This effectively means no new fossil fuel equipment within a few years

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    From an energy point of view, generating hydrogen and burning it later is an absurdly inefficient cycle. It’s also a very small molecule that is extremely difficult to contain (understand: leak very easily).

    Electricity storage is an issue, but batteries are progressing at a much faster pace than electrolysis. As for transportation, it’s also difficult, but in most parts of the world, we either have the infrastructure already in place, or the place in question lack both electricity and gas. In addition to that, electricity can be generated close to the point of consumption with renewables and batteries.

    There are really no good reason to stand by hydrogen in a crushing majority of use cases.