Which is your preferred messaging app? I just want some insights about these two.

You may share other messaging apps too.

  • Mensh123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Matrix is only really enjoyable with unencrypted chats.

    I have fairly recently switched phones. Now, a good number of older messenges fail to decrypt. Even when I don’t switch devices, a group chat for a three day long event with a very small group already gave us lots of fun decryption errors. Oh, and I have this other fun group chat where Fluffy Chat constantly reminds me that people whose devices I haven’t verified will be able to read my messenges every time I send something. Also, Matrix has coutless clients with different feature sets and I heard calls are a pain to ßet up.

    Signal, on the other hand, just works. Federation and decentralization is obviously nice but a functional product is more importmant. I haven’t had a chance to try XMPP unfortunately.

    • Transparent_knoll@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You should be able to decrypt the messages if you still have the old device to verify the new connection, or if you saved the encryption key that’s setup when you first login to the account.

      Appreciate it’s not as simple as logging in, because that’s the point of separating the encryption key from login creds in the first place. Even if your accounts credentials are compromised, previous messages aren’t, and any future messages from the unverified device are flagged as suspicious.

      XMPP has some good options. I tried utilising mov.im servers, which claims to have E2EE.(using conversations app to connect) Its very user friendly and just works. Though, I’m not sure how the encryption works on there as I’d already got my users used to element, and saw no reason to move (IMO its still a better option than signal due to the self hosting capabilities, but depends on what level of solution you’re after)

  • undrwater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Only because nobody answered with this one:

    IRC

    Decentralized and an open protocol. Client setup to connect is not so straightforward, but it’s a one and done. Very robust.

    I’m allergic to centralized communication schemes, though I do use signal to communicate with one person.

    I want to research some of the other suggestions that have been brought up, so thank you for the post!

  • sifar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago
    • If you have a targeted group/peer need then whatever they are using or whatever you all decide right in the beginning - I’d suggest Matrix or some other decentralised alternative, definitely not Signal.
      • Matrix had the huge opportunity to be “the messaging app” but they neither became good at corporate usage and definitely ended up sucking at personal usage. They started doing too many things, at once, and while completely ignoring the individual user.
    • If you want a wider general acceptance then sadly Matrix is DoA. WhatsApp becomes a huge choice outside USA and China but it has started becoming shittier by the day and looking at who has become WhatsApp’s global head now, I don’t think it’s gonna get any better (check his last “app” or company’s screenshots and come here if you don’t end up vomiting). So Signal or maybe some other similar app. You are limited by societal trends and acceptance here, not the tech or finesse or privacy of an app.
    • If you just want privacy and a simpler app, proven (at least so far), then well Signal it is, as much as I hate it for reasons they decided to make it a centralised messaging app and then stuffed crypto in it etc.
  • Lionel C-R@lemmy.coupou.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I prefer matrix for two main reasons:

    • I can host my own server (and I do)
    • It’s not centralized

    As a bonus it has briddes for almost anything you can think of, so I use the signal bridge.

  • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I use both. No, really.

    If one’s intent is to connect with as many people as possible, having as many messaging/real chat apps as possible is a good idea (imo).

    That’s why I have WA, DC, Stoat, Signal, Matrix and IRC.

  • theannoyingfruit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I use matrix with a bunch of my friends to replace discord and and it is quite good. The main draw for me was the awesome client options like fluffy chat, commet, and sable.

  • ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I actually prefer XMPP. It’s also less of a hassle to set up than Matrix and the protocol is much more mature. There are still issues, but it’s rather functional for audio and video calls (if you’re using a supported client).

    Edit: For clients, I use Cheogram on Android and Profanity (which is a TUI) or DinoX (for calls) on Linux.

  • BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Signal is more stable & simple to set up. So for its intended use, getting people to actually talk to me on it, it’s better.

    Matrix is obviously better as a Discord replacement. It doesn’t require a phone number which is also good. Not centrally managed so easier to decouple from big tech corruption. So it is better in those ways.

    • jksalcedo@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I agree. Signal is easier to use and to get people switch to it since the UI/UX are vey similar to other big platforms.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Signal. Matrix was made by Israeli spyware company Amdocs and when an employee was asked about it after the split to a UK company they pretended like Amdocs wasn’t caught in multiple global spyware scandals already.

    • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Matrix is literally an open standard, use a server and client written by people you trust, or write your own.

      Signal is made by a private company and is completely closed source.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Signal is open source but it’s hosted centrally. So you’re trusting their server.

        Matrix is a protocol it’s not hosted anywhere. But the primary developer and host instance now called Element.

        But it being created and initially bankrolled by an Israeli spyware company known for creating backdoors, and the lead devs still refusing to acknowledge that doesn’t inspire me much more confidence.

        If you want privacy SimpleX seems like better option than Matrix.

        • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          You can host a server which uses software not written by Element. Same for the client.

          I don’t trust the Signal devs because I have no reason to. I don’t want to use anyone else’s servers unless I’m paying them or they’re paying me 😅

          And I love swapping/trying new clients.

          • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You glossed over the fact that it came from Israel’s intelligence-community. Its design is woeful–that’s the protocol, regardless of client or server implementation. The project reeks of a state-backed program to get ahead of the increasing desire for encryption in everyday communications. Yet encryption has always been an after thought within that program. All those bridges to funnel different protocols into the program.

  • BaraCoded@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I feel uneasy about Signal being an app centralized in the USA, but it is the only one streamlined enough to be usable by non tech-savvy friends and family. I wonder if it will fall prey to Chat Control in Europe, so the time to explore alternatives will soon be upon us.

    So far, I have heard of XMPP, Matrix, Delta chat and SimpleX. Never got friends to switch to XMPP or Matrix for more than one conversation, so I guess we’re just f*cked.

    • jksalcedo@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Me neither. In fact, all my friends and almost all people here are only using Messenger and Telegram.

  • roundabout@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    From purely a user perspective, because I haven’t dug into the tech behind either, I’d probably vote Matrix. Signal is nice but personally I find matrix easier to use for group chats and bigger rooms. I only have 4-5 people on signal and it’s useful for those moments but on Matrix I can find bigger chats to join and jump in and just talk with a handful of people.