• JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Google has the ability to stand up to trump. To destroy him, frankly.

    But they’d have to not be little bitches, so I guess they don’t.

    • FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      For me it’s extra strange. If I zoom out, I see “Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)”. However when I zoom in it changes to just “Guild of America”.

      I’m American also in the US.

      • andyspam@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you zoom in to 1m resolution and then slowly zoom out, you’ll see the name change back and forth several times. Very odd.

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You have to zoom in sooo much too for it to say Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America). Weird. Makes no sense why Google would do this except to schmooze up to Little-Hands Trump.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m trying to, but Proton made me throw up in my mouth a little.

    Now I have the option to do everything I was doing, but poorly AND spread across 3 vendors.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        CEO went full maga, was given an opportunity to correct, then doubled down. After receiving blowback he tripled down and then started lashing out at customers using official channels.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        True, works fine.

        Then they said they didn’t log IP’s then handed over one of their users IP’s that got an activist locked up.

        There there was the bootlicking incident (it’s a paywall but you get the gist before it disappears)

        https://theintercept.com/2025/01/28/proton-mail-andy-yen-trump-republicans/

        He praised Trump publically, not a great look, but whatever, then tried to say he was not being political, while being even more political. His PR department swooped in to Reddit and started posting straw man attacks. I don’t trust their CEO at this point. If it were any other just email company, I’d be down with it, but their whole schtick is security and privacy, and apparently, they’re led by an idiot.

        If I’m taking my shit out of google, I’m not taking to some place that’s positioned to be more of the same if I can help it, and they really appear to be more of the same.

          • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I think you absolutely should care about the political opinions of the CEO considering it’s a private company and the CEO most likely gets to dictate the political leaning of the company. It’s not like Twitter turned to shit simply because Musk bought it. It turned to shit because (among other things) Musk made business decisions based on his political opinions.

            You could argue you don’t need to care because their political opinions aren’t influencing their business right now, but don’t you think it might be a bit too late to care when the business starts to reflect the politics of the CEO? For example if tomorrow Trumps wants to know the contents of your email and the CEO decides to appease Trump you might start to care about the political h

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        CEO publicly praised Trump and the Republican party. It’s not the political alignment you’d want from the CEO of a service where privacy is their main selling-point.

  • Dingaling@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s not google’s fault. It was told to do so and has. Does anyone seriously expect them not to have done this?

    Every American company, or company doing business in America, needs to toe the line of an unpredictable and vindictive president, especially one as fat and tempting as Google.

    Now there’ll be a disconnect in mapping between what some sources say and what others do, but anyone with a little history knowledge knows this isn’t the first time.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The renaming only applies to US federal agencies. Google is (supposedly) not a federal agency, so yes, it is their fault.

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Google takes their place name data from the relevant country’s official government sources. That source data changed. This is exactly like when the previous administration renamed Mt McKinley to Denali.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          They don’t have to do that, especially when the change is clearly for white supremacy purposes (like Denali being given its colonial name back). It’s their choice to be bootlickers.

    • John@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is absolutely right. I work in the biz (not google) and we don’t decide what things are named. We just ingest sources. Very rarely do we make manual edits such as this. It’s not like we have a department sitting around deciding what all the bajillion things in a map are named. If the US decides that something is named something, that’s what we ingest.

      This is the exact nonsense that gets people all worked up and fighting and wasting their energy, while we have oligarchs planning our demise.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not in the USA, I am not a US citizen. No reason I should be seeing this while I’m in the EU.

      • eatyourglory@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Look at the Falkland Islands. It does the exact same thing because the Argentinian government ordered them to. Google maps tries to stay apolitical, by abiding governments, and adding the non-globally recognised name in brackets.

          • smeenz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of place names that are not internationally recognised around the world.

      • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        look, fuck google for many reasons, but not this. this is just keeping your head down and trying to survive the shit storm.

          • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            sure. whatever. fuck google. i’m definitely not here to defend google.

            it’s beginning to look like there is no helping you people though. it’s like you all just got here and you’re trying to convince the oldest grognard how bad things are. like, motherfucker, i’ve been here since 9/11.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          this is just keeping your head down and trying to survive the shit storm

          They aren’t a mom&pop small bussiness, they are a multi-national multi-billion dollar conglomerate that spans almost the entire world. They can afford to take the risk. They can “lobby” (aka: bribe) the government and get them to back off. Also, as far as I know, there were no legal requirement of mapmakers to change it. It’s always legal under the first amendment for mapmakers to make an “incorrect” map.

        • emmy67@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          In nazi Germany they had a name for those who kept their heads down and tried to survive the shitstorm. They were called Nazis.

          • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            ooo. somebody’s looking to score some upvotes for their virtue signaling.

            well, i’ll tell ya what boss… how about you get out there and start killing nazi’s then. otherwise you are one (by your own reasoning)

              • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                good.

                and if you’re implying that i’m the problem, then by all means, come and get me. i’d love to give you a lesson in getting shit done.

                • chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  We found an Internet tough guy, everyone back up! While we were busy virtue signaling this guy studied deez nuts.

          • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            To be fair, you shouldn’t call everyone a nazi.

            My grandparents ran away from the Japanese soldiers during the Japanese Invasion of China. Most of their village doesn’t consider them “collaborators” or “汉奸” (Han-Traitor). They did what they had to to survive. Fleeing from conflict is not the same as collaboration. Those who fled from the Taliban shouldn’t be labeled as “Islamic Extremists”. Ukranians who fled the draft shouldn’t be labeled as “Russian Sympathizers”.

            But that’s only for individuals, civillians, not corporations or politicians. Google definitely has no excuses. But the point I’m trying to make is: unless someone actually help the fascists, they shouldn’t be labeled as “nazis”. It’s not morally wrong to give in to human survival instincts and run away from conflict. If Anne Frank successfully fled nazi Germany, you wouldn’t call her a “nazi”, right?

          • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            not true. You should read what’s written back then

            not all Germans were considered NAZIs. Heck, not all Germans were even considered Germans.

            Why is everything black/white with lemmings?

        • Volkov@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          When they start rounding up trans people and deporting them to concentration camps, I’ll remember that the person shoving me into the train is just trying to keep his head down and weather the storm.

          • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            look, if you’re a soulless corporation just trying to deliver profits to shareholders, this is 100% the right move.

            the problem is not refusing to go along with some meaningless gesture based in ignorant nationalism. the problem is that we live in capitalism, where the right move is always the one that delivers profits. decisions lacking humanity are always going to get made. focusing on this nothingburger just distracts from the bigger picture.

            if you want results, destroy capitalism.

            • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              if you want results, destroy capitalism

              Says the person defending google…

              You don’t destroy capitalism by making concessions to mega-corp. If you truly want to destroy capitalism, you should be constantly taking every shot you can.

              • dustyb0tt0mz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                i’m not defending them. i’m just trying to temper your expectations. there’s a lot of uproar of pikachu shocked face stuff. it’s all symptoms of the illness. you will be slapping band aids on shit forever if you don’t attack the root cause of the illness.

                sometimes i think you all just want stuff to be outraged over. maybe you just like to post about it and get upvotes. maybe you just want to be part of an in-group.

                does that assumption bother you? because it bothers me that you think i’m pro-capitalism just because i won’t join in on your circle jerk.

                • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Reading through your post history I am inferring that you believe you’re smarter than everyone (due to pretty much a complete absence of any kind of snark for about a week. I didn’t go back further than that). I don’t believe you’re very smart. You’re the type of “leftist” that causes division amongst the left. That being said; yes, I believe you’re pro-capitalist. So with that, I block you.

      • Dingaling@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, right. Of course it is. Ever tell a dictator no? They’re very forgiving.

  • Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hahaha I thought Google was benevolently collecting my personal data for my own good. I consented right? /s

  • grandpaST@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I guess I can live with calling it “Gulf of America” if we also rename “Gulf of California” to “Gulf of Mexico”