r/RetroGaming is very strict about retro. They say the Nintendo 64 is retro while the PlayStation 2 is modern. This despite the fact the PlayStation 2 is now 25 years old.

So I got to wonder about this community deems as “retro”.

Or a better question: what’s considered retro and not retro? What’s the fine line between retro and modern?

  • Majorllama@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Any console that existed before me is retro. I started with the PS1 and N64 so those are modern and all the ones before are retro lol

  • thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Back in the PS2/Xbox/Gamecube era the SNES and Megadrive seemed to be retro while the PS1 and N64 were just “old”. So maybe 2 generations ago is the start of retro.

    I think it’s definitely a lot blurrier now though. The differences between consoles and the leaps between generations are less pronounced, and there are so many y rereleases and remasters now keeping older games fresh.

    • Kelly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      10 years seems a bit short, that would mean Hearthstone, GTA5 and Sims 4 qualify.

      • Varyag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes that’s what I said. PS3 era games and at this point, early PS4 start yo qualify for me. Although still actively developed games aren’t “fully” retro, clearly. I’m still on the fence about calling Bloodbkrne retro, for instance.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It goes on vibes. Historically I’d have said anything with an 8- or 16-bit CPU (NES/SNES, Megadrive, the surfeit of home computers before everyone standardised on beige-box Windows PCs). Nowadays I’d say anything slow enough to be emulated reasonably using present-day technology could be said to be retro, so PS2 would count. If video output is analogue PAL/NTSC, that probably also counts.

  • ahornsirup@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    /r/retrogaming’s definition doesn’t work anymore now that there are multiple generations that grew up with video games. Just because it doesn’t feel retro to the 40 year old who remembers playing the PS2 as a teenager doesn’t mean it’s not retro. The PS2 is absolutely a retro console, and the PS3 is very much getting there.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    20 years is a good cutoff, in my opinion. That puts the original God of War in retro territory, and I’m ok with that. I’m also ok with vanilla WoW (up to patch 1.8 or so) being retro. These things are old, we’re getting old and pretending games from 2005 and before aren’t retro is just wishful thinking.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If it can be emulated on a potato it’s retro. If it’s it’s old but not trivial to emulate then it’s classic.

  • iagomago@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    To me, “retro” just means something that is now only possible for consumption through the previous, now impossible or highly impractical, acquisition of said medium. PS3? Retro. 3DS? Retro.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      This seems like a good line to draw. Does it play natively on current consoles? Not retro. If you have to use an emulator or pull out an older console then that’s retro.

  • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If I were in charge, retro would mean games from 5th generation and earlier.

    Modern game design hasn’t fundamentally evolved since the Xbox, PS2, and Dreamcast (Sixth gen) era. Pre 1998, 3D games were still figuring out how to take advantage of 3D, so they don’t quite reach the modern era, but almost all modern games can be traced back to sixth gen.

    Likewise, I would classify the early days of 2D the ancient era, which would be anything before the SNES and Sega Genesis (Fourth gen). The NES has classic games, but it wasn’t until the SNES that those games were perfected into their modern formulas.

    Microsoft, Sony, AMD, and NVIDIA are all betting big in AI so we might finally be entering a new distinct era soon. DLSS 4 is still blurry af, so we are for sure not there yet.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Retro is a style and astetic as much as a function of time or technology.

    Even mathematicians struggle with dividing things into precise and consistent sets and categories. Try to relax.