https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources
You can notice a bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes from the above.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources
You can notice a bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes from the above.
Yes, because the “easily-notable bias” is just a result of discussions done at different times to different evidence, and claiming bias is an overgeneralization.
I genuinely don’t know what you people even think bias is at this point
Bias just means that you have a worldview, which everyone has whether they acknowledge it or not simply by living and existing in the real world.
Ok, but I wasn’t the one implying Wikipedia editors as a group are biased.
They are. Everyone has a bias.
Me:
You:
Groups usually cancel bias. And the leftover bias is not “easily notable”
Groups do not cancel bias. Wikipedia is overwhelmingly western, which becomes a western bias. Groups reinforce bias.
Lmao, so we’re just saying shit now, alright. Famously unbiased:
I think you struggle to understand what the word “bias” means. It seems like it just short-circuits in your brain to “bad”.
I trust Wikipedia because I edit on it, and I have no will to continue this conversation.