to herd cats online or not. I’ve had to do the a few times over the years.

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I personally believe this particular mod may be abusing the community’s rule 5, stretching it to suit their agenda. But I’ll leave the interpretation up to you.

          Note that others are reporting being banned by simply downvoting community posts. Suggesting further overreach.

          • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Users cannot vote in a community that has banned them. If the mod wants to restrict voting only to people who vote in good faith, that’s their prerogative. It’s probably a good idea, it prevents downvote spam from bots and the like. When you have a community that has very different values from /all, maybe kicking the /all people who vote against the sub’s values out is good. Voting is participation.

            • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Shining transparency on these values and modding decisions to the attention of the fediverse then serves the greater good.

            • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’ll be one to admit my own comment was a bit cheeky. I had honestly never really noticed the !vegan@lemmy.world in my All feed until today, when this particular mod started posting a great deal of really poorly formatted memes. My cheeky comment was my only ever comment in the community.

              I can’t speak to any actual brigading, as the community normally isn’t worth my time, which is very, very important to me.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think what you are missing is that they’re banning people for breaking Rule 5 that haven’t broken Rule 5.

      Nobody is taking issue with them banning people that broke Rule 5.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      but is not for debating about any part of being vegan

      If that’s the case, I want to know why perfectly innocuous comments are still removed. Seems like they operate on a whim.

      • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Cause over the last few weeks, a bunch of debates over moderation drama have been full of people attacking vegans over the cat taurine debate. That drama is over and it reached a consensus resolution between the mods and admins. If they’ve made an executive judgement that the moderation drama is no longer relevant and baits carnists into breaking rule 5, then removing that debate is a valid application of rule 5.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Odd then that they’re using Rule 5 bans on people like me who never posted to their community

      • YarrMatey(she/her) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Depends on the context maybe? Idk I am not a mod. I’ve just seen comments about arguing for eating meat or saying something like “I’m going to eat 2 hamburgers now because of you” which are just annoying. I thought that was what this was about. I’ll leave my comments up for anyone else confused.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      If they indeed promoted vegan diets for carnivores then I’m for a ban of the mod / community too. That’s very much animal abuse.

    • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The problem is, in my opinion, that they post memes that are clerly provoking non-vegan people for discussion.

      It’s weird to jump under a “here are my 15 ways of cooking asparagus” post with anti-vegan content. But “look at these carnovorous clowns” memes are clearly offensive.

      • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think it’s intended to provoke non-vegan people, I think it’s meant to be a ‘for us, by us’ community. PSA to all: there’s a block community button for communities that are not hateful or illegal (you should report those) but are things you’d prefer not to see on your personalized feeds

        • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s what private communities are for. Calling people names while perfectly aware of it leaking into the public feed is a provocation. And it worked.

          • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m not sure what you’re referring to re: name-calling tbh, and I think this thread is an overreaction, but I agree with you that non-private communities have some obligation to civility or something like that

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Which Hamid has made just as bad as beaver did here, but I guess at least he’s transparent about ban hammering and comment removals. He’s insufferable and is the instance mod, not just community mod.

        It is starting to look like the only place a vegan community mushroom can grow and flourish is on an even bigger pile of shit. It’s a little crass to say, but it ought to tell you something when the most defederated and blocked instances is where your group hangs out.

        I just want to read vegan recipes and see like minded people discuss a topic in a civilized way, you know, like basically every other community.