- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.ml
cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7760707
“Death to Germany because they say their reason for existing is to support ‘Israel’[1]? That’s genocidal against Germans.”
Sorry, but I don’t care about your colonizer fragility.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not a joke, they call this “Staatsräson”. ↩︎







Do you care about the rules here?
Top item in rule 7’s list.
I wonder if you even realise you’re doing it. The false equivalence, the collective blame by skin colour alone…
[Edit: not to mention the apparently absent consideration of the colonized white people with their land stolen, because that would defeat the racist narrative presented here in the OP image.]
This isn’t racism
You’re just in the post and you don’t like it
Fragile little colonizer
There is no such thing as anti-white racism.
You aint a real leftist unless you swallow every sabotage stance ever invented by COINTELPRO.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_Hoc_Committee_for_a_Marxist-Leninist_Party
- An Undercover CIA Agent
The fact that “white” once excluded “Irish” under certain conditions doesn’t make anti-white racism real.
Amazing. You a Mossad asset, or just helping them for the love of the game?
You got me, Mossad agents want you to understand whiteness.
Racsists love to “um akshually the Irish weren’t white, ergo anti-white rascism is real somehow”
Btw, one of these crackers copy pasted the I Have a Dream speech to prove that anti-white rascism is real. They aren’t sending their best
They view racism as an idea from which material forces arise, rather than the other way around.
lmao
That’s fun when uttered in intentional irony, satirically mocking the implausibility, ignorance, bigotry, denialism, etc. But I suspect you are saying that in all seriousness.
I’m genuinely baffled that you think I or other people who have said the same thing are being ironic. As others have pointed out, racism requires power structures. Anti-white “racism” isn’t real because it has no power structure to enforce it.
not enough people know racism != bigotry
I liked your explanation and thought it was good. I’m confused by multiple people in 2026 commenting and voting in a place called “leftymemes” not understanding such a basic concept as “racism requires privilege”.
You can tell it’s true even by thinking about it quickly without any deep analysis: a definition of racism based purely on bigotry would treat “cracker” and the n-slur at categorically equivalent, which is obviously ridiculous.
Of course they are serious. Because there is no such thing as anti-white racism
I long for the spirit of MLK’s sentiment, when he said:
Before the Orwellianisms.
someone can be prejudiced against white people but simple prejudice is not racism on its own. racism requires social structures
takes 2 seconds to pull up
academic language is more precise than vulgar usage of terms
White people can be racist against white skin people cause the concept of race is social construct designed by oppressors to colonize and oppress anyone.
Ireland was colonized by the British since the early 12th century. Irish people have faced inherent power systems that was only in favor of the British.
https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/unthinkable-are-irish-people-becoming-less-black-1.2453237
Or how Eastern Europeans faced violence during Brexit.
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/eastern-europe-brexit_uk_5accc2f5e4b0152082fdd6c8?ec_carp=7211846813776112354
Nigel Farage’s very racist Reform Party has a legitimate shot at forming the next UK government. Nigel Farage has gone on the record displaying their hatred for Eastern Europeans.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/nigel-farage-caught-saying-eastern-europeans-are-eating-our-swans-in-royal-parks-what-did-he-mean/ar-AA1NguYf
Which the hateful allegation of eating swans and carps is the same thing as JD Vance claiming that Haitians are eating cats and dogs.
Or how about Untermensch was a slur to mean to anyone of Eastern European descent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Untermensch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_policy_of_Nazi_Germany
Or Finnish people in immigrant to the US.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_whiteness_in_the_United_States#Finnish_Americans
Italians had no protection under the law in the US for a period of time. Italians were considered to be white and we’re not given any protection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_whiteness_in_the_United_States#Italian_Americans
This is why racism is a social construct created by the ruling class. The definition of whiteness can and will change at the behest of the ruling class to justify oppressing anyone who doesn’t fit the the parameters of being white. Even though historically Irish, Eastern Europeans, Finnish, and Italians have skin color that is white and are not considered white.
This is true, but the distinction between “white people” and “white skin people” makes it clear that the boundaries of “white people” are in effect defined by who is not a target of racism. It is, as you say, a social construct.
Frankly I usually just default to saying fuck the Anglo-Saxons.
A lot of “white” people aren’t Anglo-Saxons, though.
That’s my point.
This makes no sense. A lot of non Anglo-Saxons are as white as Anglo-Saxons. As I said:
If I understand your point correctly, it’s that some people who are sometimes in the category of “white” can be victims of racism in some situations because they are on the margins of whiteness. That’s true, but it doesn’t make racism against white people real.
Saying “racist” things about white people is not racist against those on the margins of whiteness who are sometimes conditionally white, such as Slavic people. You can be racist against Slavic people in certain contexts by saying racist things about Slavic people (and generally in those contexts Slavic people are not treated as “white” because that’s what “white” means), but not by saying “racist” things about white people (which isn’t possible).
You seem to be confusing who you are replying to here.
I have no idea what you are talking about here nor who you are quoting.