Deleted by author
Rare Pelosi W, as the kids say.
Rare corporate democrat W
What’s that have to do with trans rights?
Sure. But for once, just this once, can we celebrate a win?
I agree with dunking on the deflection, but this is more a red herring logical fallacy, which is (as the image says) presenting an irrelevant (whether true or false) subject change to avoid rebutting the argument. It could also perhaps be framed as ad hominem or appeal to hypocrisy, though neither truly fit.
Not really a straw man fallacy, which involves presenting an intentionally weak version of a relevant core argument to easily rebut it.
Fixed
This is delightful. Thank you for sharing it.
Ooh. Logical fallacy referee meme. That’s cool, I’m stealing these. Thanks.
There are tons of them if you just do a Google image search.
I wish I could claim that I had made them, but I did not. I used these in Reddit arguments long past.
The Blade called Pelosi “one of the most influential champions of LGBTQ rights in American politics,” recognizing, among other things, her HIV/AIDS advocacy, as well as the roles she played in passing the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act and in repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
BoOoO dEmOcRaTs SuUuuuuCk!!11
She had to make sure she wasn’t running for reelection first.
