LineageOS, mostly due to the fact that it’s pretty close to the original vision of AOSP; and my devices do not support Graphene or PostmarketOS, so there are almost no viable alternatives.
LineageOS for me
I use GrapheneOS on my main phone, but I use Evolution X for my second phone, and crDroid for my tablet
Note that only GrapheneOS supports bootloader re-locking tho
Right now? GrapheneOS and I don’t think I’ll switch to anything else until a phone option outside of big tech emerges.
Favorite of all time was probably Cyanogenmod up to Gingerbread and AOKP for that holo era (ICS, Jellybean, KitKat.)
I think around the Nexus 5, I stopped using custom roms until GrapheneOS.
Using Graphene, tempted by Lineage.
never seen nor expected to see this trajectory – what’s making lineage tempting?
Lineage OS is the ultimate deGoogle; I’m not comfortable with android at all given the influence Google has over its development.
LineageOS also can run on more phones; current Graphene ONLY runs on Pixels, soon to run on Motorola, but the Graphene hw requirements are HEAVY–only flagship phones have what Graphene requires, and I’m poor.
LineageOS is less secure, though, so I’d be sacrificing that.
my antipathy towards google greatly outweights my thread model so i prioritize degoogling over security and it also made me wait for motorola’s phone instead of buying any pixel today.
Lineage OS is the ultimate deGoogle
now knowing that motorola has graphene slated for its ultra high end folding phones next makes me question my decisions, so this is intriguing AF and i’ve never heard anyone say it before – what does it mean to you?
Oh, looks like I was confused. I thought LineageOS was a Linux based system, but it’s still Android so what I said doesn’t make a ton of sense… but my next attempt at my next phone will be some Linux OS so I can completely get off android. But if I have to stay within the Android ecosystem for whatever reason and don’t have the money for a Pixel (or fucking definitely not a fold), I’ll probably try Lineage.
GrapheneOS undisputed #1 for me, but also RestlessOS or LeOS for devices that are only compatible with GSI since those also strip out pings to Google.
I like e/os with micro-G
At the moment I’m using iodeOS
I’ve been thoroughly enjoying e/os in s Fairphone 6.
LineageOS, good enough to degoogle and if it’s possible for you to use F-Droid-only apps you are out of the surveillance machinery (with the exception of the TSP if you use a SIM card) and it’s a huge step from stock Android in terms of privacy.
A better question is how many are really out there at the moment.
Early 2000s there was so many for any model phone. Now it feels like those are mostly gone and there’s only 5-6 left.
You had a phone with a custom rom in the early 2000s???
Respect!
You haven’t been working for Nokia’s dev team back then by any chance, have you? ;-)
GrapheneOS has best privacy and security, but also has the biggest disadvantage: available only on Google phones. But in 2027 it will be released on Motorola, too.
GrapheneOS - maximum security and privacy for phones and tablets
- More Android apps than on other deGoogled OSs
- Very secure (hack-resistant) if correctly set up and used
- Easy to install to the few phones it accepts (some Google, some Motorola 2027)
- Beginner-hostile, complicated manual setup
- Good website and active forum
Notable mention for the beginner-friendly /e/OS (technically inferior compared to GrapheneOS, installable to more devices).
I haven’t tried CalyxOS yet. I had CyanogenMod for a few years before it was LineageOS.
I have always been happy with the main player.
Have been running Lineage OS since the days it still was CyanogenMod.GrapheneOS and LineageOS are personally my favourite Android distributions.
“Custom ROM” is technically a false term for them, and LineageOS, PrivacyGuides and other institutions use the term “Android distributions” instead.
“Custom ROM” is technically a false term for them, and LineageOS, PrivacyGuides and other institutions use the term “Android distributions” instead.
Why?
Read-only memory (ROM) is hardware, a chip, or an area on a chip. Flash storage used to store a system image is not read-only, but the term “ROM” has somehow creeped onto it. The definition of read-only in my opinion is that you have to use a separate device to write it, it can’t be writable by the device that uses it, it has to be write-protected in use.
The operating system image colloquially called “custom ROM” is software (firmware) written to flash storage. It’s not read-only and it’s data, not memory hardware. If it were read-only, we wouldn’t need verified boot (bootloader locking) to detect malware edits in it.
