• Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    People’s court should be prosecuting him not his island buddies that will turn a blind eye to everything he’s done and everything he’s doing.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The White House has described the allegations as “total baselessness,”

    Bullshit Barbie wording it up bigly, the greatest communicationalistic ever, believe me

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Typical demonrat hyping up of their baselessnessery, because they hate america. /s

      When I read the news now, I just skip any administration response to the article, the skimmiest skim, or any politician or business asshole’s response. I am sick of reading that bullshit.

      Bullshit Barbie there, I guess she has a super old husband. I wonder how he feels about his wife fucking other men? You know he’s a cuck, you know it. Someone should remind his old ass he’s not cool for having a young wife, because it’s a sham and she’s fucking her real lover not him. Divorce her.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t think this is Katie Johnson, since she came forward in 2016. This is the one they’re talking about:

    A redacted FBI report released as part of the botched release of the Epstein files revealed that the woman told interviewers Trump had forced her to perform a sexual act on him and punched her in the side of the head after she allegedly “bit the s–t out of” his penis.

    Trump is then alleged to have yelled, “Get this little b—h the hell out of here,” according to an FBI memo detailing one of Jane Doe 4’s interviews.

    • Thorry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Perfect how they are talking about child rape and the victim defending their selves by biting the penis. But let’s sensor the word bitch, the readers would be shocked and outraged if they read such a foul word. Wtf is wrong with people these days…

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not people. If I recall correctly it has to do with ads. Like if your website has ads on it for the XYZ company, and their automatic content reading bot sees too many “bad words”, then they won’t advertise on your site anymore and the site owner loses the ad revenue. It’s stupid, but it explains why the word itself is more important than the content of the article. Because the bots look for words and have a threshold or something.

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Junk science.

        Those shows are propaganda. Propublica has done some good reporting on this, I can link it if you care to read any of it.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It doesn’t require much science. Victim testifies she bit the attacker and it drew blood. Attacker has scar of approximately the same age. That’s not going to secure a conviction on its own, but it adds to the prosecution’s evidence.

          If it didn’t draw blood, it’d be harder to find a lasting mark.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not saying it’s good science. It’s just a good point. If you have a bite scar on your dick, it’s most likely because you tried putting it somewhere that it should not be.

          In the context where a lady comes out of the shadows and says she put a scar on Trumps mushroom, where nobody had ever mentioned a scar on Trumps mushroom before, and it is later revealed that Trump does indeed have a scar on his mushroom…

          If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck… what is it?

          • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Preaching to the choir, I was speaking technically.

            The odds that the president would be convicted with such junk sciencer were zero when he was just a rich asshole. There is no chance this holds as of now. Someone of character needs to take the lead, if you get my drift.

            Old man time is on the case though, and it changes little, without a popular alternative we are fucked.

        • workerONE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          The existence of a scar would be telling and they already know who did the biting so it’s not a matter of bite matching.