• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs – to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct, nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record. All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary.

    Orwell, 1984

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The important thing to remember is that it’s never the fault of the people in power. It’s always the gross, dumb, smelly voters who can’t pick the Lesser Of Two Evils often enough.

        It’s both. I’m not going to pretend that people voting against their own self interests isn’t a problem. If people actually voted in a way that would help them we’d have a lot more Dems than Republicans in the USA.

        It’s stupid to pretend we don’t live in a first past the post system where most voters are going to vote straight D or straight R. Voting 3rd party is just shredding your vote in almost all cases.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not going to pretend that people voting against their own self interests isn’t a problem

          The problem with “lesser evil” politics is that neither candidate represents your interests.

          You had a corporate Democrat running against a fascist Republican. This after four years of liberals breaking their campaign promises, fattening the wallets of Techbro AnCaps, and beating up civil rights protestors on national TV.

          It’s stupid to pretend we don’t live in a first past the post system where most voters are going to vote straight D or straight R.

          It’s stupid to close off your primary so an unpopular incumbent in a dementia spiral doesn’t have to campaign against another wave of progressive outsiders.

          When Henry Cuellar or Jim Justice or Kristen Sinema are the Ds on my ballot, it isn’t even FPTP. It’s a forgone conclusion I’m getting fucked from either side.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Three weeks after doomsday, yeah her campaign manager’s gonna say something nice. What is this supposed to show, anyway?

        Did they get caught giving away the dark secret that they did their best to run a successful campaign?

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Her primary problem was going for the left’s vote when the left doesn’t vote.

        The only way to fix it is to go further right and pick up the voters who are disillusioned by Trump in 2028.

    • WHARRGARBL@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      But Harris wouldn’t say the words I wanted hear! How could I vote when she won’t tell me the thing?!1 ThiS Is All HeR fAuLt

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        What do you mean Harris literally said “ceasefire?”

        She didn’t order the IDF to stand down though. So, fascism I guess.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Those weren’t progressives. Those were right-wing concern trolls cosplaying as leftists.

        • WHARRGARBL@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Honestly I’m so far left of left, I don’t belong here. But I didn’t fall for the obvious whataboutGaza campaign, and voted D to stop trump.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Aha! So you admit you love genocide and have no moral compass whatsoever!

            You’re an embarrassment to purity-test political nut-scratching! Can you just imagine, for ONE second what would have happened if Harris had won?? It’s too terrifying to contemplate!

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Depends on the reason for the arrest. If I get zip-tied and dragged off the streets for saying mean things about orange man, I won’t be the embarrassed one.

      • jof@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        No I certainly would agree with that. But being restrained against your will and having your records publicized about being an offender of the law certainly doesn’t bode well for your own public image or on employment applications.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They probably think the sobbing makes people scared. It makes the arrested look weaker, regretful and vulnerable.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      How? Cops are pieces of shit and arrest innocent people all the time.

      It’s embarrassing to be arresting someone.

      • jof@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Enforcing the law is embarrassing? Breaking the law is embarrassing.

        And my point isn’t that she was necessarily breaking the law. I’m simply stating that it’s already an embarrassing enough act to be restrained and then on top of that have images of you in a vulnerable state circulate around the internet.

        • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

          “The law” and the entire legal system of injustices behind it is embarrassing as fuck too. Same goes for those who simp for it.

          • jof@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m not saying it’s perfect. It has its share of flaws, but rules and law create order. I’m not a simp for US law, but without it, injustice would run even more rampant. If you claim to love justice then you must also, by principle, be in favor of some sort of law system that enforces it.

            • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Rules != the law. The legal frameworks are inherently flawed and globally protect the rich and powerful, while harming minorities.

              Yes societies need rules, those can be agreed upon by people living in the societies.

              • jof@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                What would you argue are the differences between rules and laws in society? I use the two interchangeably as I believe them to mean the same thing.

                • lumpenproletariat@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I would say

                  Laws are backed by states and their sole authority to use violence to enforce them.

                  Rules can be made by any group of peoples.

      • jof@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        The act of being arrested is not particularly fun. You know, being restrained and walked off like an animal in some sense. Depends what it’s for in general. But it’s the public image of it. And then the repercussions of having to deal with follow up court work, possible jail time and it being a future talking point of a potential employer. It’s just not really something to be proud of.

        That is a rule in general, with exceptions of course.

        But my point stands, that the act is embarrassing enough already, especially if it’s publicized. So having your face edited to make it look even more humiliating is worse.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          being arrested is not particularly fun.

          Being an inconvenience is not the same as embarrassing.

          having to deal with follow up court work

          Which is probably near zero has her case will likely be dismissed, but again she is a lawyer.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can sue Donald Trump without suing the US Government. Right now several lawmakers are preparing a lawsuit against Pam Bondi over the Epstein Files.

          If we flip the house and senate I’m gonna start sending drafts to representatives for a law that makes the Trump estate and all future president’s estates liable for all the avoidable and frivolous lawsuits on the basis of which they did not protect the human beings who live in this nation nor represent the system of laws which govern them, rather that they were personal and need to be paid for personally by the officials responsible for giving the orders resulting in lawsuit.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            You would have to show that Trump specifically ordered the alteration. That almost certainly didn’t happen and it was someone else in the administration that actually made that call.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    America won’t tolerate “attacks” in their churches yet seems to have no answer for and tolerates quite a lot of school shootings…

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Me, the other day: “They’ve finally done it. They’ve finally hit rock botto…wait, nope, I was wrong.”

    Me, yesterday: “They’ve finally done it. They’ve finally hit rock botto…wait, nope, I was wrong.”

    Me, this morning: “They’ve finally done it. They’ve finally hit rock botto…wait, nope, I was wrong.”

    Me, tomorrow: “They’ve finally done it. They’ve finally hit rock botto…wait, nope, I was wrong.”

    Etc, etc, and fucking, etc.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Trump has been doing that every day since 2016. Every day he says the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard, and every next day he keeps trumping [bazinga] himself.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Dystopian fiction: The regime alters photos to make people look happy and smiling, to hide their cruelty.

    Dystopian reality: The regime alters photos to make people look sad and pained, to brag about their cruelty.