you’re right, firstly, と can’t be used on its own like that to mean “and”, then 我の is not a thing, it’s 我が but really it should have been 僕の or something
and I think it should have been either 明かすな or 明かさないで, 明かさない is just plain negative
我のdefinitely is a thing (ware no), especially if you’re someone important like a daimyo. And と言いました is correct because you’re quoting (or reporting) something another has said.
Edit: oh I guess the speaker isn’t the daimyo. In any case, ware-no is grammatically correct.
you’re right, firstly, と can’t be used on its own like that to mean “and”, then 我の is not a thing, it’s 我が but really it should have been 僕の or something
and I think it should have been either 明かすな or 明かさないで, 明かさない is just plain negative
我のdefinitely is a thing (ware no), especially if you’re someone important like a daimyo. And と言いました is correct because you’re quoting (or reporting) something another has said.
Edit: oh I guess the speaker isn’t the daimyo. In any case, ware-no is grammatically correct.