verifiably
This article doesn’t even delve into that. The original Atlantic article does.
It works the same way all music copyright infringement cases go: meticulously prove that (parts of) lyrics, harmonies and melodies are too similar to some original to be coincidental.Not sure I like Big Music more for what is the next stage in a war that they’ve been waging for decades, but companies training AI in this way must be held accountable.
This is like Epic suing Google, I feel quite conflicted about rooting for companies I hate, but they’re going after an all consuming plague…
The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy, but there also my enemy’s enemy. Let them fight.
Didn’t the courts already decide that it’s fair game to train models on any data as long as the data wasn’t obtained illegally?
Was that an AI summary of an Atlantic article I just read?
Slopception
Sanitation posts absolutely whatever here and never takes it down regardless of pushback. Like a week ago or so, they posted a Times of India article (absolute shit outlet that takes bribes for positive coverage) published this month about a story that happened c. March 2024 as if it’d just happened. This was called out in the comments. Their response when I DM’d them pointing out irrefutable evidence in the comments and politely asking them to take it down (they replied to me just today) was basically “Do I have to? Just let them downvote it lol”.
Just knowingly flooding Lemmy with garbage. They shouldn’t be allowed to post in news comms with such shameless disregard for quality.
