• braxy29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          so calling him any slur is okay, or just this one?

          i mean, fuck that guy, but that word has a heavy and hateful impact on some people. i just think it’s easier for people to ignore that one than to ignore several others, unfortunately.

          • TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I can get over minor things and words that don’t matter just fine. Can you? Thick skin and resilience matters a whole of a lot more than nagging other people about certain words.

            • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              If you can really get over minor things then why did you post this? Seems like you’re still nagging people over word choice. Some thicker skin would avoid this problem.

            • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Thick skin and resilience matters a whole of a lot more than nagging other people about certain words.

              [citation needed]

                • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I don’t know what c through w is referring to though

                  Cunt, bitch, slut, Wagnerian. I hate those bastards blasting me with the Nibelungen overture.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        The reason good people don’t need rules is because they wouldn’t violate them even if they did. Using that to rationalize being a jerk is misapplying it.

        If you’re a “good man,” you wouldn’t be using the r-slur in the first place. The exact cognitive dissonance which allows fascists to be fascists is that they believe themselves to be good people and therefore don’t need rules. But instead of actually being good people, they use this as an excuse to be terrible to others.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Long ago, my father would inspect hospitals and would have to call in his reports and I’d frequently hear the r-word - in its original form - in those instances, at least originally. And like you say, that word was originally meant as a euphemism since it just means “slowed”.

        A term that was more frequently slung around on our playground, probably more than the r-word was “sped”, which took me a long time to connect with the shorthand for saying SPecial EDucation.

      • Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yeah, I’ve never liked the outrage surrounding this because people are such hypocrites. People will censor you for using r*****, but then turn right around and call you an idiot or a moron, as if they aren’t the same thing with the same shitty sentiment behind it.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Because they were using the r-slur? That only makes sense. It’s against the community rules, is it not? The mods here never claimed to be free speech absolutists.

        If you think the problem here is that people aren’t allowed to use the r-slur, you completely missed the point of the article.

        The hypocrisy is the main issue. This admin cries about how people can’t say the r-slur anymore, and then they get butthurt and threaten abuses of power when it’s used against them.

        Weaponizing the FBI against some jerks on the internet is a huge part of the problem too. Enforcing conduct and language standards falls on content moderation teams, not federal law enforcement. That doesn’t mean the whole internet should be the wild west. Unless you’re okay with nazis spouting hate? Because that’s what you’ll get with free speech absolutism.

        So honestly I really don’t get you’re point. Should the mods not remove comments that use slurs, and ban repeat offenders?

          • Isaac (ieh)@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I suggest using the power of your free speech to walk up in person too anyone of color and using any of those words to their face and see how your “free speech” goes.

            Furthermore, a little reasearch on what “free speech” means and doesn’t mean might be in order.

            What I find interesting is that so many people seem to want to stand up on the side of bigotry and demand their “right” to be a bigot and use bigoted language. I’m not sure that’s really a great look.

            • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              and see how your “free speech” goes

              So you are saying that black and brown people are more prone to violence? Sounds racist.

  • s@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    My first read of this headline was that Patel’s orders were for the agents to call him that

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Revelations in November 2025 that Mr Patel, 46, was using taxpayer-funded jets to watch performances by his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, a 27-year-old country music singer, also prompted widespread criticism.

    Fails the half-his-age-plus-seven rule.

    • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Until school-aged children begin calling their friends reject, then we will have to shift to more positive language like not unrejected. The object being of course to make it as obnoxious as possible for kids to use therapy language to make fun of each other.

  • Discountsoup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    One of my daughters has CP and we use the term ironically often… is retard really becoming a slur? We think it’s fine if you’re not special needs around these parts. However if you called a special needs person retarded then its basically fighting words.

    • dbtng@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Man, I agree with you, but these are the rules:

      “All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed.”

      How you execute a consistent set of policies when the rules say you don’t have to be consistent is beyond me.

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        LOL! I think it’s one of those “read the room first” situations.

        I’ve always said Kash Patel deserves 100% of the shit the GOP spews thrown right back in his “special needs” face… but that IS a slur against the actual people that are disabled, since Patel isn’t really needing of any special treatment or help… beyond the karmic swift one in the pants he so deserves.

        Which should be given with extreme wit, vigor and prejudice.

        • DillDough@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Consider the actual definition of the word not just how it makes you feel…it applies to both Patel personally and his role in the current administration, he is actively retarding our entire law enforcement system as well as the investigation against the single largest, most vile, and most influential criminal organization to ever exist. It can be a slur but it’s not inherently a slur.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    You can tell it’s a slur because of how haughty people get when you tell them they can’t say it. Lol they really want to be able to say it.