• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is this why my wife is constantly complaining that her playlists constantly keep playing the same songs over and over?

    • America@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, that’s just random being random. In order for something truly random to feel less random to the average person, you have to reduce the repetition.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          <sigh>… And here I am, expecting “shuffle” to be a random ordering without repetition at all, like a silly person apparently.

          • Dave.@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            You mean “shuffle” like when you shuffle a deck of cards and have exactly the same cards still but in a different order with no single card repeating because you started out with a deck of cards and why would there suddenly be an extra card or 5 of the same face value in the deck because that’s just crazy talk? That kind of shuffle?

            Yeah sorry, Spotify doesn’t do that.

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              My problem with Spotify shuffle was that it always ended up throwing a similar order of songs. The same group of songs would end up in the same general position on the playlist every time. It’s not random, and it stands to reason that people doesn’t actually want real random order. But it was super obvious, noticeable and quite annoying to hit the same songs at the same time on your walk every single time. They even admitted publicly that their shuffle function sucks.

              • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                This is why I switched!!! I don’t use streaming services much, but I hated spotify’s shuffle and general music suggestions. So I tested qobuz and tidal, and can confirm that tidal’s suggestions are far superior to Spotify’s. I still prefer collecting albums and listening to them individually though

          • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            This, the Shuffle function should play every song exactly once, just in a random order. This is what cd players have been supporting since the late '80s.

            It is a very simple algorithm but Spotify turned it into something complex that barely works. By default, in large playlists, it will heavily prioritize some songs while others are almost never heard. People have complained about this for years and there is an option in the settings for it now, although I am not yet sure if that setting really disables all of the “smart” algorithms Spotify has associated with shuffle.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Idk why the donwvotes. This is how these players implement shuffle, because people don’t actually want a random shuffle most times.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      function GetRandomNumber(): return 42;

      It’s a random number, what more do you want 🤷‍♂️ /s

      • IratePirate@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        IllegalArgumentException: expected random number, got Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      My favourite example of Spotify being shit is:

      I want to play an album, so I go to it and press play. Then a bit later I want to queue a second album after the first one is done. How do I do that? As far as I can tell the answer is to go fuck myself. I have start a new queue or playlist with both albums in it.

      That’s apart from all the basic software quality stuff like randomly restarting the queue.

      Edit: so now I use finamp with jellyfin, which I can actually fix when it does something I hate.

      • LOLjoeWTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Have you fixed anything when it’s done something you’ve hated? I sometimes think, “I can fix this” and the I let my workarounds last for years. Like a leaky faucet where I fix it by rotating the handle not to 180° but to like 185.

        • Corngood@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, I try to make a point of using free software and contributing where I can. It does have to rise to a certain threshold of annoyance though.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The point of these apps is to leech as much money as possible.

        An opposing goal would be to make the app better for users.

      • unnamed1@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Spotifys UX has always been terrible. We all got used to having crappy software. It’s too convenient that’s AI also makes crappy vibecode without supervision. No one will notice anything.

        • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Podcast. Filter out episodes I’ve already listened to. Turn around. Filter out episodes I’ve already listened to. Put the app in the background. Filter out episodes that I’ve already listened to. Finish an episode. Filter out episodes I’ve already listened to. The year is 2026. Filter out episodes that I’ve already listened to.
          Tell me, why is that not persistent?

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          There was a time back in maybe… 2009(?) when the UI was great. It made sense, you could do everything you could possibly want very easily. Then they broke everything I think around 2012 and completely revamped the UI, and it’s never been good ever since.

          Glad I left it years ago.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    “As a concrete example, an engineer at Spotify on their morning commute from Slack on their cell phone can tell Claude to fix a bug or add a new feature to the iOS app,” Söderström said.

    Cool, so your goal is to replace your senior engineers with AI slop, but it’s still generating bugs? Doesn’t sound like much of an improvement.

    “And once Claude finishes that work, the engineer then gets a new version of the app, pushed to them on Slack on their phone, so that he can then merge it to production, all before they even arrive at the office.”

    Translation: Want to work as hard as a sole proprietor but not get paid like one? Great! You can work from your car while dealing with bullshit commuter traffic. Also, if you get into an accident, you can’t claim worker’s compensation or SDL, because you’re not technically on the job, yet! Thanks for being a team player!

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right? This article is so full of shit, there’s hardly room left for anything else. It’s like they only collected soundbites from the employees who are furthest from any actual development role…

    • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      i assumed the commuting to be done via public transport, but yes, you should not give one minute outside of working hours to the soulless company. I don’t know what these engineers are thinking, digging their way in the future when they’ll be made redundant.

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is the idea that they’re somehow reviewing the code on their phone during their commute? Or are they just pushing to prod without even glancing at it? Why bother with the middle man. Just have the AI push it. What a stupid admission.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s a “concrete example” that’s almost certainly fantasy. I bet everyone stood up and clapped when the engineer got to the office, too.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Truth no longer matters to these clowns. Who cares about it’s true? Who cares that Spotify is already good… And the one thing they can do to is make it worse?

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I wonder about this often: the product is finished; aside from curation, what else does it need?

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          An A-B repeat feature. Member when media players had that? I member. Back in my day you could listen to the ooga booga section of Freak on a Leash 162 times in a row with just two clicks.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not so sure. I could believe their entire productivity has been consumed by failing AI slop in code reviews.

    • UltraBlack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If I was working foe spotify I would honestly lie just to do something better than ask an AI to do bullshit for me

    • tleb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Probably just lying to their boss. I have an AI obsessed boss and regularly lie about how much I use it because productivity is actually measured entirely by their perception of you and not by any real metric.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I thought about lying on my last report but decided to not. At this point they’re going to have to fire me if they can’t accept the truth. I’m not lying to save my skin.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        And their bosses are just lying to their bosses, and it’s lying and yessing all up and down the line, and the rest of us out here just have to live with whatever The Machine pukes out for us.

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve tried explaining this to me peers that just quietly bust their asses while noisy jerks (including me, but to a lesser extent than most) get perceived as high performers because they engage with their bosses and work on things that have high visibility.

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s probably true.

      Think of it with this alternate headline:

      Spotify reclassifies what constitutes a good developer

      And no doubt, they’re capturing what these “good developers” do to better train the clanker to make the “bad developers” redundant.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m pretty sure the only way this is true, is if they qualify their best developers as the developers who use AI the most and by absolutely no metric which would indicate this is actually good code.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Please someone give me a decent non US alternative to this company.

    Make transfer easy for a family group.

  • Bookmeat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Vibe coding by experts can actually be effective. It’s the junior developers that really fuck it up.

    • EvenOdds@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Depends on what you call vibe coding. AI tools in the hands of experts can be effective, but definitely not fully hands off.

    • madjo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It can give me a starting point, but I’d never use it for anything production worthy.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If it’s only vibe coding, going by vibe, being an expert makes no difference.

      If you go for thorough reviews and corrections, supposed code generation efficiency gains are typically offset by review and correction effort.

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Glad i moved away from Spotify a year ago. Happy to ve using Qobuz and bandcamp