• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Something something and I’m tired of pretending it isn’t, etc. The only thing I feel bad about is if he has had young children who couldn’t understand he was a waste of skin, they have my sympathy.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.comdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        yeah alls his theoretical kids would have is millions of dollars, the best education, a lavish lifestyle, trust funds, but they would not have their asshole dad.

            • Zangoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              You can feel bad for his family while also not feeling bad about his death. Losing a loved one is hard regardless of how much money you have. That doesn’t mean it wasn’t ultimately a net positive (although I’m doubtful that UH will actually change any policies because of this)

              • moody@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                I feel bad for his kids. They didn’t choose their parents.

                His wife on the other hand did choose him, so fuck her too.

                • tabular@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  He and this wife didn’t choose their parents either (and any other contributing factors in their environment that made them who they are). Growing older doesn’t change the causes of the development of their brain, the cause of the choices you make, and if we could have saved them from becoming the person they did then we should.

                  With even the most evil people we can be sad they died but also happy they can’t do more evil. Uday Hussein, son of Saddam Hussein did some evil stuff and and if we could have prevented him from becoming the person he did when at age 8 or at age 18 then it’s the same.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Aren’t they already seperated?

                  So she is about to paid out big time with blood money he stole…

                  Yeah real peach

                • Zangoose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  What priorities are there? I’m talking about emotions, not actions.

                  You can feel bad for both the children of this guy that will now grow up without a father and the millions of people he harmed at the same time. I’m not even saying I feel equally as bad for his children as his victims’ children (because losing a parent to a preventable death due to insurance is objectively a worse situation). All I’m saying is it’s reasonable to feel sympathy for both. It’s not like the kids had a choice in what their dad did.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I would honestly go so far as to suggest that in the long term, not having this monster raise them (given they’ll still have plenty of money) probably leaves them better off.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          They’re already teenagers. The damage has been done, but hopefully this act will help them decide not to follow in their father’s footsteps.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          These execs are scared their own children will ask them to explain what they do for a living. Doubt they raise their kids as much as they pay someone else to do it. That being said, Elmo’s kids are stuck on a compound. That’s definitely going to mess them up.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          His kids are gonna be worse 20-40milliom per head.

          They will be fine. I doubt they will ever understand why entire society turned on their parasite shitstain father.

  • fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Who would’ve guessed reddit mods couldn’t grow a pair even if presented with a ball-growing pill

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      In fact, a moderator from a subreddit we hadn’t reached out to for comment reached out because they heard we were contacting moderators to speak about this. They said every instance they were aware of of the surveillance video of Thompson’s death being removed had not been moderators—who, as a reminder, are unpaid volunteers—but Reddit’s paid administrator team that enforces the sitewide terms of use.

      • fl42v@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sure, I’ve read both that and r/nursing parts; but I’m talking about those volunteers who do remove that stuff. I mean, yeah, promoting violence bad, and so on, but maybe the twatwaffles who refuse to build a proper universal healthcare system need to see that ppl support the shooter, and not the attempts of the community to censor itself?

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s one thing to mock it on pseudonymous platforms like Reddit and the fediverse.

    It’s another to do it somewhere linked to your real name and job like LinkedIn.

    People really hate insurance companies.

    • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      LinkedIn is one of the least sane social media sites I’ve ever had the displeasure of using. Under all the marketing BS and obviously fake feel good stories lie takes that would make your insane Facebook uncle blush.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t do it under your names folks, regime will be making lists based on this.

      They are scared and they will lash out.

      With that being said, fuck that parasite.

      FAFO

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        They already have lists. The only hope we have is to stand together in solidarity as the working class against the billionaire capitalists entering power.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        You think having a fake online name will stop them from finding out who you are? Did you even pay attention to the Snowden leaks?

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Make them spend more resources doing deanonymizations. First they have to get the IP from instance admins, then trace the tor routing, then the VPN that I use, then ask for my ISP. Make them do all that work.

          (Or maybe they already have access by simply activating their backdoors within Intel ME, AMD PSP, and whatever baseband backdoor on the phones they have, and have just gotten everyone’s real identities in an instant, we can’t know for sure.)

            • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I work in cryptography, and I guarantee if that’s true “some person you know who worked in government security” would not tell you if they did know, or they are pulling shit out of their ass. There have been so many people that have looked at or worked on SSL/TLS implementations (including some of my coworkers), any vulnerabilities would have to be pretty subtle or clever, and that would be kept highly classified. Quit making shit up or repeating bullshit you heard.

                • AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  That just would allow a malicious attacker to fake being the server, it doesn’t actually compromise the TLS session. So you are talking about a much more sophisticated multi stage attack that needs to be actively executed. This wouldn’t at all allow them to record traffic and decrypt later.

                  The certs authenticate that you are talking to the real server, the symmetric session keys that are usually derived from a diffie helman key exchange have nothing to do with certs. That’s two separate (but connected) parts of the transaction to build a TLS session.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              It wouldn’t be impossible. There are like so many different certificate issuers, any one of them collaborating with a government would allow them to create a certificate that would be accepted by your browser.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          i was talking about people commenting on linkedin actually…

          nor did I suggest reddit is anon, but aint you aint got provide your full name and address.

    • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      People are too hung up about anonimity on the internet. When one of my country’s worst journalistic shitrags mandated a real name policy due to the rampant racism and other -isms in the comment section of their articles… nothing changed. People are happily spewing the same vile rethoric as before and proud to, instead of being shamed into silence.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Don’t get scammed but if he ever needs a legal defense fund, I think the plebs can figure it out.

        He did job well, least we can do it pay respects

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Even if he did, any funds would be frozen. A Monero Address would be a better way of receiving money.

        Edit: Mind you, I expect him to very soon be arrested, so he wouldn’t really have any time to enjoy it.

        Edit 2: Look up Jim Bell. He wrote a very popular essay in the 90s.

        • daddy32@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Edit 2: Look up Jim Bell. He wrote a very popular essay in the 90s.

          This is one of the things that scares me about most about completely anonymous currencies and networks: untraceable kill orders and, to a lesser extent, unlimited bribery (that already exists in US). Because you know, it opens the most possibilities to people with money. Like billionaires.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            I suspect billionaires and other people of high authority, especially, would be the first ones on the list. But your average everyday person is very unlikely to be on the list because they don’t have enough people who hate them.

            • daddy32@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m not sure we would outweigh them - you know the statistics, almost half the wealth (potential kill orders) is held by top 1.1%.

    • boogiebored@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Can we crowdfund this, and provide a crypto bounty as reward for targets, including politicians, in the same way there was a reward for information on the shooter?

      This would be to let those who step out of line know how much disdain there is for any of them in particular at any given moment, and the rewards can be split as needed.

      The proletariat needs alternative systems of leverage.

      This is for my Purge sequel screenplay, of course. One can dream.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Bell

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        According to the media, he made a lot of very amateur mistakes if that’s the case. Like leaving a water bottle and granola bar wrappers and being filmed on camera at a Starbucks.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Has the Starbucks guy actually been confirmed as the same person? It looked like clearly a different jacket and backpack, I assumed that was either an accomplice or just an unfortunate lookalike, but I suppose he could have changed or it could just be odd lighting tricks.

        • Aztechnology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Leaving the DNA behind doesn’t really identify him if his DNA is not in the system.

          But nowadays the odds some relative of yours put theirs up on some family tree site is pretty high so they could narrow the suspect pool quite a bit going that route.

          • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            His DNA doesn’t need to be in any system. These days there are professionals that take DNA results and comb through the databases to find close relatives that are in the system. It’s how they caught the BTK Killer.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      When society gets to the point where you will die if you don’t do anything … or you will die if you do something …

      Eventually people realize that they will be punished, threatened or endangered no matter what they do or don’t do, some people will come to the conclusion that they would rather go down fighting.

      If you’re going to get screwed doing nothing, some would rather go out on a blaze of glory because they no longer have anything to lose.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I am assuming that when this guy is caught, what we will find out is that his wife had cancer and died from it and they refused to honor their claims or something like that.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Dealing with insurance with a nonfatal chronic illness can also be infuriating. You have to keep fighting the same battle over and over and over again.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Or perhaps himself dying of a treatable disease they refused to pay for. He’ll be a hero either way, the question is how much.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hopefully it doesn’t come to that, and he just never gets caught.

          If he does, it’s gonna be one hell of a gofundme campaign for his defense.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                If I was him id be in the Appalachians camping by now with no internet or cell connected devices. Id just wait a month or two and move all of my shit out of new york, mind you he may not even be a New Yorker he could be Californian for all we know.

              • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Oh, I’m almost certain that they would primarily because they would not want him having money to fight a legal battle.

                • Grimy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  He won’t be paying for it in either case, someone will pick this up pro-bono.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Falling Down was in my head this week. The number of people in the US that are close to it is so high, it’s barely fringe. Ironically Trump might just trigger a revolution when he tries to clamp down.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      ‘We have to wait for elections to attempt to fix anything’ is just something we’ve been brainwashed to believe.

      Enough people deciding they want change immediately makes it happen. Especially when those at the reigns fear immediate backlash.

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Elections were the deal. We’d vote for representatives and abide by their decisions rather than, y’know, killing people in the streets to change society.

        When elections can’t change society, though. When the deal is broken, it’s back to the old ways.

  • Guilherme@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Serious? People are reacting with laughing emojis? Really?

    😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
    😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆