He said that the tariff is $1 per barrel of oil, adding that empty tankers can pass freely. “Once the email arrives and Iran completes its assessment, vessels are given a few seconds to pay in Bitcoin, ensuring they can’t be traced or confiscated due to sanctions,” Hosseini added.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d absolutely use crypto if it was more available in anything I’d want to pay for. So far it’s mostly just VPNs and donations

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      People tried that, it failed. It’s too volatile.

      It’s basically a way for people to think they are being sneaky and shit when it’s all trackable anyways.

        • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          To an extent it is but with enough resources and knowhow anything is traceable.

          It’s not always about direct traceability it’s the little bread crumbs that get left by everything. Nothing is absolute and everything we think is secure leaks like a mofo it’s just a matter of translating the data.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            True, a place like Iran could keep it untraceable, although they would have to take some extra care in order to do so. But for your average person that’s not being looked at by a nation state, it is much easier to remain untraceable.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Preferred crypto payment is USDT (Thether) stable coin. Which is the least US regulated, and most popular, US $ equivalent/backed stable coin. They are unlikely to refuse bitcoin, though.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m surprised Elon didn’t convince them to take the payments in Dogecoin…

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Purchasing drugs for yourself shouldn’t be a crime, so it’s awesome that cryptocurrencies exist for this purpose.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Technically it still is a crime since charging money for access to navigable waters is a violation of international law.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    “can’t be traced” - it’s a public blockchain, though. Everyone can see and trace transactions.

    When the money source is clear - it’s the shipping companies - you can trace their transactions.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Bitcoin is for dodging sanctions and the influence America has over the international banking and payment systems. It’s also may shield third parties from sanctions the US may impose on those who transact with Iran.

      • redsand@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Doesn’t need to be it’s just irreversible. That’s why north korean randsomeware has worked forever.

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It wouldn’t have anything to do with tracing transactions to North Korea being pointless and unactionable I’m sure.

  • Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    A million a ship on avg, high sea piracy is back.

    3 to 8 ships have paid in last 72hrs. Normally 320-600ships would have gone thru for free in that window.

    • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean… this happened after an illegal war, with probably hundreds of war crimes committed to Iran and hundreds of thousands from israel/US in totality across the region.

      This toll is nothing in comparison to that and I prefer this as Iran’s form of retaliation compared to more killing.

    • DirtSona@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The strait of hormus does not lie in international waters. What do you mean by “high sea piracy”?

          • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s considered international by international maritime law. Free passage, freedom of navigation is essential to trade and commerce.

            Iran‘s attack on international shipping is a breach of international law and an act of war.

            A blockade can be legal under international law, but it’s always an act of war. Demanding a toll to pass means it’s not a legal blockade.

            • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              There is no such thing as international law if countries don’t agree to it.

              For example the United States has laws and policies designed to prevent the arrest of U.S. personnel and its allies by the International Criminal Court (ICC). The 2002 American Service-Members’ Protection Act (ASPA) authorizes the US President to use “all means necessary and appropriate” to release U.S. or allied personnel detained by the ICC, often termed the “Hague Invasion Act”.